The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Whose end is destruction: cell division and the anaphase-promoting complex
Open accessAbstract
Cell proliferation depends on the duplication of chromosomes followed by the segregation of duplicates (sister chromatids) to opposite poles of the cell prior to cell division (cytokinesis).How cells ensure that chromosome duplication, chromosome segregation, and cell division occur in the correct order and form an immortal reproductive cycle is one of the most fundamental questions in cell biology.Without such coordination, cells would not maintain a constant chromosome number and sexual reproduction as we know and love it would not be possible. A halfhearted cell cycleThe discovery of cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs) went some way to answering this question.Successive waves of S-and M-phase-promoting CDKs first trigger chromosome duplication (S phase)-then the attachment of the replicated chromosomes to a bipolar spindle (M phase).In animal cells, S phase is induced by Cdk2 bound to S-phase cyclins (E-and A-type) whereas M phase is triggered by Cdk1 associated with mitotic cyclins (A-and B-type).In both fission yeast and budding yeast, S and M phase are induced by a single CDK (Cdk1) bound to Sphase-and M-phase-specific B-type cyclins, respectively.We now understand many of the regulatory mechanisms that activate S-and M-CDKs in the correct order.We also have a robust hypothesis for how cells ensure that no genomic sequence is duplicated more than once during the interval between the onset of S and M phases.Initiation of DNA replication requires two distinct steps: first, prereplicative complexes (pre-RCs) are assembled at future origins of replication, a process that can occur only in the absence of CDK activity.The second step, origin unwinding and the recruitment of replication enzymes, is triggered by CDK activation.Because pre-RC assembly is inhibited by CDK activity, chromosome rereplication requires a CDK cycle, a period of low CDK activity followed by a period of high CDK activity.Having activated S-CDKs in late G 1 , cells maintain high
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The tumour suppressor protein VHL targets hypoxia-inducible factors for oxygen-dependent proteolysis
Maxwell, P. H., Wiesener, M. S., Chang, G.-W., Clifford, S. C., Vaux, E. C., Cockman, M. E., Wykoff, C. C., Pugh, C. W., Maher, E. R., & Ratcliffe, P. J. (1999) · Nature · doi:10.1038/20459 · Cited by 5,180
Control of Cyclin Ubiquitination by CDK-Regulated Binding of Hct1 to the Anaphase Promoting Complex
Zachariae, W., Schwab, M., Nasmyth, K., & Seufert, W. (1998) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.282.5394.1721 · Cited by 511
Self-citation20S cyclosome complex formation and proteolytic activity inhibited by the cAMP/PKA pathway
Yamashita, Y. M., Nakaseko, Y., Samejima, I., Kumada, K., Yamada, H., Michaelson, D., & Yanagida, M. (1996) · Nature · doi:10.1038/384276a0 · Cited by 163
Cited by
Phosphorylation meets ubiquitination: the control of NF-κB activity
Karin, M., & Ben-Neriah, Y. (2000) · Annual Review of Immunology · doi:10.1146/annurev.immunol.18.1.621 · Cited by 4,766
The SCF ubiquitin ligase: insights into a molecular machine
Cardozo, T., & Pagano, M. (2004) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm1471 · Cited by 1,114
Nasmyth, K. (2001) · Annual Review of Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev.genet.35.102401.091334 · Cited by 805
Cohesin’s binding to chromosomes depends on a separate complex consisting of Scc2 and Scc4 proteins
Ciosk, R., Shirayama, M., Shevchenko, A., Tanaka, T., Toth, A., Shevchenko, A., & Nasmyth, K. (2000) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/s1097-2765(00)80420-7 · Cited by 755
Self-citationIntegrative Analysis of Cell Cycle Control in Budding Yeast
Chen, K. C., Calzone, L., Csikasz-Nagy, A., Cross, F. R., Novak, B., & Tyson, J. J. (2004) · Molecular Biology of the Cell · doi:10.1091/mbc.e03-11-0794 · Cited by 632
Metadata
- Authors
- Zachariae, W., & Nasmyth, K.
- Venue
- Genes & Development
- Publisher
- Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
- Published
- 1999-08-15
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 16
- Pages
- 2039-2058
- ISSN
- 0890-9369 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2033141310
- Cited by
- 670
- References
- 3
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Whose end is destruction: cell division and the anaphase-promoting complex. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1101/gad.13.16.2039
- The paper
- Zachariae, W., & Nasmyth, K. (1999). Whose end is destruction: cell division and the anaphase-promoting complex. Genes & Development. https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.13.16.2039
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.