Cited by 426Developmental Biology and Gene RegulationCongenital limb and hand anomaliesCongenital heart defects research

Role of the Bicoid-related homeodomain factor Pitx1 in specifying hindlimb morphogenesis and pituitary development

Open access
Szeto, D. P., Rodriguez-Esteban, C., Ryan, A. K., O'Connell, S. M., Liu, F., Kioussi, C., Gleiberman, A. S., Izpisua-Belmonte, J. C. +1 more·1999·Genes & Development

Abstract

Pitx1 is a Bicoid-related homeodomain factor that exhibits preferential expression in the hindlimb, as well as expression in the developing anterior pituitary gland and first branchial arch. Here, we report that Pitx1 gene-deleted mice exhibit striking abnormalities in morphogenesis and growth of the hindlimb, resulting in a limb that exhibits structural changes in tibia and fibula as well as patterning alterations in patella and proximal tarsus, to more closely resemble the corresponding forelimb structures. Deletion of the Pitx1 locus results in decreased distal expression of the hindlimb-specific marker, the T-box factor, Tbx4. On the basis of similar expression patterns in chick, targeted misexpression of chick Pitx1 in the developing wing bud causes the resulting limb to assume altered digit number and morphogenesis, with Tbx4 induction. We hypothesize that Pitx1 serves to critically modulate morphogenesis, growth, and potential patterning of a specific hindlimb region, serving as a component of the morphological and growth distinctions in forelimb and hindlimb identity. Pitx1 gene-deleted mice also exhibit reciprocal abnormalities of two ventral and one dorsal anterior pituitary cell types, presumably on the basis of its synergistic functions with other transcription factors, and defects in the derivatives of the first branchial arch, including cleft palate, suggesting a proliferative defect in these organs analogous to that observed in the hindlimb.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/gad.13.4.484

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In amniotes, pitx1 operates in the patterning system for hind limb appendage subparts, and forced expression in forelimb buds transforms them into hindlimbs.

    “In amniotes pitx1 operates in the patterning system that organizes the subparts of the appendages developing from the hind limb buds, and forced expression in forelimb buds transforms them into hindlimbs (Logan and Tabin, 1999; Szeto et al., 1999).”

    From Evolution of Gene Regulatory Networks Controlling Body Plan Development (2011) · cites this paper as Szeto et al., 1999

    The Discussion supports a role for Pitx1 in hindlimb-specific patterning and morphogenesis. But the Effects of cPitx1 misexpression section reports only leg-like changes in infected chick wings, mainly in their distal parts; it does not report that the forelimb buds transform into hindlimbs. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. McDonald, M.T. and J.L. Gorski. 1993. Nager acrofacial dysos- tosis. J. Med. Genet. 30(9): 779-782.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Szeto, D. P., Rodriguez-Esteban, C., Ryan, A. K., O'Connell, S. M., Liu, F., Kioussi, C., Gleiberman, A. S., Izpisua-Belmonte, J. C., & Rosenfeld, M. G.
Affiliations
Salk Institute for Biological Studies (US)
Venue
Genes & Development
Published
1999-02-15
Volume
13
Issue
4
Pages
484-494
ISSN
0890-9369 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2167963456
Cited by
426
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 16
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Genes & Development (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  • Consorzio Interuniversitario Biotecnologie
  • National Institutes of Health
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology › Congenital limb and hand anomalies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Congenital heart defects research
Keywords
PITX1, anterior pituitary development, TBX4, limb growth, cleft palate, first branchial arch, chick wing bud, transcriptional regulation
MeSH terms
Homeobox Protein PITX2, Animals, Branchial Region, Chick Embryo, Hindlimb, Immunohistochemistry, Mandible, Morphogenesis, Nuclear Proteins, Pituitary Gland, Transcription Factors, Wings, Animal, Trans-Activators, Gene Deletion, In Situ Hybridization, Mice, Knockout, Homeodomain Proteins, Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental, T-Box Domain Proteins, Drosophila Proteins, Avian Proteins, Mice, Paired Box Transcription Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review