The DOI matches its Crossref record; 81 of the 81 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
On the origin of new genes in Drosophila
Open accessAbstract
Several mechanisms have been proposed to account for the origination of new genes. Despite extensive case studies, the general principles governing this fundamental process are still unclear at the whole-genome level. Here, we unveil genome-wide patterns for the mutational mechanisms leading to new genes and their subsequent lineage-specific evolution at different time nodes in the Drosophila melanogaster species subgroup. We find that (1) tandem gene duplication has generated ∼80% of the nascent duplicates that are limited to single species (D. melanogaster or Drosophila yakuba); (2) the most abundant new genes shared by multiple species (44.1%) are dispersed duplicates, and are more likely to be retained and be functional; (3) de novo gene origination from noncoding sequences plays an unexpectedly important role during the origin of new genes, and is responsible for 11.9% of the new genes; (4) retroposition is also an important mechanism, and had generated ∼10% of the new genes; (5) ∼30% of the new genes in the D. melanogaster species complex recruited various genomic sequences and formed chimeric gene structures, suggesting structure innovation as an important way to help fixation of new genes; and (6) the rate of the origin of new functional genes is estimated to be five to 11 genes per million years in the D. melanogaster subgroup. Finally, we survey gene frequencies among 19 globally derived strains for D. melanogaster-specific new genes and reveal that 44.4% of them show copy number polymorphisms within a population. In conclusion, we provide a panoramic picture for the origin of new genes in Drosophila species.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Basic local alignment search tool
Altschul, S. F., Gish, W., Miller, W., Myers, E. W., & Lipman, D. J. (1990) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1006/jmbi.1990.9999 · Cited by 98,669
Tandem repeats finder: a program to analyze DNA sequences
Benson, G. (1999) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/27.2.573 · Cited by 9,374
<tt>BLAT</tt> —The <tt>BLAST</tt> -Like Alignment Tool
Kent, W. J. (2002) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.229202 · Cited by 8,480
Ohno, S. (1970) · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-86659-3 · Cited by 7,833
The Evolutionary Fate and Consequences of Duplicate Genes
Lynch, M., & Conery, J. S. (2000) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.290.5494.1151 · Cited by 4,988
Prediction of complete gene structures in human genomic DNA
Burge, C., & Karlin, S. (1997) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1006/jmbi.1997.0951 · Cited by 4,228
A Genomic Perspective on Protein Families
Tatusov, R. L., Koonin, E. V., & Lipman, D. J. (1997) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.278.5338.631 · Cited by 3,590
Preservation of Duplicate Genes by Complementary, Degenerative Mutations
Force, A., Lynch, M., Pickett, F. B., Amores, A., Yan, Y.-L., & Postlethwait, J. (1999) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/151.4.1531 · Cited by 3,529
Jacob, F. (1977) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.860134 · Cited by 2,690
Birney, E., Clamp, M., & Durbin, R. (2004) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.1865504 · Cited by 2,542
Cited by
Gene duplication and evolutionary novelty in plants
Flagel, L. E., & Wendel, J. F. (2009) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.02923.x · Cited by 969
The evolutionary origin of orphan genes
Tautz, D., & Domazet-Lošo, T. (2011) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg3053 · Cited by 764
RNA-based gene duplication: Mechanistic and evolutionary insights
Kaessmann, H., Vinckenbosch, N., & Long, M. (2009) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg2487 · Cited by 449
Recent de novo origin of human protein-coding genes
Knowles, D. G., & McLysaght, A. (2009) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.095026.109 · Cited by 291
New Gene Evolution: Little Did We Know
Long, M., VanKuren, N. W., Chen, S., & Vibranovski, M. D. (2013) · Annual Review of Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev-genet-111212-133301 · Cited by 307
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhou, Q., Zhang, G., Zhang, Y., Xu, S., Zhao, R., Zhan, Z., Li, X., Ding, Y., Yang, S., & Wang, W.
- Venue
- Genome Research
- Publisher
- Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
- Published
- 2008-06-11
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1446-1455
- ISSN
- 1088-9051 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2136289616
- Cited by
- 257
- References
- 81
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: On the origin of new genes in Drosophila. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1101/gr.076588.108
- The paper
- Zhou, Q., Zhang, G., Zhang, Y., Xu, S., Zhao, R., Zhan, Z., Li, X., Ding, Y., Yang, S., & Wang, W. (2008). On the origin of new genes in Drosophila. Genome Research. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.076588.108
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.