Cited by 197Neurobiology and Insect Physiology ResearchIon Channels and ReceptorsGenetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms

Running hot and cold: behavioral strategies, neural circuits, and the molecular machinery for thermotaxis in C. elegans and Drosophila

Open access
Garrity, Paul A., Goodman, Miriam B., Samuel, Aravinthan D., Sengupta, Piali·2010·Genes & Development

Abstract

Like other ectotherms, the roundworm Caenorhabditis elegans and the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster rely on behavioral strategies to stabilize their body temperature. Both animals use specialized sensory neurons to detect small changes in temperature, and the activity of these thermosensors governs the neural circuits that control migration and accumulation at preferred temperatures. Despite these similarities, the underlying molecular, neuronal, and computational mechanisms responsible for thermotaxis are distinct in these organisms. Here, we discuss the role of thermosensation in the development and survival of C. elegans and Drosophila, and review the behavioral strategies, neuronal circuits, and molecular networks responsible for thermotaxis behavior.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/gad.1953710

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Many biological processes vary considerably over 4-5 °C, well within the range of what is normally considered room temperature.

    “because many biological processes vary considerably over 4-5 • C [40,55-59], well within the range of what is normally considered room temperature.”

    From A feature and not a bug: Replication failures can lead to new biology (2026) · cites this paper as [40]

    In “A note on terminology,” the paper says biochemical processes are affected by temperature even within an animal’s normal thermal zone. “Thermosensory regulation of development” also says locomotion, metabolism, and life span are significantly affected by ambient temperature. Our copy does not establish that many processes vary considerably over a specifically 4–5°C range considered room temperature. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Bargmann CI. 2006. Chemosensation in C. elegans. In WormBook (ed. The C. elegans Research Community). WormBook. doi: 10.1895/wormbook.1.123.1. http://www.wormbook.org. · DOI
  2. Chung SH, Clark DA, Gabel CV, Mazur E, Samuel AD. 2006. The role of the AFD neuron in C. elegans thermotaxis analyzed using femtosecond laser ablation. BMC Neurosci 7: 30. doi: 10.1186/1471-2202-7-30. · DOI
  3. Damann N, Voets T, Nilius B. 2008. TRPs in our senses. Curr Biol 18: R880-R889. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2008.07.063. · DOI
  4. Dillon ME, Wang G, Garrity PA, Huey RB. 2009. Review: Thermal preference in Drosophila. J Therm Biol 34: 109-119.
  5. Heinrich B. 1993. The hot-blooded insects: Strategies and mechanisms of thermoregulation. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
  6. Shen Y, Sarin S, Liu Y, Hobert O, Pe'er I. 2008. Comparing platforms for C. elegans mutant identification using high- throughput whole-genome sequencing. PLoS ONE 3: e4012. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0004012. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Garrity, P. A., Goodman, M. B., Samuel, A. D., & Sengupta, P.
Affiliations
  • Brandeis University (US)
  • Stanford University (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
Venue
Genes & Development
Published
2010-11-01
Volume
24
Issue
21
Pages
2365-2382
ISSN
  • 0890-9369 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-5477
OpenAlex
W2145562748
Cited by
197
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 16
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Genes & Development (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (1025307, 0725079)
  • National Institutes of Health (DP1OD004064, 5p01ns044232-10)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM081639, DP1GM105383)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (P01 NS-044232, R21NS061147)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Ion Channels and Receptors
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Aging › Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms
Keywords
thermotaxis, thermosensation, Caenorhabditis elegans, Drosophila melanogaster, thermosensory neurons, neural circuits, behavioral strategies, thermal preference, molecular networks
MeSH terms
Animals, Behavior, Animal, Cold Temperature, Drosophila melanogaster, Hot Temperature, Sensory Receptor Cells, Thermosensing, Caenorhabditis elegans, Gene Expression Profiling, Gene Regulatory Networks

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review