The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Genomic Dissection of Genotype × Environment Interactions Conferring Adaptation of Cotton to Arid Conditions
Open accessAbstract
The interaction of genotype with environment is of primary importance in many aspects of genomic research and is a special priority in the study of major crops grown in a wide range of environments. Water deficit, the major factor limiting plant growth and crop productivity worldwide, is expected to increase with the spread of arid lands. In genetically equivalent cotton populations grown under well-watered and water-limited conditions (the latter is responsible for yield reduction of ∼50% relative to well-watered conditions), productivity and quality were shown to be partly accounted for by different quantitative trait loci (QTLs), indicating that adaptation to both arid and favorable conditions can be combined in the same genotype. QTL mapping was also used to test the association between productivity and quality under water deficit with a suite of traits often found to differ between genotypes adapted to arid versus well-watered conditions. In this study, only reduced plant osmotic potential was clearly implicated in improved cotton productivity under arid conditions. Genomic tools and approaches may expedite breeding of genotypes that respond favorably to specific environments, help test roles of additional physiological factors, and guide the isolation of genes that protect crop performance under arid conditions toward improved adaptation of crops to arid cultivation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Plant productivity and environment
Boyer, J. S. (1982) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.218.4571.443 · Cited by 3,959
Plant Breeding for Stress Environments
Blum, A. (2018) · doi:10.1201/9781351075718 · Cited by 1,309 · cited 1×
“…technologies help to reduce the gap between potential and actual yield; however, because of diminishing fresh water supplies in many regions, genetic improvement of crop productivity under arid conditions (Blum 1988) is necessary as a sustainable and economically viable solution to this problem.”
Background
Cited by
Crop production under drought and heat stress: plant responses and management options.
Fahad, S., Bajwa, A. A., Nazir, U., Anjum, S. A., Farooq, A., Zohaib, A., Sadia, S., Nasim, W., Adkins, S., Saud, S., et al. (2017) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2017.01147 · Cited by 2,629
Integrated genomics, physiology and breeding approaches for improving drought tolerance in crops
Mir, R. R., Zaman-Allah, M., Sreenivasulu, N., Trethowan, R., & Varshney, R. K. (2012) · Theoretical and Applied Genetics · doi:10.1007/s00122-012-1904-9 · Cited by 477
Nezhadahmadi, A., Prodhan, Z. H., & Faruq, G. (2013) · The Scientific World Journal · doi:10.1155/2013/610721 · Cited by 444
Drought coping strategies in cotton: increased crop per drop
Ullah, A., Sun, H., Yang, X., & Zhang, X. (2017) · Plant Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1111/pbi.12688 · Cited by 384
Metadata
- Authors
- Saranga, Y., Menz, M., Jiang, C.-X., Wright, R. J., Yakir, D., & Paterson, A. H.
- Venue
- Genome Research
- Publisher
- Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
- Published
- 2001-12-01
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1988-1995
- ISSN
- 1088-9051 (ISSN-L)
- 1549-5469
- OpenAlex
- W2153475283
- Cited by
- 194
- References
- 2
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Genomic Dissection of Genotype × Environment Interactions Conferring Adaptation of Cotton to Arid Conditions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1101/gr.157201
- The paper
- Saranga, Y., Menz, M., Jiang, C.-X., Wright, R. J., Yakir, D., & Paterson, A. H. (2001). Genomic Dissection of Genotype × Environment Interactions Conferring Adaptation of Cotton to Arid Conditions. Genome Research. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.157201
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.