Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 317

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Comparative genomic analyses of the human fungal pathogens Coccidioides and their relatives

Open access
Sharpton, Thomas J., Stajich, Jason E., Rounsley, Steven D., Gardner, Malcolm J., Wortman, Jennifer R., Jordar, Vinita S., Maiti, Rama, Kodira, Chinnappa D., Neafsey, Daniel E., Zeng, Qiandong, Hung, Chiung-Yu, McMahan, Cody, Muszewska, Anna, Grynberg, Marcin, Mandel, M. Alejandra, Kellner, Ellen M., Barker, Bridget M., Galgiani, John N., Orbach, Marc J., Kirkland, Theo N., Cole, Garry T., Henn, Matthew R., Birren, Bruce W., Taylor, John W.·2009·Genome Research

Abstract

While most Ascomycetes tend to associate principally with plants, the dimorphic fungi Coccidioides immitis and Coccidioides posadasii are primary pathogens of immunocompetent mammals, including humans. Infection results from environmental exposure to Coccidiodies, which is believed to grow as a soil saprophyte in arid deserts. To investigate hypotheses about the life history and evolution of Coccidioides, the genomes of several Onygenales, including C. immitis and C. posadasii; a close, nonpathogenic relative, Uncinocarpus reesii; and a more diverged pathogenic fungus, Histoplasma capsulatum, were sequenced and compared with those of 13 more distantly related Ascomycetes. This analysis identified increases and decreases in gene family size associated with a host/substrate shift from plants to animals in the Onygenales. In addition, comparison among Onygenales genomes revealed evolutionary changes in Coccidioides that may underlie its infectious phenotype, the identification of which may facilitate improved treatment and prevention of coccidioidomycosis. Overall, the results suggest that Coccidioides species are not soil saprophytes, but that they have evolved to remain associated with their dead animal hosts in soil, and that Coccidioides metabolism genes, membrane-related proteins, and putatively antigenic compounds have evolved in response to interaction with an animal host.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/gr.087551.108

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 7 references

Cited by

See all 317

Metadata

Authors
Sharpton, T. J., Stajich, J. E., Rounsley, S. D., Gardner, M. J., Wortman, J. R., Jordar, V. S., Maiti, R., Kodira, C. D., Neafsey, D. E., Zeng, Q., Hung, C.-Y., McMahan, C., Muszewska, A., Grynberg, M., Mandel, M. A., Kellner, E. M., Barker, B. M., Galgiani, J. N., Orbach, M. J., Kirkland, T. N., Cole, G. T., Henn, M. R., Birren, B. W., & Taylor, J. W.
Venue
Genome Research
Published
2009-08-28
Volume
19
Issue
10
Pages
1722-1731
ISSN
1088-9051 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2169900015
Cited by
317
References
7
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparative genomic analyses of the human fungal pathogens Coccidioides and their relatives. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1101/gr.087551.108
The paper
Sharpton, T. J., Stajich, J. E., Rounsley, S. D., Gardner, M. J., Wortman, J. R., Jordar, V. S., Maiti, R., Kodira, C. D., Neafsey, D. E., Zeng, Q., Hung, C.-Y., McMahan, C., Muszewska, A., Grynberg, M., Mandel, M. A., Kellner, E. M., Barker, B. M., Galgiani, J. N., Orbach, M. J., . . . Taylor, J. W. (2009). Comparative genomic analyses of the human fungal pathogens Coccidioides and their relatives. Genome Research. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.087551.108

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.