Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 258

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A two-cilia model for vertebrate left-right axis specification: Figure 1.

Open access
Tabin, Clifford J., Vogan, Kyle J.·2003·Genes & Development

Abstract

The mechanisms underlying vertebrate left-right (L-R) axis specification have attracted much interest among developmental biologists (for review, see Burdine and Schier 2000; Capdevila et al. 2000). Of particular interest from a conceptual standpoint is the question of how L-R positional information first originates within the context of a bilaterally symmetric embryo. To achieve the consistent L-R handedness characteristic of the vertebrate body plan, the L-R axis must be reliably oriented with respect to the other two embryonic axes, anteroposterior (A-P) and dorsoventral (D-V; Brown and Wolpert 1990). Understanding how embryos achieve this goal without reference to any external cues represents a formidable challenge for embryologists and theoretical biologists alike. The first breakthrough in understanding the molecular basis of handed asymmetry was the discovery of a cascade of signals produced asymmetrically in the early embryo that was sufficient to direct the orientation of later L-R morphogenetic events (Levin et al. 1995). This, together with subsequent reports identifying additional genes expressed asymmetrically in the early embryo, opened the door to ongoing work directed at understanding how L-R positional information is propagated in the embryo as well as how this information is ultimately translated into morphological manifestations of L-R asymmetry (for review, see Burdine and Schier 2000; Capdevila et al. 2000). Perhaps most important, however, were the general patterns of asymmetric gene expression first reported by Levin et al. (1995)—initial tightly localized domains of asymmetric gene expression at the chick node (ActRIIa, Shh, and then Nodal medially) followed by broad domains of asymmetric gene expression throughout the lateral plate (Nodal in the left lateral plate mesoderm). Significantly, although some of the specific molecular players appear to vary across different species, the node has consistently been the location where the earliest molecular asymmetries are centered, drawing attention to this region as the most likely site for the initial symmetry breaking event responsible for specifying the orientation of the L-R axis (Vogan and Tabin 1999; Capdevila et al. 2000). The precise manner in which asymmetric gene expression might first be established, however, remained a mystery until a second breakthrough discovery documenting the existence of motile monocilia and directional fluid flow at the mouse node (Nonaka et al. 1998).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/gad.1053803

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 258

Metadata

Authors
Tabin, C. J., & Vogan, K. J.
Venue
Genes & Development
Published
2003-01-01
Volume
17
Issue
1
Pages
1-6
ISSN
  • 0890-9369 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-5477
OpenAlex
W2115680883
Cited by
258
References
2
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
diamond

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A two-cilia model for vertebrate left-right axis specification: Figure 1. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1101/gad.1053803
The paper
Tabin, C. J., & Vogan, K. J. (2003). A two-cilia model for vertebrate left-right axis specification: Figure 1. Genes & Development. https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.1053803

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.