The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The UCSC Xena platform for public and private cancer genomics data visualization and interpretation
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1038/s41587-020-0546-8 · Paper page
Abstract
UCSC Xena is a visual exploration resource for both public and private omics data, supported through the web-based Xena Browser and multiple turn-key Xena Hubs. This unique archecture allows researchers to view their own data securely, using private Xena Hubs, simultaneously visualizing large public cancer genomics datasets, including TCGA and the GDC. Data integration occurs only within the Xena Browser, keeping private data private. Xena supports virtually any functional genomics data, including SNVs, INDELs, large structural variants, CNV, expression, DNA methylation, ATAC-seq signals, and phenotypic annotations. Browser features include the Visual Spreadsheet, survival analyses, powerful filtering and subgrouping, statistical analyses, genomic signatures, and bookmarks. Xena differentiates itself from other genomics tools, including its predecessor, the UCSC Cancer Genomics Browser, by its ability to easily and securely view public and private data, its high performance, its broad data type support, and many unique features.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cerami, E., Gao, J., Dogrusoz, U., Gross, B. E., Sumer, S. O., Aksoy, B. A., Jacobsen, A., Byrne, C. J., Heuer, M. L., Larsson, E., et al. (2012) · Cancer Discovery · doi:10.1158/2159-8290.cd-12-0095 · Cited by 17,455
Integrative Genomics Viewer (IGV): high-performance genomics data visualization and exploration
Thorvaldsdottir, H., Robinson, J. T., & Mesirov, J. P. (2013) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbs017 · Cited by 9,049
The Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia enables predictive modelling of anticancer drug sensitivity
Barretina, J., Caponigro, G., Stransky, N., Venkatesan, K., Margolin, A. A., Kim, S., Wilson, C. J., Lehár, J., Kryukov, G. V., Sonkin, D., et al. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11003 · Cited by 7,950
Comprehensive molecular profiling of lung adenocarcinoma
The Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature13385 · Cited by 5,732
Genetic effects on gene expression across human tissues
GTEx Consortium (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature24277 · Cited by 4,036
Oncogenic Signaling Pathways in The Cancer Genome Atlas
Sanchez-Vega, F., Mina, M., Armenia, J., Chatila, W. K., Luna, A., La, K. C., Dimitriadoy, S., Liu, D. L., Kantheti, H. S., Saghafinia, S., et al. (2018) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2018.03.035 · Cited by 3,201
Hoadley, K. A., Yau, C., Hinoue, T., Wolf, D. M., Lazar, A. J., Drill, E., Shen, R., Taylor, A. M., Cherniack, A. D., Thorsson, V., et al. (2018) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2018.03.022 · Cited by 2,546
International network of cancer genome projects
The International Cancer Genome Consortium (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08987 · Cited by 2,299
Machine Learning Identifies Stemness Features Associated with Oncogenic Dedifferentiation
Malta, T. M., Sokolov, A., Gentles, A. J., Burzykowski, T., Poisson, L., Weinstein, J. N., Kamińska, B., Huelsken, J., Omberg, L., Gevaert, O., et al. (2018) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2018.03.034 · Cited by 2,180
The impact of next-generation sequencing technology on genetics
Mardis, E. R. (2008) · Trends in Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.tig.2007.12.007 · Cited by 2,053
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- 2017, Comparative genomic analysis for pediatric cancer patients evaluated in a California Initiative to Advance Precision Medicine Demonstration Project, Journal of Clinical Oncology, 35, TPS10578, 10.1200/JCO.2017.35.15_suppl.TPS10578 · doi:10.1200/jco.2017.35.15_suppl.tps10578
Cited by
Pan-cancer analysis of whole genomes
The ICGC/TCGA Pan-Cancer Analysis of Whole Genomes Consortium, Aaltonen, L. A., Abascal, F., Abeshouse, A., Aburatani, H., Adams, D. J., Agrawal, N., Ahn, K. S., Ahn, S.-M., Aikata, H., et al. (2020) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-020-1969-6 · Cited by 3,064
Self-citationState of the field in multi-omics research: from computational needs to data mining and sharing
Krassowski, M., Das, V., Sahu, S. K., & Misra, B. B. (2020) · Frontiers in Genetics · doi:10.3389/fgene.2020.610798 · Cited by 351
Martin, C. J., Datta, A., Littlefield, C., Kalra, A., Chapron, C., Wawersik, S., Dagbay, K. B., Brueckner, C. T., Nikiforov, A., Danehy, F. T., et al. (2020) · Science Translational Medicine · doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.aay8456 · Cited by 224
CAMOIP: a web server for comprehensive analysis on multi-omics of immunotherapy in pan-cancer
Lin, A., Qi, C., Wei, T., Li, M., Cheng, Q., Liu, Z., Luo, P., & Zhang, J. (2022) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbac129 · Cited by 152
A radiogenomics signature for predicting the clinical outcome of bladder urothelial carcinoma
Lin, P., Wen, D.-Y., Chen, L., Li, X., Li, S.-H., Yan, H.-B., He, R.-Q., Chen, G., He, Y., & Yang, H. (2020) · European Radiology · doi:10.1007/s00330-019-06371-w · Cited by 63
Metadata
- Authors
- Goldman, M., Craft, B., Hastie, M., Repečka, K., Kamath, A., McDade, F., Rogers, D., Brooks, A. N., Zhu, J., & Haussler, D.
- Venue
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2018-05-18
- OpenAlex
- W2804291108
- Cited by
- 448
- References
- 34
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The UCSC Xena platform for public and private cancer genomics data visualization and interpretation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1101/326470
- The paper
- Goldman, M., Craft, B., Hastie, M., Repečka, K., Kamath, A., McDade, F., Rogers, D., Brooks, A. N., Zhu, J., & Haussler, D. (2018). The UCSC Xena platform for public and private cancer genomics data visualization and interpretation. bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory). https://doi.org/10.1101/326470
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
