Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 421

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Genetic Analysis of Case/Control Data Using Estimated Haplotype Frequencies: Application to APOE Locus Variation and Alzheimer's Disease

Open access
Fallin, Daniele, Cohen, Annick, Essioux, Laurent, Chumakov, Ilya, Blumenfeld, Marta, Cohen, Daniel, Schork, Nicholas J.·2001·Genome Research

Abstract

There is growing debate over the utility of multiple locus association analyses in the identification of genomic regions harboring sequence variants that influence common complex traits such as hypertension and diabetes. Much of this debate concerns the manner in which one can use the genotypic information from individuals gathered in simple sampling frameworks, such as the case/control designs, to actually assess the association between alleles in a particular genomic region and a trait. In this paper we describe methods for testing associations between estimated haplotype frequencies derived from multilocus genotype data and disease endpoints assuming a simple case/control sampling design. These proposed methods overcome the lack of phase information usually associated with samples of unrelated individuals and provide a comprehensive way of assessing the relationship between sequence or multiple-site variation and traits and diseases within populations. We applied the proposed methods in a study of the relationship between polymorphisms within the APOE gene region and Alzheimer's disease. Cases and controls for this study were collected from the United States and France. Our results confirm the known association between the APOE locus and Alzheimer's disease, even when the ɛ4 polymorphism is not contained in the tested haplotypes. This suggests that, in certain situations, haplotype information and linkage disequilibrium-induced associations between polymorphic loci that neighbor loci harboring functional sequence variants can be exploited to identify disease-predisposing alleles in large, freely mixing populations via estimated haplotype frequency methods.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/gr.148401

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 421

Metadata

Authors
Fallin, D., Cohen, A., Essioux, L., Chumakov, I., Blumenfeld, M., Cohen, D., & Schork, N. J.
Venue
Genome Research
Published
2001-01-01
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
143-151
ISSN
  • 1088-9051 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-5469
OpenAlex
W2157080296
Cited by
421
References
9
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.