The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An Efficient SNP System for Mouse Genome Scanning and Elucidating Strain Relationships
Open accessAbstract
A set of 1638 informative SNP markers easily assayed by the Amplifluor genotyping system were tested in 102 mouse strains, including the majority of the common and wild-derived inbred strains available from The Jackson Laboratory. Selected from publicly available databases, the markers are on average ∼1.5 Mb apart and, whenever possible, represent the rare allele in at least two strains. Amplifluor assays were developed for each marker and performed on two independent DNA samples from each strain. The mean number of polymorphisms between strains was 608±136 SD. Several tests indicate that the markers provide an effective system for performing genome scans and quantitative trait loci analyses in all but the most closely related strains. Additionally, the markers revealed several subtle differences between closely related mouse strains, including the groups of several 129, BALB, C3H, C57, and DBA strains, and a group of wild-derived inbred strains representing several Mus musculus subspecies. Applying a neighbor-joining method to the data, we constructed a mouse strain family tree, which in most cases confirmed existing genealogies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees.
(1987) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040454 · Cited by 59,715
Construction of a genetic linkage map in man using restriction fragment length polymorphisms.
Botstein, D., White, R. L., Skolnick, M. H., & Davis, R. W. (1980) · Europe PMC (PubMed Central) · Cited by 8,327
Initial sequencing and comparative analysis of the mouse genome
Mouse Genome Sequencing Consortium (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01262 · Cited by 7,187
Drake, J. W., Charlesworth, B., Charlesworth, D., & Crow, J. F. (1998) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/148.4.1667 · Cited by 1,932
Optimizing parental selection for genetic linkage maps
Anderson, J. A., Churchill, G. A., Autrique, J. E., Tanksley, S. D., & Sorrells, M. E. (1993) · Genome · doi:10.1139/g93-024 · Cited by 1,540
A comprehensive genetic map of the mouse genome
Dietrich, W. F., Miller, J., Steen, R., Merchant, M. A., Damron-Boles, D., Husain, Z., Dredge, R., Daly, M. J., Ingalls, K. A., O'Connor, T. J., et al. (1996) · Nature · doi:10.1038/380149a0 · Cited by 827
Genealogies of mouse inbred strains
Beck, J. A., Lloyd, S., Hafezparast, M., Lennon-Pierce, M., Eppig, J. T., Festing, M. F. W., & Fisher, E. M. C. (2000) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/71641 · Cited by 823
Genetic variation among 129 substrains and its importance for targeted mutagenesis in mice
Simpson, E. M., Linder, C. C., Sargent, E. E., Davisson, M. T., Mobraaten, L. E., & Sharp, J. J. (1997) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng0597-19 · Cited by 686
Self-citationThe mosaic structure of variation in the laboratory mouse genome
Wade, C. M., Kulbokas, E. J., Kirby, A. W., Zody, M. C., Mullikin, J. C., Lander, E. S., Lindblad-Toh, K., & Daly, M. J. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01252 · Cited by 461
High-Throughput SNP Genotyping by Allele-Specific PCR with Universal Energy-Transfer-Labeled Primers
Myakishev, M. V., Khripin, Y., Hu, S., & Hamer, D. H. (2001) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.157901 · Cited by 325
Cited by
Innate immunity and intestinal microbiota in the development of Type 1 diabetes
Wen, L., Ley, R. E., Volchkov, P. Y., Stranges, P. B., Avanesyan, L., Stonebraker, A. C., Hu, C., Wong, F. S., Szot, G. L., Bluestone, J. A., et al. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature07336 · Cited by 1,921
Autism‐like behavioral phenotypes in BTBR T+tf/J mice
McFarlane, H. G., Kusek, G. K., Yang, M., Phoenix, J. L., Bolivar, V. J., & Crawley, J. N. (2008) · Genes, Brain and Behavior · doi:10.1111/j.1601-183x.2007.00330.x · Cited by 812
Unusual repertoire of vocalizations in the BTBR T+tf/J mouse model of autism
Scattoni, M. L., Gandhy, S. U., Ricceri, L., & Crawley, J. N. (2008) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0003067 · Cited by 550
Yuan, R., Tsaih, S., Petkova, S. B., De Evsikova, C. M., Xing, S., Marion, M. A., Bogue, M. A., Mills, K. D., Peters, L. L., Bult, C. J., et al. (2009) · Aging Cell · doi:10.1111/j.1474-9726.2009.00478.x · Cited by 411
The origins and uses of mouse outbred stocks
Chia, R., Achilli, F., Festing, M. F. W., & Fisher, E. M. C. (2005) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng1665 · Cited by 374
Metadata
- Authors
- Petkov, P. M., Ding, Y., Cassell, M. A., Zhang, W., Wagner, G., Sargent, E. E., Asquith, S., Crew, V., Johnson, K. A., Robinson, P., Scott, V. E., & Wiles, M. V.
- Venue
- Genome Research
- Publisher
- Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
- Published
- 2004-09
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1806-1811
- ISSN
- 1088-9051 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2134705056
- Cited by
- 340
- References
- 25
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An Efficient SNP System for Mouse Genome Scanning and Elucidating Strain Relationships. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1101/gr.2825804
- The paper
- Petkov, P. M., Ding, Y., Cassell, M. A., Zhang, W., Wagner, G., Sargent, E. E., Asquith, S., Crew, V., Johnson, K. A., Robinson, P., Scott, V. E., & Wiles, M. V. (2004). An Efficient SNP System for Mouse Genome Scanning and Elucidating Strain Relationships. Genome Research. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.2825804
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
