Cited by 517

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Nutrient starvation elicits an acute autophagic response mediated by Ulk1 dephosphorylation and its subsequent dissociation from AMPK

Shang, Libin, Chen, She, Du, Fenghe, Li, Shen, Zhao, Liping, Wang, Xiaodong·2011·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Macroautophagy (herein referred to as autophagy) is an evolutionarily conserved self-digestive process cells adapt to starvation and other stress responses. Upon starvation, autophagy is induced, providing cells with needed nutrient supplies. We report here that Unc-51-like kinase 1 (Ulk1), a key initiator for mammalian autophagy, undergoes dramatic dephosphorylation upon starvation, particularly at serine 638 and serine 758. Phosphorylations of Ulk1 are mediated by mammalian target-of-rapamycin (mTOR) kinase and adenosine monophosphate activated protein kinase (AMPK). AMPK interacts with Ulk1 in a nutrient-dependent manner. Proper phosphorylations on Ulk1 are crucial for Ulk1/AMPK association, as a single serine-to-alanine mutation (S758A) at Ulk1 impairs this interaction. Compared to the wild-type ULK1, this Ulk1-S758A mutant initiates starvation-induced autophagy faster at an early time point, but does not alter the maximum capacity of autophagy when starvation prolongs. This study therefore revealed previously unnoticed acute autophagy response to environmental changes.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1100844108

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. 10.1038/nrm2708 · DOI
  2. 10.1242/dev.016105 · DOI
  3. 10.1101/gad.1599207 · DOI
  4. 10.1083/jcb.150.6.1507 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1128/MCB.01344-09 · DOI
  6. 10.1128/MCB.01082-08 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1091/mbc.e08-12-1250 · DOI
  8. 10.1074/jbc.M900573200 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.4161/auto.5.7.9296 · DOI
  10. 10.1091/mbc.e08-12-1249 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.4161/auto.5.5.8249 · DOI
  12. 10.1038/nature09204 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1002/jcp.1041190120 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Shang, L., Chen, S., Du, F., Li, S., Zhao, L., & Wang, X.
Affiliations
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute and Department of Biochemistry, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, 5323 Harry Hines Boulevard, Dallas, TX 75390; and
  • National Institute of Biological Sciences, Zhongguancun Life Science Park, Beijing 102206, China
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2011-03-07
Volume
108
Issue
12
Pages
4788-4793
ISSN
  • 0027-8424
  • 1091-6490
Cited by
517
References
6
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review