The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Three subclasses of a Drosophila insulator show distinct and cell type-specific genomic distributions
Open accessAbstract
Insulators are protein-bound DNA elements that are thought to play a role in chromatin organization and the regulation of gene expression by mediating intra- and interchromosomal interactions. Suppressor of Hair-wing [Su(Hw)] and Drosophila CTCF (dCTCF) insulators are found at distinct loci throughout the Drosophila melanogaster genome and function by recruiting an additional protein, Centrosomal Protein 190 (CP190). We performed chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) and microarray analysis (ChIP–chip) experiments with whole-genome tiling arrays to compare Su(Hw), dCTCF, boundary element-associated factor (BEAF), and CP190 localization on DNA in two different cell lines and found evidence that BEAF is a third subclass of CP190-containing insulators. The DNA-binding proteins Su(Hw), dCTCF, and BEAF show unique distribution patterns with respect to the location and expression level of genes, suggesting diverse roles for these three subclasses of insulators in genome organization. Notably, cell line-specific localization sites for all three DNA-binding proteins as well as CP190 indicate multiple levels at which insulators can be regulated to affect gene expression. These findings suggest a model in which insulator subclasses may have distinct functions that together organize the genome in a cell type-specific manner, resulting in differential regulation of gene expression.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
DAVID: Database for Annotation, Visualization, and Integrated Discovery
Dennis, G., Sherman, B. T., Hosack, D. A., Yang, J., Gao, W., Lane, H. C., & Lempicki, R. A. (2003) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2003-4-5-p3 · Cited by 9,327
Methylation of a CTCF-dependent boundary controls imprinted expression of the Igf2 gene
Bell, A. C., & Felsenfeld, G. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35013100 · Cited by 1,746
CTCF mediates long-range chromatin looping and local histone modification in the β-globin locus
Splinter, E., Heath, H., Kooren, J., Palstra, R.-J., Klous, P., Grosveld, F., Galjart, N., & de Laat, W. (2006) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.399506 · Cited by 677
Cuddapah, S., Jothi, R., Schones, D. E., Roh, T.-Y., Cui, K., & Zhao, K. (2009) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.082800.108 · Cited by 637 · cited 3×
“Similar percentages of cell type-specific binding sites were observed for vertebrate CTCF between different cell lines (Kim et al. 2007; Cuddapah et al. 2009).”
BackgroundMurrell, A., Heeson, S., & Reik, W. (2004) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng1402 · Cited by 556 · cited 1×
“More specifically, CTCFdependent loop formation that is necessary for allelespecific transcription has been observed within the mouse b-globin locus and at the imprinting control region (ICR) in the H19/Igf2 locus (Murrell et al. 2004; Kurukuti et al. 2006; Splinter et al. 2006; Yoon et al. 2007).”
BackgroundKurukuti, S., Tiwari, V. K., Tavoosidana, G., Pugacheva, E., Murrell, A., Zhao, Z., Lobanenkov, V., Reik, W., & Ohlsson, R. (2006) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0600326103 · Cited by 511
Gateff, E. (1978) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.96525 · Cited by 461 · cited 1×
“To test this possibility we performed ChIP–chip analysis using Mbn2 cells, a tumorous hematopoietic cell line derived from D. melanogaster larvae (Gateff 1978), for each of the four insulator proteins used in this study; data were then compared with those obtained with embryonic Kc cells derived…”
MethodCTCF-dependent enhancer-blocking by alternative chromatin loop formation
Hou, C., Zhao, H., Tanimoto, K., & Dean, A. (2008) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0808506106 · Cited by 205
Cited by
Systematic Protein Location Mapping Reveals Five Principal Chromatin Types in Drosophila Cells
Filion, G. J., van Bemmel, J. G., Braunschweig, U., Talhout, W., Kind, J., Ward, L. D., Brugman, W., de Castro, I. J., Kerkhoven, R. M., Bussemaker, H. J., et al. (2010) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2010.09.009 · Cited by 964
Hou, C., Li, L., Qin, Z. S., & Corces, V. G. (2012) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2012.08.031 · Cited by 512
Self-citationPolycomb-dependent regulatory contacts between distant Hox loci in Drosophila
Bantignies, F., Roure, V., Comet, I., Leblanc, B., Schuettengruber, B., Bonnet, J., Tixier, V., Mas, A., & Cavalli, G. (2011) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2010.12.026 · Cited by 429
A Comprehensive Map of Insulator Elements for the Drosophila Genome
Nègre, N., Brown, C. D., Shah, P. K., Kheradpour, P., Morrison, C. A., Henikoff, J. G., Feng, X., Ahmad, K., Russell, S., White, R. A. H., et al. (2010) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000814 · Cited by 329
Chen, H., Tian, Y., Shu, W., Bo, X., & Wang, S. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0041374 · Cited by 161
Metadata
- Authors
- Bushey, A. M., Ramos, E., & Corces, V. G.
- Venue
- Genes & Development
- Publisher
- Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
- Published
- 2009-05-14
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1338-1350
- ISSN
- 0890-9369 (ISSN-L)
- 1549-5477
- OpenAlex
- W2161638097
- Cited by
- 189
- References
- 8
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Three subclasses of a Drosophila insulator show distinct and cell type-specific genomic distributions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1101/gad.1798209
- The paper
- Bushey, A. M., Ramos, E., & Corces, V. G. (2009). Three subclasses of a Drosophila insulator show distinct and cell type-specific genomic distributions. Genes & Development. https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.1798209
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.