Cited by 151

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Calcium-dependent O-GlcNAc signaling drives liver autophagy in adaptation to starvation

Ruan, Hai-Bin, Ma, Yina, Torres, Sara, Zhang, Bichen, Feriod, Colleen, Heck, Ryan M., Qian, Kevin, Fu, Minnie, Li, Xiuqi, Nathanson, Michael H., Bennett, Anton M., Nie, Yongzhan, Ehrlich, Barbara E., Yang, Xiaoyong·2017·Genes & Development

Abstract

Starvation induces liver autophagy, which is thought to provide nutrients for use by other organs and thereby maintain whole-body homeostasis. Here we demonstrate that O-linked β-N-acetylglucosamine (O-GlcNAc) transferase (OGT) is required for glucagon-stimulated liver autophagy and metabolic adaptation to starvation. Genetic ablation of OGT in mouse livers reduces autophagic flux and the production of glucose and ketone bodies. Upon glucagon-induced calcium signaling, calcium/calmodulin-dependent kinase II (CaMKII) phosphorylates OGT, which in turn promotes O-GlcNAc modification and activation of Ulk proteins by potentiating AMPK-dependent phosphorylation. These findings uncover a signaling cascade by which starvation promotes autophagy through OGT phosphorylation and establish the importance of O-GlcNAc signaling in coupling liver autophagy to nutrient homeostasis.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/gad.305441.117

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 10 references

Research works printed but not linked: 51

  1. 10.1128/MCB.06159-11 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1073/pnas.1200425109 · DOI
  3. 1968, Studies on cellular autophagocytosis. The formation of autophagic vacuoles in the liver after glucagon administration, Am J Pathol, 53, 687
  4. 10.1073/pnas.0912658106 · DOI
  5. 10.1146/annurev-nutr-071812-161240 · DOI
  6. 10.1074/jbc.M113.523068 · DOI
  7. 10.1074/jbc.M801222200 · DOI
  8. 10.1016/j.jhep.2013.02.031 · DOI
  9. 10.1111/j.1463-1326.2011.01449.x · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.4161/auto.7.12.17909 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1126/science.1196371 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1038/nature12537 · DOI
  13. 10.4161/auto.7.7.15371 · DOI
  14. 10.1152/ajpendo.00236.2014 · DOI
  15. 2017, Hepatic inositol 1,4,5 trisphosphate receptor type 1 mediates fatty liver, Hepatol Commun, 1, 23, 10.1002/hep4.1012 · DOI
  16. 10.1210/en.2005-0523 · DOI
  17. 10.1038/ncb3066 · DOI
  18. 10.1038/nrm3334 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1146/annurev-biochem-060608-102511 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1016/j.cell.2010.12.001 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1152/ajpendo.00492.2002 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 2014, O-GlcNAcylation and metabolic reprograming in cancer, Front Endocrinol, 5, 145
  23. 10.1074/jbc.M109.026351 · DOI
  24. 10.1093/jb/mvs059 · DOI
  25. 10.1016/j.cmet.2012.12.015 · DOI
  26. 10.1126/science.1217032 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1038/ncb3114 · DOI
  28. 10.1074/jbc.M113.456228 · DOI
  29. 10.1038/ncb2708 · DOI
  30. 10.1016/j.cmet.2012.03.002 · DOI
  31. 10.1007/s00018-015-1889-z · DOI
  32. 10.1152/ajpcell.00536.2003 · DOI
  33. 10.1016/j.cmet.2012.07.006 · DOI · Paper page
  34. 10.1074/mcp.R113.029751 · DOI
  35. 10.1016/j.tem.2013.02.002 · DOI
  36. 10.1038/nrd3802 · DOI
  37. 10.1038/ncb2757 · DOI · Paper page
  38. 10.1073/pnas.76.7.3169 · DOI
  39. 10.1073/pnas.100471497 · DOI
  40. 10.1073/pnas.1100844108 · DOI · Paper page
  41. 10.1126/science.1099993 · DOI
  42. 10.1074/jbc.M707328200 · DOI
  43. 1984, Topography and polypeptide distribution of terminal N-acetylglucosamine residues on the surfaces of intact lymphocytes. Evidence for O-linked GlcNAc, J Biol Chem, 259, 3308, 10.1016/S0021-9258(17)43295-9 · DOI
  44. 10.1074/mcp.O112.018366 · DOI
  45. 10.2337/diabetes.49.12.2070 · DOI
  46. 10.1073/pnas.1205748109 · DOI
  47. 10.1074/jbc.M109.077818 · DOI
  48. 10.1016/j.cmet.2005.06.005 · DOI
  49. 10.1093/nar/gku236 · DOI
  50. 2017, Protein O-GlcNAcylation: emerging mechanisms and functions, Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol, 18, 452, 10.1038/nrm.2017.22 · DOI
  51. 10.1038/nature06668 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 151

Metadata

Authors
Ruan, H.-B., Ma, Y., Torres, S., Zhang, B., Feriod, C., Heck, R. M., Qian, K., Fu, M., Li, X., Nathanson, M. H., Bennett, A. M., Nie, Y., Ehrlich, B. E., & Yang, X.
Venue
Genes & Development
Published
2017-08-15
Volume
31
Issue
16
Pages
1655-1665
ISSN
  • 0890-9369
  • 1549-5477
Cited by
151
References
10
Language
en
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (R01DK089098, R01DK102648, CT DPH2014-0139)
  • American Cancer Society
  • Ellison Medical Foundation
  • NIH (P01DK57751, P30DK34989)
  • American Heart Association (14SDG20120052)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review