The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The recombination landscape of the zebra finch Taeniopygia guttata genome
Open accessAbstract
Understanding the causes and consequences of variation in the rate of recombination is essential since this parameter is considered to affect levels of genetic variability, the efficacy of selection, and the design of association and linkage mapping studies. However, there is limited knowledge about the factors governing recombination rate variation. We genotyped 1920 single nucleotide polymorphisms in a multigeneration pedigree of more than 1000 zebra finches ( Taeniopygia guttata ) to develop a genetic linkage map, and then we used these map data together with the recently available draft genome sequence of the zebra finch to estimate recombination rates in 1 Mb intervals across the genome. The average zebra finch recombination rate (1.5 cM/Mb) is higher than in humans, but significantly lower than in chicken. The local rates of recombination in chicken and zebra finch were only weakly correlated, demonstrating evolutionary turnover of the recombination landscape in birds. The distribution of recombination events was heavily biased toward ends of chromosomes, with a stronger telomere effect than so far seen in any organism. In fact, the recombination rate was as low as 0.1 cM/Mb in intervals up to 100 Mb long in the middle of the larger chromosomes. We found a positive correlation between recombination rate and GC content, as well as GC-rich sequence motifs. Levels of linkage disequilibrium (LD) were significantly higher in regions of low recombination, showing that heterogeneity in recombination rates have left a footprint on the genomic landscape of LD in zebra finch populations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The hitch-hiking effect of a favourable gene
Smith, J. M., & Haigh, J. (1974) · Genetical Research · doi:10.1017/s0016672300014634 · Cited by 3,415
International Chicken Genome Sequencing Consortium (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03154 · Cited by 2,750
Linkage disequilibrium--understanding the evolutionary past and mapping the medical future.
Slatkin, M. (2008) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg2361 · Cited by 1,614 · cited 1×
“This suggests that the local rate of recombination might strongly affect levels of LD (Slatkin 2008).”
The evolution of recombination under domestication: A test of two hypotheses
Ross‐Ibarra, J. (2004) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/380606 · Cited by 107 · cited 2×
“However, there are several lines of evidence to suggest that recombination rates increased during domestication, as strong artificial selection in new environments will favor novel haplotypes (Burt and Bell 1987; Ross-Ibarra 2004).”
CHARLESWORTH, B. (2007) · Genetics Research · doi:10.1017/s0016672308009580 · Cited by 19
Cited by
Cruickshank, T. E., & Hahn, M. W. (2014) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/mec.12796 · Cited by 1,061
Variation in recombination frequency and distribution across eukaryotes: patterns and processes
Stapley, J., Feulner, P. G. D., Johnston, S. E., Santure, A. W., & Smadja, C. M. (2017) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2016.0455 · Cited by 507
The Dynamics of Incomplete Lineage Sorting across the Ancient Adaptive Radiation of Neoavian Birds
Suh, A., Smeds, L., & Ellegren, H. (2015) · PLOS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1002224 · Cited by 277
Self-citationNatural selection shaped the rise and fall of passenger pigeon genomic diversity
Murray, G. G. R., Soares, A. E. R., Novak, B. J., Schaefer, N. K., Cahill, J. A., Baker, A. J., Demboski, J. R., Doll, A., Da Fonseca, R. R., Fulton, T. L., et al. (2017) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aao0960 · Cited by 132
Island songbirds as windows into evolution in small populations
Leroy, T., Rousselle, M., Tilak, M.-K., Caizergues, A. E., Scornavacca, C., Recuerda, M., Fuchs, J., Illera, J. C., De Swardt, D. H., Blanco, G., et al. (2021) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2020.12.040 · Cited by 113
Metadata
- Authors
- Backström, N., Forstmeier, W., Schielzeth, H., Mellenius, H., Nam, K., Bolund, E., Webster, M. T., Öst, T., Schneider, M., Kempenaers, B., & Ellegren, H.
- Venue
- Genome Research
- Publisher
- Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
- Published
- 2010-03-31
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 485-495
- ISSN
- 1088-9051 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2117078182
- Cited by
- 236
- References
- 5
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The recombination landscape of the zebra finch Taeniopygia guttata genome. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1101/gr.101410.109
- The paper
- Backström, N., Forstmeier, W., Schielzeth, H., Mellenius, H., Nam, K., Bolund, E., Webster, M. T., Öst, T., Schneider, M., Kempenaers, B., & Ellegren, H. (2010). The recombination landscape of the zebra finch Taeniopygia guttata genome. Genome Research. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.101410.109
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.