The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Analyses of LTR-Retrotransposon Structures Reveal Recent and Rapid Genomic DNA Loss in Rice
Open accessAbstract
We initially analyzed 11 families of low- and middle-copy-number long terminal repeat (LTR) retrotransposons in rice to determine how their structures have diverged from their predicted ancestral forms. These elements, many highly fragmented, were identified on the basis of sequence homology and structural characteristics. The 11 families, totaling 1000 elements, have copy numbers ranging from 1 to 278. Less than one-quarter of these elements are intact, whereas the remaining are solo LTRs and variously truncated fragments. We also analyzed two highly repetitive families (Osr8 and Osr30) of LTR retrotransposons and observed the same results. Our data indicate that unequal homologous recombination and illegitimate recombination are primarily responsible for LTR-retrotransposon removal. Further analysis suggests that most of the detectable LTR retrotransposons in rice inserted less than 8 million years ago, and have now lost over two-thirds of their encoded sequences. Hence, we predict that the half-life of LTR-retrotransposon sequences in rice is less than 6 million years. Moreover, our data demonstrate that at least 22% (97 Mb) of the current rice genome is comprised of LTR-retrotransposon sequences, and that more than 190 Mb of LTR-retrotransposon sequences have been deleted from the rice genome in the last 8 million years.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Kimura, M. (1980) · Journal of Molecular Evolution · doi:10.1007/bf01731581 · Cited by 29,778
Analysis of the genome sequence of the flowering plant Arabidopsis thaliana
Initiative, T. A. G. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35048692 · Cited by 9,301
Kapitonov, V., & Jurkal, J. (1996) · Journal of Molecular Evolution · doi:10.1007/bf00163212 · Cited by 299
Long terminal repeat retrotransposons of Oryza sativa
McCarthy, E. M., Liu, J., Lizhi, G., & McDonald, J. F. (2002) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2002-3-10-research0053 · Cited by 139
Evolutionary History of the Human Endogenous Retrovirus Family ERV9
Costas, J., & Naveira, H. (2000) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026312 · Cited by 49
Cited by
The Brassica oleracea genome reveals the asymmetrical evolution of polyploid genomes
Liu, S., Liu, Y., Yang, X., Tong, C., Edwards, D., Parkin, I. A. P., Zhao, M., Ma, J., Yu, J., Huang, S., et al. (2014) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms4930 · Cited by 1,161
Self-citationA Field Guide to Eukaryotic Transposable Elements
Wells, J. N., & Feschotte, C. (2020) · Annual Review of Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev-genet-040620-022145 · Cited by 686
Transposable Elements, Epigenetics, and Genome Evolution
Fedoroff, N. V. (2012) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.338.6108.758 · Cited by 634
Dynamics of genome size evolution in birds and mammals
Kapusta, A., Suh, A., & Feschotte, C. (2017) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1616702114 · Cited by 466
A mosaic monoploid reference sequence for the highly complex genome of sugarcane
Garsmeur, O., Droc, G., Antonise, R., Grimwood, J., Potier, B., Aitken, K., Jenkins, J., Martin, G., Charron, C., Hervouet, C., et al. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-05051-5 · Cited by 452
Metadata
- Authors
- Ma, J., Devos, K. M., & Bennetzen, J. L.
- Venue
- Genome Research
- Publisher
- Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
- Published
- 2004-04-12
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 860-869
- ISSN
- 1088-9051 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2116659955
- Cited by
- 548
- References
- 5
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Analyses of LTR-Retrotransposon Structures Reveal Recent and Rapid Genomic DNA Loss in Rice. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1101/gr.1466204
- The paper
- Ma, J., Devos, K. M., & Bennetzen, J. L. (2004). Analyses of LTR-Retrotransposon Structures Reveal Recent and Rapid Genomic DNA Loss in Rice. Genome Research. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.1466204
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.