Cited by 125Genomics and Chromatin DynamicsHemoglobinopathies and Related DisordersChromatin Remodeling and Cancer

Role of LDB1 in the transition from chromatin looping to transcription activation

Open access
Krivega, Ivan, Dale, Ryan K., Dean, Ann·2014·Genes & Development

Abstract

Many questions remain about how close association of genes and distant enhancers occurs and how this is linked to transcription activation. In erythroid cells, lim domain binding 1 (LDB1) protein is recruited to the β-globin locus via LMO2 and is required for looping of the β-globin locus control region (LCR) to the active β-globin promoter. We show that the LDB1 dimerization domain (DD) is necessary and, when fused to LMO2, sufficient to completely restore LCR–promoter looping and transcription in LDB1-depleted cells. The looping function of the DD is unique and irreplaceable by heterologous DDs. Dissection of the DD revealed distinct functional properties of conserved subdomains. Notably, a conserved helical region (DD4/5) is dispensable for LDB1 dimerization and chromatin looping but essential for transcriptional activation. DD4/5 is required for the recruitment of the coregulators FOG1 and the nucleosome remodeling and deacetylating (NuRD) complex. Lack of DD4/5 alters histone acetylation and RNA polymerase II recruitment and results in failure of the locus to migrate to the nuclear interior, as normally occurs during erythroid maturation. These results uncouple enhancer–promoter looping from nuclear migration and transcription activation and reveal new roles for LDB1 in these processes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/gad.239749.114

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • LDB1 forms loops independently of both cohesin and CTCF.

    “In contrast to YY1 and ZNF143, LDB1 has been shown to form loops independently of both cohesin and CTCF [371, 375].”

    From Transcriptional enhancers and their communication with gene promoters (2021) · cites this paper as [375]

    The Abstract and Results (Figure 3; page not specified) show that LDB1 and its dimerization domain support β-globin LCR–promoter looping. They do not establish that this looping is independent of cohesin or CTCF; the paper discusses those proteins as factors in other looping mechanisms. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 62

  1. Blobel GA, Nakajima T, Eckner R, Montminy M, Orkin SH 1998 CREB-binding protein cooperates with transcription factor GATA-1 and is required for erythroid differentiation. Proc Natl Acad Sci 95: 2061– 2066 9482838 PMC19248
  2. Bolland DJ, King MR, Reik W, Corcoran AE, Krueger C 2013 Robust 3D DNA FISH using directly labeled probes. J Vis Exp 78: 50587 PMC3846859 23978815
  3. Brand M, Ranish JA, Kummer NT, Hamilton J, Igarashi K, Francastel C, Chi TH, Crabtree GR, Aebersold R, Groudine M 2004 Dynamic changes in transcription factor complexes during erythroid differentiation revealed by quantitative proteomics. Nat Struct Mol Biol 11: 73– 80 14718926
  4. Breen JJ, Agulnick AD, Westphal H, Dawid IB 1998 Interactions between LIM domains and the LIM domain-binding protein Ldb1. J Biol Chem 273: 4712– 4717 9468533
  5. Bulger M, Groudine M 2011 Functional and mechanistic diversity of distal transcription enhancers. Cell 144: 327– 339 21295696 PMC3742076
  6. Campbell AE, Wilkinson-White L, Mackay JP, Matthews JM, Blobel GA 2013 Analysis of disease-causing GATA1 mutations in murine gene complementation systems. Blood 121: 5218– 5227 23704091 PMC3695365
  7. Chuang CH, Carpenter AE, Fuchsova B, Johnson T, de Lanerolle P, Belmont AS 2006 Long-range directional movement of an interphase chromosome site. Curr Biol 16: 825– 831 16631592
  8. Ciovacco WA, Raskind WH, Kacena MA 2008 Human phenotypes associated with GATA-1 mutations. Gene 427: 1– 6 18930124 PMC2601579
  9. Crispino JD, Lodish MB, Mackay JP, Orkin SH 1999 Use of altered specificity mutants to probe a specific protein–protein interaction in differentiation: the GATA-1:FOG complex. Mol Cell 3: 219– 228 10078204
  10. Cross AJ, Jeffries CM, Trewhella J, Matthews JM 2010 LIM domain binding proteins 1 and 2 have different oligomeric states. J Mol Biol 399: 133– 144 20382157
  11. Datta J, Majumder S, Bai S, Ghoshal K, Kutay H, Smith DS, Crabb JW, Jacob ST 2005 Physical and functional interaction of DNA methyltransferase 3A with Mbd3 and Brg1 in mouse lymphosarcoma cells. Cancer Res 65: 10891– 10900 16322236 PMC2241737
  12. Dekker J 2008 Gene regulation in the third dimension. Science 319: 1793– 1794 18369139 PMC2666883
  13. Drissen R, Palstra RJ, Gillemans N, Splinter E, Grosveld F, Philipsen S, de Laat W 2004 The active spatial organization of the β-globin locus requires the transcription factor EKLF. Genes Dev 18: 2485– 2490 15489291 PMC529536
  14. Dundr M, Ospina JK, Sung MH, John S, Upender M, Ried T, Hager GL, Matera AG 2007 Actin-dependent intranuclear repositioning of an active gene locus in vivo. J Cell Biol 179: 1095– 1103 18070915 PMC2140015
  15. El Omari K, Hoosdally SJ, Tuladhar K, Karia D, Vyas P, Patient R, Porcher C, Mancini EJ 2011 Structure of the leukemia oncogene LMO2: implications for the assembly of a hematopoietic transcription factor complex. Blood 117: 2146– 2156 21076045
  16. Forsberg EC, Downs KM, Christensen HM, Im H, Nuzzi PA, Bresnick EH 2000 Developmentally dynamic histone acetylation pattern of a tissue-specific chromatin domain. Proc Natl Acad Sci 97: 14494– 14499 11121052 PMC18947
  17. Fujiwara T, O’Geen H, Keles S, Blahnik K, Linnemann AK, Kang YA, Choi K, Farnham PJ, Bresnick EH 2009 Discovering hematopoietic mechanisms through genome-wide analysis of GATA factor chromatin occupancy. Mol Cell 36: 667– 681 19941826 PMC2784893
  18. Hadjur S, Williams LM, Ryan NK, Cobb BS, Sexton T, Fraser P, Fisher AG, Merkenschlager M 2009 Cohesins form chromosomal cis-interactions at the developmentally regulated IFNG locus. Nature 460: 410– 413 19458616 PMC2869028
  19. Handoko L, Xu H, Li G, Ngan CY, Chew E, Schnapp M, Lee CW, Ye C, Ping JL, Mulawadi F, 2011 CTCF-mediated functional chromatin interactome in pluripotent cells. Nat Genet 43: 630– 638 21685913 PMC3436933
  20. Hassan AH, Neely KE, Workman JL 2001 Histone acetyltransferase complexes stabilize SWI/SNF binding to promoter nucleosomes. Cell 104: 817– 827 11290320
  21. Heitzler P, Vanolst L, Biryukova I, Ramain P 2003 Enhancer-promoter communication mediated by Chip during Pannier-driven proneural patterning is regulated by Osa. Genes Dev 17: 591– 596 12629041 PMC196006
  22. Hong W, Nakazawa M, Chen YY, Kori R, Vakoc CR, Rakowski C, Blobel GA 2005 FOG-1 recruits the NuRD repressor complex to mediate transcriptional repression by GATA-1. EMBO J 24: 2367– 2378 15920470 PMC1173144
  23. Hu G, Schones DE, Cui K, Ybarra R, Northrup D, Tang Q, Gattinoni L, Restifo NP, Huang S, Zhao K 2011 Regulation of nucleosome landscape and transcription factor targeting at tissue-specific enhancers by BRG1. Genome Res 21: 1650– 1658 21795385 PMC3202282
  24. Kadauke S, Blobel GA 2009 Chromatin loops in gene regulation. Biochim Biophys Acta 1789: 17– 25 18675948 PMC2638769
  25. Kiefer CM, Dean A 2012 Monitoring the effects of chromatin remodelers on long-range interactions in vivo. Methods Mol Biol 833: 29– 45 22183586
  26. Kim SI, Bultman SJ, Kiefer CM, Dean A, Bresnick EH 2009 BRG1 requirement for long-range interaction of a locus control region with a downstream promoter. Proc Natl Acad Sci 106: 2259– 2264 19171905 PMC2650142
  27. Lee HY, Johnson KD, Boyer ME, Bresnick EH 2011 Relocalizing genetic loci into specific subnuclear neighborhoods. J Biol Chem 286: 18834– 18844 21398517 PMC3099700
  28. Letting DL, Chen YY, Rakowski C, Reedy S, Blobel GA 2004 Context-dependent regulation of GATA-1 by friend of GATA-1. Proc Natl Acad Sci 101: 476– 481 14695898 PMC327172
  29. Li L, Lee JY, Gross J, Song SH, Dean A, Love PE 2010 A requirement for Lim domain binding protein 1 in erythropoiesis. J Exp Med 207: 2543– 2550 21041453 PMC2989770
  30. Li L, Freudenberg J, Cui K, Dale R, Song SH, Dean A, Zhao K, Jothi R, Love PE 2013 Ldb1-nucleated transcription complexes function as primary mediators of global erythroid gene activation. Blood 121: 4575– 4585 23610375 PMC3668490
  31. Liew CK, Simpson RJ, Kwan AH, Crofts LA, Loughlin FE, Matthews JM, Crossley M, Mackay JP 2005 Zinc fingers as protein recognition motifs: structural basis for the GATA-1/friend of GATA interaction. Proc Natl Acad Sci 102: 583– 588 15644435 PMC545545
  32. McGuffin LJ, Bryson K, Jones DT 2000 The PSIPRED protein structure prediction server. Bioinformatics 16: 404– 405 10869041
  33. Meier N, Krpic S, Rodriguez P, Strouboulis J, Monti M, Krijgsveld J, Gering M, Patient R, Hostert A, Grosveld F 2006 Novel binding partners of Ldb1 are required for haematopoietic development. Development 133: 4913– 4923 17108004
  34. Miccio A, Wang Y, Hong W, Gregory GD, Wang H, Yu X, Choi JK, Shelat S, Tong W, Poncz M, 2010 NuRD mediates activating and repressive functions of GATA-1 and FOG-1 during blood development. EMBO J 29: 442– 456 19927129 PMC2824460
  35. Mitchell JA, Fraser P 2008 Transcription factories are nuclear subcompartments that remain in the absence of transcription. Genes Dev 22: 20– 25 18172162 PMC2151011
  36. Nichols KE, Crispino JD, Poncz M, White JG, Orkin SH, Maris JM, Weiss MJ 2000 Familial dyserythropoietic anaemia and thrombocytopenia due to an inherited mutation in GATA1. Nat Genet 24: 266– 270 10700180 PMC10576470
  37. Nolis IK, McKay DJ, Mantouvalou E, Lomvardas S, Merika M, Thanos D 2009 Transcription factors mediate long-range enhancer–promoter interactions. Proc Natl Acad Sci 106: 20222– 20227 19923429 PMC2779200
  38. Osborne CS, Chakalova L, Brown KE, Carter D, Horton A, Debrand E, Goyenechea B, Mitchell JA, Lopes S, Reik W, 2004 Active genes dynamically colocalize to shared sites of ongoing transcription. Nat Genet 36: 1065– 1071 15361872
  39. Pal S, Cantor AB, Johnson KD, Moran TB, Boyer ME, Orkin SH, Bresnick EH 2004 Coregulator-dependent facilitation of chromatin occupancy by GATA-1. Proc Natl Acad Sci 101: 980– 985 14715908 PMC327128
  40. Palstra RJ, Simonis M, Klous P, Brasset E, Eijkelkamp B, de Laat W 2008 Maintenance of long-range DNA interactions after inhibition of ongoing RNA polymerase II transcription. PLoS ONE 3: e1661 18286208 PMC2243019
  41. Ragoczy T, Bender MA, Telling A, Byron R, Groudine M 2006 The locus control region is required for association of the murine β-globin locus with engaged transcription factories during erythroid maturation. Genes Dev 20: 1447– 1457 16705039 PMC1475758
  42. Ramirez-Carrozzi VR, Nazarian AA, Li CC, Gore SL, Sridharan R, Imbalzano AN, Smale ST 2006 Selective and antagonistic functions of SWI/SNF and Mi-2β nucleosome remodeling complexes during an inflammatory response. Genes Dev 20: 282– 296 16452502 PMC1361700
  43. Rodriguez P, Bonte E, Krijgsveld J, Kolodziej KE, Guyot B, Heck AJ, Vyas P, de Boer E, Grosveld F, Strouboulis J 2005 GATA-1 forms distinct activating and repressive complexes in erythroid cells. EMBO J 24: 2354– 2366 15920471 PMC1173143
  44. Sawado T, Halow J, Bender MA, Groudine M 2003 The β-globin locus control region (LCR) functions primarily by enhancing the transition from transcription initiation to elongation. Genes Dev 17: 1009– 1018 12672691 PMC196035
  45. Sekimata M, Perez-Melgosa M, Miller SA, Weinmann AS, Sabo PJ, Sandstrom R, Dorschner MO, Stamatoyannopoulos JA, Wilson CB 2009 CCCTC-binding factor and the transcription factor T-bet orchestrate T helper 1 cell-specific structure and function at the interferon-γ locus. Immunity 31: 551– 564 19818655 PMC2810421
  46. Song S-H, Kim A, Ragoczy T, Bender MA, Groudine M, Dean A 2010 Multiple functions of Ldb1 required for β-globin activation during erythroid differentiation. Blood 116: 2356– 2364 20570862 PMC2953839
  47. Splinter E, de Laat W 2011 The complex transcription regulatory landscape of our genome: control in three dimensions. EMBO J 30: 4345– 4355 21952046 PMC3230377
  48. Stadhouders R, Thongjuea S, Andrieu-Soler C, Palstra RJ, Bryne JC, van den Heuvel A, Stevens M, de Boer E, Kockx C, van der Sloot A, 2012 Dynamic long-range chromatin interactions control Myb proto-oncogene transcription during erythroid development. EMBO J 31: 986– 999 22157820 PMC3280550
  49. Terano T, Zhong Y, Toyokuni S, Hiai H, Yamada Y 2005 Transcriptional control of fetal liver hematopoiesis: dominant negative effect of the overexpression of the LIM domain mutants of LMO2. Exp Hematol 33: 641– 651 15911088
  50. Thaler JP, Lee SK, Jurata LW, Gill GN, Pfaff SL 2002 LIM factor Lhx3 contributes to the specification of motor neuron and interneuron identity through cell-type-specific protein–protein interactions. Cell 110: 237– 249 12150931
  51. Tripic T, Deng W, Cheng Y, Zhang Y, Vakoc CR, Gregory GD, Hardison RC, Blobel GA 2009 SCL and associated proteins distinguish active from repressive GATA transcription factor complexes. Blood 113: 2191– 2201 19011221 PMC2652367
  52. Tsang AP, Visvader JE, Turner CA, Fujiwara Y, Yu C, Weiss MJ, Crossley M, Orkin SH 1997 FOG, a multitype zinc finger protein, acts as a cofactor for transcription factor GATA-1 in erythroid and megakaryocytic differentiation. Cell 90: 109– 119 9230307
  53. Vakoc CR, Letting DL, Gheldof N, Sawado T, Bender MA, Groudine M, Weiss MJ, Dekker J, Blobel GA 2005 Proximity among distant regulatory elements at the β-globin locus requires GATA-1 and FOG-1. Mol Cell 17: 453– 462 15694345
  54. van Meyel DJ, O’Keefe DD, Jurata LW, Thor S, Gill GN, Thomas JB 1999 Chip and apterous physically interact to form a functional complex during Drosophila development. Mol Cell 4: 259– 265 10488341
  55. von Lindern M, Deiner EM, Dolznig H, Parren-Van AM, Hayman MJ, Mullner EW, Beug H 2001 Leukemic transformation of normal murine erythroid progenitors: v- and c-ErbB act through signaling pathways activated by the EpoR and c-Kit in stress erythropoiesis. Oncogene 20: 3651– 3664 11439328
  56. Wadman IA, Osada H, Grutz GG, Agulnick AD, Westphal H, Forster A, Rabbitts TH 1997 The LIM-only protein Lmo2 is a bridging molecule assembling an erythroid, DNA-binding complex which includes the TAL1, E47, GATA-1 and Ldb1/NLI proteins. EMBO J 16: 3145– 3157 9214632 PMC1169933
  57. Wilkinson-White L, Gamsjaeger R, Dastmalchi S, Wienert B, Stokes PH, Crossley M, Mackay JP, Matthews JM 2011 Structural basis of simultaneous recruitment of the transcriptional regulators LMO2 and FOG1/ZFPM1 by the transcription factor GATA1. Proc Natl Acad Sci 108: 14443– 14448 21844373 PMC3167507
  58. Xu Z, Huang S, Chang LS, Agulnick AD, Brandt SJ 2003 Identification of a TAL1 target gene reveals a positive role for the LIM domain-binding protein Ldb1 in erythroid gene expression and differentiation. Mol Cell Biol 23: 7585– 7599 14560005 PMC207591
  59. Yildirim O, Li R, Hung JH, Chen PB, Dong X, Ee LS, Weng Z, Rando OJ, Fazzio TG 2011 Mbd3/NURD complex regulates expression of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine marked genes in embryonic stem cells. Cell 147: 1498– 1510 22196727 PMC3252821
  60. Yu M, Riva L, Xie H, Schindler Y, Moran TB, Cheng Y, Yu D, Hardison R, Weiss MJ, Orkin SH, 2009 Insights into GATA-1-mediated gene activation versus repression via genome-wide chromatin occupancy analysis. Mol Cell 36: 682– 695 19941827 PMC2800995
  61. Yusufzai TM, Tagami H, Nakatani Y, Felsenfeld G 2004 CTCF tethers an insulator to subnuclear sites, suggesting shared insulator mechanisms across species. Mol Cell 13: 291– 298 14759373
  62. Zeng PY, Vakoc CR, Chen ZC, Blobel GA, Berger SL 2006 In vivo dual cross-linking for identification of indirect DNA-associated proteins by chromatin immunoprecipitation. Biotechniques 41: 694– 698 17191611

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Krivega, I., Dale, R. K., & Dean, A.
Affiliations
National Institutes of Health (US)
Corresponding author
Dean, Ann
Venue
Genes & Development
Published
2014-05-29
Volume
28
Issue
12
Pages
1278-1290
ISSN
  • 0890-9369 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-5477
OpenAlex
W2114438477
Cited by
125
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 4
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Genes & Development (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (DK015508, ZIADK015508)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics › Hemoglobinopathies and Related Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Chromatin Remodeling and Cancer
Keywords
LDB1, LMO2, chromatin looping, enhancer-promoter looping, transcriptional activation, beta-globin locus control region, erythroid cells, FOG-1, NuRD complex, histone acetylation, RNA polymerase II recruitment, nuclear migration
MeSH terms
Animals, Cell Nucleus, Cells, Cultured, Chromatin, DNA-Binding Proteins, Nuclear Proteins, Transcription Factors, Transcriptional Activation, Gene Deletion, Dimerization, Erythroid Cells, Cell Line, Tumor, Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing, Mice, beta-Globins, LIM Domain Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review