PreprintCited by 1Protein Structure and DynamicsMachine Learning in BioinformaticsComputational Drug Discovery Methods

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Multi-objective optimization for designing structurally similar proteins with diverse sequences

Open access
Akiba, Ryo, Moriwaki, Yoshitaka, Ishitani, Ryuichiro, Yoshikawa, Naruki·2025·Science and Technology of Advanced Materials Methods

Preprint — published as 10.1080/27660400.2025.2611575 · Paper page

Abstract

Recent advances in artificial intelligence technologies have accelerated the development of computational protein design techniques. Although the structure of the designed proteins has been the primary focus, diversity of designed amino acid sequences is another important aspect of protein design. To address the trade-off between reducing sequence similarity and improving structural similarity, simultaneous optimization of these two objectives can be effective. We present a method that integrates ProteinMPNN with the multi-objective optimization algorithm NSGA-II to design proteins that retain high structural similarity to a target while exhibiting low sequence similarity. Using Top7 as a reference protein, we demonstrate that our approach improves sequence diversity compared to the original ProteinMPNN while maintaining comparable structural similarity.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2025.09.13.676063

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. 10.1016/j.cell.2023.12.028 · DOI
  2. 2024, Diffusion models in protein structure and docking, Wiley Interdiscip Rev Comput Mol Sci, 14, e1711, 10.1002/wcms.1711 · DOI
  3. 10.1038/s41586-023-06415-8 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1038/s41586-023-06728-8 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1038/s41586-021-04184-w · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1126/science.add1964 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1126/science.add2187 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1038/s41587-020-00793-4 · DOI
  9. Sturmfels P , Rao R , Verkuil R , et al. Seq2MSA: a language model for protein sequence diversification. In: Machine Learning in Structural Biology Workshop, NeurIPS 2022; 2022.
  10. Silva LA , Meynard-Piganeau B , Lucibello C , et al. Fast uncovering of protein sequence diversity from structure. In: The Thirteenth International Conference on Learning Representations; 2025. Available from: https://openreview.net/forum?id=1iuaxjssVp. · DOI
  11. Coello CAC , Lamont GB , Veldhuizen DAV . Evolutionary algorithms for solving multiobjective problems. Springer, New York (NY); 2007.
  12. Luo J , Ding K , Luo Y. Pareto-optimal sampling for multi-objective protein sequence design. iScience. 2025;28(3). · DOI
  13. 2024, An integrative approach to protein sequence design through multiobjective optimization, PLoS Comput Biol, 20, e1011953, 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011953 · DOI
  14. 10.1109/4235.996017 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1038/S41592-022-01488-1 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1002/prot.20264 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1038/s41592-022-01585-1 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1126/science.1089427 · DOI
  19. 10.1038/S41586-024-07487-W · DOI · Paper page

Metadata

Authors
Akiba, R., Moriwaki, Y., Ishitani, R., & Yoshikawa, N.
Affiliations
Institute of Science Tokyo (JP)
Corresponding author
  • Ishitani, Ryuichiro
  • Yoshikawa, Naruki
Venue
Science and Technology of Advanced Materials Methods
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2025-09-17
Volume
6
Issue
1
ISSN
2766-0400 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W7119542277
Cited by
1
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1
FWCI
2.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Science and Technology of Advanced Materials Methods (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Materials Data Repository (cc-by)
Funders
  • Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development
  • Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (25K21333)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Drug Discovery › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
Keywords
protein design, multi-objective optimization, structural similarity, sequence similarity, ProteinMPNN, NSGA-II, sequence diversity, protein structure prediction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review