Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 438

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 83 of the 83 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Fast and flexible bacterial genomic epidemiology with PopPUNK

Open access
Lees, John A., Harris, Simon R., Tonkin-Hill, Gerry, Gladstone, Rebecca A., Lo, Stephanie W., Weiser, Jeffrey N., Corander, Jukka, Bentley, Stephen D., Croucher, Nicholas J.·2019·Genome Research

Abstract

The routine use of genomics for disease surveillance provides the opportunity for high-resolution bacterial epidemiology. Current whole-genome clustering and multilocus typing approaches do not fully exploit core and accessory genomic variation, and they cannot both automatically identify, and subsequently expand, clusters of significantly similar isolates in large data sets spanning entire species. Here, we describe PopPUNK ( Pop ulation P artitioning U sing N ucleotide K -mers), a software implementing scalable and expandable annotation- and alignment-free methods for population analysis and clustering. Variable-length k -mer comparisons are used to distinguish isolates’ divergence in shared sequence and gene content, which we demonstrate to be accurate over multiple orders of magnitude using data from both simulations and genomic collections representing 10 taxonomically widespread species. Connections between closely related isolates of the same strain are robustly identified, despite interspecies variation in the pairwise distance distributions that reflects species’ diverse evolutionary patterns. PopPUNK can process 10 3 –10 4 genomes in a single batch, with minimal memory use and runtimes up to 200-fold faster than existing model-based methods. Clusters of strains remain consistent as new batches of genomes are added, which is achieved without needing to reanalyze all genomes de novo. This facilitates real-time surveillance with consistent cluster naming between studies and allows for outbreak detection using hundreds of genomes in minutes. Interactive visualization and online publication is streamlined through the automatic output of results to multiple platforms. PopPUNK has been designed as a flexible platform that addresses important issues with currently used whole-genome clustering and typing methods, and has potential uses across bacterial genetics and public health research.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/gr.241455.118

Cites

83 of 83 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 83 references

Cited by

See all 438

Metadata

Authors
Lees, J. A., Harris, S. R., Tonkin-Hill, G., Gladstone, R. A., Lo, S. W., Weiser, J. N., Corander, J., Bentley, S. D., & Croucher, N. J.
Venue
Genome Research
Published
2019-01-24
Volume
29
Issue
2
Pages
304-316
ISSN
  • 1088-9051 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-5469
OpenAlex
W2949236085
Cited by
438
References
83
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fast and flexible bacterial genomic epidemiology with PopPUNK. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1101/gr.241455.118
The paper
Lees, J. A., Harris, S. R., Tonkin-Hill, G., Gladstone, R. A., Lo, S. W., Weiser, J. N., Corander, J., Bentley, S. D., & Croucher, N. J. (2019). Fast and flexible bacterial genomic epidemiology with PopPUNK. Genome Research. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.241455.118

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.