CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1,815Genomics and Chromatin DynamicsHistone Deacetylase Inhibitors ResearchEpigenetics and DNA Methylation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 59 of the 61 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Histone acetylation and transcriptional regulatory mechanisms

Open access
Struhl, K.·1998·Genes & Development
DOI 10.1101/gad.12.5.599
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

More than 30 years ago, Vincent Allfrey proposed that histone acetylation was associated with transcriptional activity in eukaryotic cells (Allfrey et al. 1964; Pogo et al. 1966). Subsequently, acetylated core histones were shown to preferentially associate with transcriptionally active chromatin (Sealy and Chalkley 1978; Vidali et al. 1978; Hebbes et al. 1988). Acetylation occurs at lysine residues on the amino-terminal tails of the histones, thereby neutralizing the positive charge of the histone tails and decreasing their affinity for DNA (Hong et al. 1993). As a consequence, histone acetylation alters nucleosomal conformation (Norton et al. 1989), which can increase the accessibility of transcriptional regulatory proteins to chromatin templates (Lee et al. 1993; Vettese-Dadey et al. 1996). Taken together, these observations suggested how histone acetylation could result in increased transcriptional activity in vivo. However, there was essentially no information about the cause and effect relationship between histone acetylation and transcriptional activity or about the underlying molecular mechanisms. A mechanistic and physiologically relevant connection between histone acetylation and transcriptional regulation was initially provided by two independent lines of evidence. First, yeast cells unable to acetylate the histone H4 tail because of mutations of the target lysine residues show altered patterns of transcription (Durrin et al. 1991). However, these mutations broadly affect chromatin structure in vivo, and hence are likely to influence other molecular processes involving DNA (e.g., DNA replication and repair, recombination, chromosome segregation). Second, treatment of mammalian cells with potent inhibitors of histone deacetylase activity such as trapoxin or trichostatin A resulted in increased expression of a variety of genes (Yoshida et al. 1995). However, these drugs might inhibit other cellular targets, and they affect a variety of cellular processes, including cell proliferation, apoptosis, differentiation, and DNA synthesis. Although these observations were suggestive, understanding of the relationship between chromatin structure and transcription regulation was hampered significantly by a lack of knowledge about the enzymes that acetylate and deacetylate histones. In the past 2 years, our understanding of the causal relationship between histone acetylation and gene expression has been enhanced dramatically by the identification of proteins with intrinsic histone acetylase and deacetylase activity (Brownell et al. 1996; for recent reviews, see Grunstein 1997; Pazin and Kadonaga 1997; Wade et al. 1997). Of particular significance, some of these enzymes had been identified previously as components of the RNA polymerase II (Pol II) transcription machinery itself, proteins that associate with transcriptional regulatory factors, or proteins that positively or negatively affect transcription in vivo. These discoveries have led to a major paradigm shift. It is now clear that chromatin structure and modification can not be viewed as a process that is independent of transcriptional initiation, that is, chromatin is not simply a structure that serves to compact DNA in the nucleus and provide a relatively passive substrate for the action of transcription factors. Instead, histone acetylases and deacetylases provide a critical link between chromatin structure and transcriptional output, and this link is now accessible to experimental intervention. This review will focus on molecular mechanisms by which histone acetylation affects transcriptional activity in living cells.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/gad.12.5.599

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 61 references

2 of the 61 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Rundlett, S.E., A.A. Carmen, R. Kobayashi, S. Bavykin, B.M. Turner, and M. Grunstein. 1996. HDA1 and RPD3 are mem- bers of distinct yeast histone deacetylase complexes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 93: 14503-14508.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 301–400 of 1,002

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Struhl, K.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Struhl, K.
ORCID
Struhl, K.
Venue
Genes & Development
Publisher
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Published
1998-03-01
Volume
12
Issue
5
Pages
599-606
ISSN
0890-9369 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1101/gad.12.5.599
OpenAlex
W2106900373
Cited by
1,815
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 40 · 2020: 40 · 2019: 45 · 2018: 48 · 2017: 65 · 2016: 51 · 2015: 48 · 2014: 57 · 2013: 49 · 2012: 47
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Genes & Development (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (GM30186)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM30186, GM-53720, R01GM053720)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
Keywords
histone acetylation, histone deacetylase, transcriptional regulation, chromatin structure, histone acetyltransferase, nucleosome conformation, histone lysine acetylation, histone methylation, histone phosphorylation, histone H3, histone H2A
MeSH terms
Acetylation, Acetylesterase, Acetyltransferases, Animals, Gene Expression Regulation, Histone Deacetylases, Histones, Models, Biological, Proteins, Transcription Factors, Transcription, Genetic, Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins, Histone Acetyltransferases

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review