Archaeology of Eukaryotic DNA Replication
Open accessAbstract
Recent advances in the characterization of the archaeal DNA replication system together with comparative genomic analysis have led to the identification of several previously uncharacterized archaeal proteins involved in replication and currently reveal a nearly complete correspondence between the components of the archaeal and eukaryotic replication machineries. It can be inferred that the archaeal ancestor of eukaryotes and even the last common ancestor of all extant archaea possessed replication machineries that were comparable in complexity to the eukaryotic replication system. The eukaryotic replication system encompasses multiple paralogs of ancestral components such that heteromeric complexes in eukaryotes replace archaeal homomeric complexes, apparently along with subfunctionalization of the eukaryotic complex subunits. In the archaea, parallel, lineage-specific duplications of many genes encoding replication machinery components are detectable as well; most of these archaeal paralogs remain to be functionally characterized. The archaeal replication system shows remarkable plasticity whereby even some essential components such as DNA polymerase and single-stranded DNA-binding protein are displaced by unrelated proteins with analogous activities in some lineages.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
DNA as the primary information storage molecule evolved independently in bacteria and archaea.
“The fact that the mechanisms of DNA replication in bacteria and archaea are different [133] suggests the possibility that DNA, as the primary information storage molecule, evolved independently in each of these lineages [133,134,135].”
From Opinion: The Key Steps in the Origin of Life to the Formation of the Eukaryotic Cell (2024) · cites this paper as [135]
Cites
A superfamily of conserved domains in DNA damage‐ responsive cell cycle checkpoint proteins
Bork, P., Hofmann, K., Bucher, P., Neuwald, A. F., Altschul, S. F., & Koonin, E. V. (1997) · The FASEB Journal · doi:10.1096/fasebj.11.1.9034168 · Cited by 746 · see citing works
Self-citationOn the origin of genomes and cells within inorganic compartments
Koonin, E. V., & Martin, W. (2005) · Trends in Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.tig.2005.09.006 · Cited by 406 · see citing works
Self-citationDid DNA replication evolve twice independently?
Leipe, D. D., Aravind, L., & Koonin, E. V. (1999) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/27.17.3389 · Cited by 351 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Generally, the archaeal replication protein core appears to be the same as the eukaryotic core, but eukaryotes typically possess multiple paralogous subunits within complexes that are homomeric in archaea, many additional components interacting with the core ones and more complex regulation (Leipe et al. 1999; Bell an…”
BackgroundSelf-citationGlansdorff, N., Xu, Y., & Labedan, B. (2008) · Biology Direct · doi:10.1186/1745-6150-3-29 · Cited by 264 · see citing works
Evolution of diverse cell division and vesicle formation systems in Archaea
Makarova, K. S., Yutin, N., Bell, S. D., & Koonin, E. V. (2010) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro2406 · Cited by 228 · see citing works
Self-citationThe origin of DNA genomes and DNA replication proteins
Forterre, P. (2002) · Current Opinion in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/s1369-5274(02)00360-0 · Cited by 190 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Opinion: The Key Steps in the Origin of Life to the Formation of the Eukaryotic Cell
Brunk, C. F., & Marshall, C. R. (2024) · Life · doi:10.3390/life14020226 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
“The fact that the mechanisms of DNA replication in bacteria and archaea are different [133] suggests the possibility that DNA, as the primary information storage molecule, evolved independently in each of these lineages [133–135].”
Background
- Authors
- Makarova, K. S., & Koonin, E. V.
- Affiliations
- National Institutes of Health (US)
- Venue
- Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology
- Publisher
- Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
- Published
- 2013-07-23
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- a012963-a012963
- ISSN
- 1943-0264 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC3809583
- OpenAlex
- W2143135304
- Cited by
- 87
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
- National Institutes of Health
- U.S. National Library of Medicine
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
- Keywords
- archaeal DNA replication, eukaryotic DNA replication, archaea, last common ancestor, gene duplication, paralogs, heteromeric complexes, subfunctionalization, DNA polymerase, single-stranded DNA binding protein, replisome
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Archaea, DNA-Directed DNA Polymerase, DNA Replication, DNA-Binding Proteins, Eukaryotic Cells, Humans, Phylogeny, Methanococcus, Cell Lineage, Evolution, Molecular, Genome, Archaeal, Origin Recognition Complex
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review