Cited by 196Protein Structure and DynamicsEnzyme Structure and FunctionMachine Learning in Bioinformatics

Impact of protein conformational diversity on AlphaFold predictions

Open access
Saldaño, Tadeo, Escobedo, Nahuel, Marchetti, Julia, Zea, Diego Javier, Mac Donagh, Juan, Velez Rueda, Ana Julia, Gonik, Eduardo, García Melani, Agustina +8 more·2022·Bioinformatics

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

MOTIVATION: After the outstanding breakthrough of AlphaFold in predicting protein 3D models, new questions appeared and remain unanswered. The ensemble nature of proteins, for example, challenges the structural prediction methods because the models should represent a set of conformers instead of single structures. The evolutionary and structural features captured by effective deep learning techniques may unveil the information to generate several diverse conformations from a single sequence. Here, we address the performance of AlphaFold2 predictions obtained through ColabFold under this ensemble paradigm. RESULTS: Using a curated collection of apo-holo pairs of conformers, we found that AlphaFold2 predicts the holo form of a protein in ∼70% of the cases, being unable to reproduce the observed conformational diversity with the same error for both conformers. More importantly, we found that AlphaFold2's performance worsens with the increasing conformational diversity of the studied protein. This impairment is related to the heterogeneity in the degree of conformational diversity found between different members of the homologous family of the protein under study. Finally, we found that main-chain flexibility associated with apo-holo pairs of conformers negatively correlates with the predicted local model quality score plDDT, indicating that plDDT values in a single 3D model could be used to infer local conformational changes linked to ligand binding transitions. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Data and code used in this manuscript are publicly available at https://gitlab.com/sbgunq/publications/af2confdiv-oct2021. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/bioinformatics/btac202

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • It is not immediately clear from pLDDT or PAE whether an AF2 model resembles the apo or holo form.

    “whether the modeled structure resembles the apo or holo form of the protein is not immediately clear from analysis of pLDDT scores or PAE graphs32”
  • The standard AlphaFold implementation detects only a single structural snapshot, the ground state, likely because its training set lacks a large set of redundant protein conformers.

    “The standard implementation of AlphaFold performs well only in detecting a single structural snapshot (the “ground state” structure), likely due to the lack of a large set of redundant protein conformers in the training set16,32.”
  • AF2 has been demonstrated to fail in predicting multiple structures of metamorphic proteins, proteins with apo/holo conformational changes and other multi-state proteins using its default settings.

    “yet AF2 has been demonstrated to fail in predicting multiple structures of metamorphic proteins11, proteins with apo/holo conformational changes12 and other multi-state proteins13 using its default settings.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Saldaño, T., Escobedo, N., Marchetti, J., Zea, D. J., Mac Donagh, J., Velez Rueda, A. J., Gonik, E., García Melani, A., Novomisky Nechcoff, J., Salas, M. N., Peters, T., Demitroff, N., Fernandez Alberti, S., Palopoli, N., Fornasari, M. S., & Parisi, G.
Affiliations
  • National University of Quilmes (AR)
  • Independent Researcher , 31400 Toulouse, France
  • Departamento de Ciencia y Tecnología, Universidad Nacional de Quilmes , Bernal, Argentina
  • Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (AR)
  • IMBICE (CONICET – UNLP), Laboratorio de Electrofisiología , La Plata, Argentina
  • Fundación Instituto Leloir (AR)
Corresponding author
Parisi, Gustavo
Venue
Bioinformatics
Published
2022-04-05
Volume
38
Issue
10
Pages
2742-2748
ISSN
  • 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
  • 1367-4811
OpenAlex
W4225552973
Cited by
196
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 45 · 2025: 54 · 2024: 52 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 16
FWCI
12.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Bioinformatics (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Greater South Information System
Funders
  • Universidad Nacional de Quilmes (PUNQ 1309/19)
  • Agencia Nacional de Promoción de la Investigación, el Desarrollo Tecnológico y la Innovación (PICT-2018 3457)
  • Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (PIP-2015-2017 11220150100853CO)
  • European Union's Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Staff Exchange Program (778247, 823886)
  • CONICET
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Enzyme Structure and Function
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
Keywords
protein conformational diversity, AlphaFold2, ColabFold, protein ensembles, ligand binding, pLDDT, model quality assessment, homologous protein families, protein structure prediction
MeSH terms
Protein Binding, Protein Conformation, Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review