The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Zygotic degradation of two maternal Cdc25 mRNAs terminates Drosophila's early cell cycle program.
Open accessAbstract
In Drosophila embryos the maternal/zygotic transition (MZT) in cell cycle control normally follows mitosis 13. Here we show that this transition requires degradation of two maternal mRNAs, string and twine, which encode Cdc25 phosphatases. Although twine is essential for meiosis and string is essential for most mitotic cycles, the two genes have mutually complementing, overlapping functions in the female germ line and the early embryo. Deletion of both gene products from the female germ line arrests germ-line development. Reducing the maternal dose of both products can lower the number of early embryonic mitoses to 12, whereas increasing maternal Cdc25(twine) can increase the number of early mitoses to 14. Blocking the activation of zygotic transcription stabilizes maternal string and twine mRNAs and also allows an extra maternal mitosis, which is Cdc25 dependent. We propose that Drosophila's MZT comprises a chain reaction in which (1) proliferating nuclei deplete factors (probably mitotic cyclins) required for cell cycle progression; (2) this depletion causes the elongation of interphases and allows zygotic transcription; (3) new gene products accumulate that promote degradation of maternal mRNAs, including string and twine; and (4) consequent loss of Cdc25 phosphatase activity allows inhibitory phosphorylation of Cdc2 by Dwee1 kinase, effecting G2 arrest. Unlike timing or counting mechanisms, this mechanism can compensate for losses or additions of nuclei by altering the timing and number of the maternal cycles and thus will always generate the correct cell density at the MZT.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A major developmental transition in early xenopus embryos: II. control of the onset of transcription
Newport, J., & Kirschner, M. (1982) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(82)90273-2 · Cited by 1,055
Progression of the cell cycle through mitosis leads to abortion of nascent transcripts
Shermoen, A. W., & O'Farrell, P. H. (1991) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(91)90182-x · Cited by 360
Cited by
p27Kip1 links cell proliferation to morphogenesis in the developing organ of Corti
Chen, P., & Segil, N. (1999) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.126.8.1581 · Cited by 555
Mechanisms regulating zygotic genome activation
Schulz, K. N., & Harrison, M. M. (2019) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41576-018-0087-x · Cited by 555
Tadros, W., Goldman, A. L., Babak, T., Menzies, F., Vardy, L., Orr-Weaver, T., Hughes, T. R., Westwood, J. T., Smibert, C. A., & Lipshitz, H. D. (2007) · Developmental Cell · doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2006.10.005 · Cited by 330
Unmasking Activation of the Zygotic Genome Using Chromosomal Deletions in the Drosophila Embryo
De Renzis, S., Elemento, O., Tavazoie, S., & Wieschaus, E. F. (2007) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0050117 · Cited by 265
Audic, Y., Omilli, F., & Osborne, H. B. (1997) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.17.1.209 · Cited by 73
Metadata
- Authors
- Edgar, B. A., & Datar, S. A.
- Venue
- Genes & Development
- Publisher
- Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
- Published
- 1996-08-01
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 15
- Pages
- 1966-1977
- ISSN
- 0890-9369 (ISSN-L)
- 1549-5477
- OpenAlex
- W2154551082
- Cited by
- 160
- References
- 2
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Zygotic degradation of two maternal Cdc25 mRNAs terminates Drosophila's early cell cycle program. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1101/gad.10.15.1966
- The paper
- Edgar, B. A., & Datar, S. A. (1996). Zygotic degradation of two maternal Cdc25 mRNAs terminates Drosophila's early cell cycle program. Genes & Development. https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.10.15.1966
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.