Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 196

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

p63 and the epithelial stem cell: more than status quo?

Open access
McKeon, Frank·2004·Genes & Development

Abstract

The discovery of p63, the most ancient member of the p53 family (for review, see Yang et al. 2002), was soon followed by back-to-back reports of a remarkable phenotype of mice lacking this gene: They die perinatally due to the absence of a large number of epithelial structures including skin, breast, prostate, and urothelia, among others (Mills et al. 1999; Yang et al. 1999). Despite the contemporaneous nature of these publications, they expressed profound disagreement regarding the function of p63, as reflected in the mouse mutants. Mills et al. (1999) argued that p63 was essential for the commitment of a simple ectoderm to epidermal lineages, whereas Yang et al. (1999) argued that commitment and differentiation of the ectoderm were essentially intact in these mice, and that what was defective was the “proliferative potential” of the epithelial stem cells (Fig. 1). Principals from the first group have now addressed this problem from fundamentally different angles and have proposed new and unexpected functions of the p63 gene in epithelial commitment, maintenance, and differentiation (Koster et al. 2004).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/gad.1190504

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 196

Metadata

Authors
McKeon, F.
Venue
Genes & Development
Published
2004-03-01
Volume
18
Issue
5
Pages
465-469
ISSN
  • 0890-9369 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-5477
OpenAlex
W2017967880
Cited by
196
References
0
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
diamond

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: p63 and the epithelial stem cell: more than status quo? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1101/gad.1190504
The paper
McKeon, F. (2004). p63 and the epithelial stem cell: more than status quo? Genes & Development. https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.1190504

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.