The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Identification of functional exonic splicing enhancer motifs recognized by individual SR proteins
Open accessAbstract
Using an in vitro randomization and functional selection procedure, we have identified three novel classes of exonic splicing enhancers (ESEs) recognized by human SF2/ASF, SRp40, and SRp55, respectively. These ESEs are functional in splicing and are highly specific. For SF2/ASF and SRp55, in most cases, only the cognate SR protein can efficiently recognize an ESE and activate splicing. In contrast, the SRp40-selected ESEs can function with either SRp40 or SRp55, but not with SF2/ASF. UV cross-linking/competition and immunoprecipitation experiments showed that SR proteins recognize their cognate ESEs in nuclear extract by direct and specific binding. A motif search algorithm was used to derive consensus sequences for ESEs recognized by these SR proteins. Each SR protein yielded a distinct 5- to 7-nucleotide degenerate consensus. These three consensus sequences occur at higher frequencies in exons than in introns and may thus help define exon–intron boundaries. They occur in clusters within regions corresponding to naturally occurring, mapped ESEs. We conclude that a remarkably diverse set of sequences can function as ESEs. The degeneracy of these motifs is consistent with the fact that exonic enhancers evolved within extremely diverse protein coding sequences and are recognized by a small number of SR proteins that bind RNA with limited sequence specificity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Mechanisms of Alternative Pre-Messenger RNA Splicing
Black, D. L. (2003) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev.biochem.72.121801.161720 · Cited by 2,704
Listening to silence and understanding nonsense: exonic mutations that affect splicing
Cartegni, L., Chew, S. L., & Krainer, A. R. (2002) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg775 · Cited by 2,209
Self-citationESEfinder: a web resource to identify exonic splicing enhancers
Cartegni, L. (2003) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkg616 · Cited by 1,603
Understanding alternative splicing: towards a cellular code
Matlin, A. J., Clark, F., & Smith, C. W. J. (2005) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm1645 · Cited by 1,305
Pre-mRNA splicing and human disease
Faustino, N. A., & Cooper, T. A. (2003) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.1048803 · Cited by 1,256
Metadata
- Authors
- Liu, H.-X., Zhang, M., & Krainer, A. R.
- Venue
- Genes & Development
- Publisher
- Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
- Published
- 1998-07-01
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- 1998-2012
- ISSN
- 0890-9369 (ISSN-L)
- 1549-5477
- OpenAlex
- W2102337459
- Cited by
- 510
- References
- 0
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Identification of functional exonic splicing enhancer motifs recognized by individual SR proteins. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1101/gad.12.13.1998
- The paper
- Liu, H.-X., Zhang, M., & Krainer, A. R. (1998). Identification of functional exonic splicing enhancer motifs recognized by individual SR proteins. Genes & Development. https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.12.13.1998
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.