The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Histone sumoylation is a negative regulator in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and shows dynamic interplay with positive-acting histone modifications
Open accessAbstract
Covalent histone post-translational modifications such as acetylation, methylation, phosphorylation, and ubiquitylation play pivotal roles in regulating many cellular processes, including transcription, response to DNA damage, and epigenetic control. Although positive-acting post-translational modifications have been studied in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , histone modifications that are associated with transcriptional repression have not been shown to occur in this yeast. Here, we provide evidence that histone sumoylation negatively regulates transcription in S. cerevisiae . We show that all four core histones are sumoylated and identify specific sites of sumoylation in histones H2A, H2B, and H4. We demonstrate that histone sumoylation sites are involved directly in transcriptional repression. Further, while histone sumoylation occurs at all loci tested throughout the genome, slightly higher levels occur proximal to telomeres. We observe a dynamic interplay between histone sumoylation and either acetylation or ubiquitylation, where sumoylation serves as a potential block to these activating modifications. These results indicate that sumoylation is the first negative histone modification to be identified in S. cerevisiae and further suggest that sumoylation may serve as a general dynamic mark to oppose transcription.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Methylation of histone H3 lysine 9 creates a binding site for HP1 proteins
Lachner, M., O'Carroll, D., Rea, S., Mechtler, K., & Jenuwein, T. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35065132 · Cited by 2,868
A Mammalian Histone Deacetylase Related to the Yeast Transcriptional Regulator Rpd3p
Taunton, J., Hassig, C. A., & Schreiber, S. L. (1996) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.272.5260.408 · Cited by 1,829
Structure and ligand of a histone acetyltransferase bromodomain
Dhalluin, C., Carlson, J. E., Zeng, L., He, C., Aggarwal, A. K., Zhou, M.-M., & Zhou, M.-M. (1999) · Nature · doi:10.1038/20974 · Cited by 1,732
Heterochromatin and Epigenetic Control of Gene Expression
Grewal, S. I. S., & Moazed, D. (2003) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1086887 · Cited by 1,065
Henry, K. W., Wyce, A., Lo, W.-S., Duggan, L. J., Emre, N. C. T., Kao, C.-F., Pillus, L., Shilatifard, A., Osley, M. A., & Berger, S. L. (2003) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.1144003 · Cited by 714
Self-citationSUMO-1 modification of histone deacetylase 1 (HDAC1) modulates its biological activities
David, G., Neptune, M. A., & DePinho, R. A. (2002) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m203690200 · Cited by 236 · cited 4×
“A third possible mechanism would involve activation of HDACs by sumoylation, which was previously observed ( David et al. 2002; Cheng et al. 2004); thus, lowered HDAC sumoylation (particularly in the SUMO pathway mutant strains) may indirectly lead to higher histone acetylation.”
BackgroundInfluential
Cited by
Chromatin modifications and their function
Kouzarides, T. (2007) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2007.02.005 · Cited by 10,883
“In contrast, H2BK120 ubiquitylation is mediated by human RNF20/RNF40 and UbcH6 and in budding yeast by Rad6/Bre1 and is activatory for transcription (Zhu et al., 2005).”
InfluentialRegulation of chromatin by histone modifications
Bannister, A. J., & Kouzarides, T. (2011) · Cell Research · doi:10.1038/cr.2011.22 · Cited by 6,012
Epigenetic regulation of stress responses in plants
Chinnusamy, V., & Zhu, J.-K. (2009) · Current Opinion in Plant Biology · doi:10.1016/j.pbi.2008.12.006 · Cited by 1,162
Regulation of nucleosome dynamics by histone modifications
Zentner, G. E., & Henikoff, S. (2013) · Nature Structural & Molecular Biology · doi:10.1038/nsmb.2470 · Cited by 923
System-Wide Changes to SUMO Modifications in Response to Heat Shock
Golebiowski, F., Matic, I., Tatham, M. H., Cole, C., Yin, Y., Nakamura, A., Cox, J., Barton, G. J., Mann, M., & Hay, R. T. (2009) · Science Signaling · doi:10.1126/scisignal.2000282 · Cited by 485
Metadata
- Authors
- Nathan, D., Ingvarsdottir, K., Sterner, D. E., Bylebyl, G. R., Dokmanovic, M., Dorsey, J. A., Whelan, K. A., Krsmanovic, M., Lane, W. S., Meluh, P. B., Johnson, E. S., & Berger, S. L.
- Venue
- Genes & Development
- Publisher
- Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
- Published
- 2006-04-05
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 966-976
- ISSN
- 0890-9369 (ISSN-L)
- 1549-5477
- OpenAlex
- W2130345393
- Cited by
- 344
- References
- 6
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Histone sumoylation is a negative regulator in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and shows dynamic interplay with positive-acting histone modifications. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1101/gad.1404206
- The paper
- Nathan, D., Ingvarsdottir, K., Sterner, D. E., Bylebyl, G. R., Dokmanovic, M., Dorsey, J. A., Whelan, K. A., Krsmanovic, M., Lane, W. S., Meluh, P. B., Johnson, E. S., & Berger, S. L. (2006). Histone sumoylation is a negative regulator in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and shows dynamic interplay with positive-acting histone modifications. Genes & Development. https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.1404206
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.