Cited by 125T-cell and Retrovirus StudiesVirus-based gene therapy researchGenomics and Chromatin Dynamics

Distribution of targets for avian retrovirus DNA integration in vivo

Open access
Withers-Ward, E S, Kitamura, Y, Barnes, J P, Coffin, J M·1994·Genes & Development

Abstract

The targeting of DNA integration in retrovirus-infected cells is a central yet very poorly understood aspect of the biology of the virus. To investigate this problem, we have assessed the use of specific sites for integration targets of avian leukosis virus (ALV) DNA within defined regions of turkey embryo fibroblast (TEF) cellular DNA. For this purpose, we developed an assay of sufficient sensitivity and specificity to allow detection and location of single integration events in a population of 5 million cells. Targets selected for study were either regions cloned by virtue of a previous integration event or clones chosen at random from cellular DNA. By use of this approach, we found that all genomic regions tested contained integration targets, with a frequency that varied from approximately 0.2 to 4 times that expected for random integration. Within regions, the frequency of use of specific sites varied considerably, with some sites used up to 280 times random frequency. When one region was introduced into cells at moderately high copy number by transfection, it provided integration targets in a pattern very much like that seen with the same sequence in vitro. On the basis of our sampling, we conclude that most or all regions of the TEF genome are accessible to ALV retroviral integration. As with integration in vitro, integration specificity seems to be determined largely by local structural features rather than accessibility of specific regions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/gad.8.12.1473

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Depending on the retrovirus type, IN acts on approximately 16-20 terminal nucleotides of the LTR.

    “Depending upon the retrovirus type, IN acts on ~16–20 terminal nucleotides of the LTR (Colicelli and Goff 1988, Withers-Ward et al. 1994, Masuda et al. 1998, Brown et al. 1999).”

    From Beyond reverse transcription: molecular mechanisms and emerging paradigms in retroviral replication (2026) · cites this paper as Withers-Ward et al. 1994

    In the section on integration-site detection (page unavailable), the paper reports that the LTR’s 3′ end loses two bases during integration and joins to target DNA. That supports involvement of the LTR terminus, but our copy does not establish that IN acts on approximately 16–20 terminal nucleotides or that this length varies by retrovirus type (searched for the range, terminal sequences, and integrase activity). (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Lincoln, S.E., M.J. Daly, and E.S. Lander. 1991. Primer: A com- puter program for automatically selecting PCR primers. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
  2. Varmus, H.E. and P. Brown. 1989. Retroviruses. In Mobile DNA (ed. D.E. Berg and M.M. Howe), pp. 53-108. American Soci- ety for Microbiology, Washington, D.C. Varmus, H.E. and R. Swanstrom. 1984. Replication of retrovi- ruses. In RNA tumor viruses, l / T e x t (ed. R. Weiss, N. Teich, H. Varmus, and J. Coffin), pp. 369-512. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, New York.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Withers-Ward, E. S., Kitamura, Y., Barnes, J. P., & Coffin, J. M.
Affiliations
Tufts University (US)
Venue
Genes & Development
Published
1994-06-15
Volume
8
Issue
12
Pages
1473-1487
ISSN
  • 0890-9369 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-5477
OpenAlex
W1996628643
Cited by
125
References
44
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Genes & Development (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • American Cancer Society
  • National Cancer Institute
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › T-cell and Retrovirus Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Virus-based gene therapy research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
Keywords
retroviral integration, avian leukosis virus, DNA accessibility, viral genome structure, site-specific integration
MeSH terms
Animals, Avian Leukosis Virus, Base Sequence, Cells, Cultured, Coturnix, DNA, Viral, Molecular Sequence Data, Repetitive Sequences, Nucleic Acid, Turkeys, Polymerase Chain Reaction, Virus Integration, Genome, Conserved Sequence, Sequence Analysis, DNA, DNA Primers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review