The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Large-scale structure of genomic methylation patterns
Open accessAbstract
The mammalian genome depends on patterns of methylated cytosines for normal function, but the relationship between genomic methylation patterns and the underlying sequence is unclear. We have characterized the methylation landscape of the human genome by global analysis of patterns of CpG depletion and by direct sequencing of 3073 unmethylated domains and 2565 methylated domains from human brain DNA. The genome was found to consist of short (<4 kb) unmethylated domains embedded in a matrix of long methylated domains. Unmethylated domains were enriched in promoters, CpG islands, and first exons, while methylated domains comprised interspersed and tandem-repeated sequences, exons other than first exons, and non-annotated single-copy sequences that are depleted in the CpG dinucleotide. The enrichment of regulatory sequences in the relatively small unmethylated compartment suggests that cytosine methylation constrains the effective size of the genome through the selective exposure of regulatory sequences. This buffers regulatory networks against changes in total genome size and provides an explanation for the C value paradox, which concerns the wide variations in genome size that scale independently of gene number. This suggestion is compatible with the finding that cytosine methylation is universal among large-genome eukaryotes, while many eukaryotes with genome sizes <5 × 10 8 bp do not methylate their DNA.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
<tt>BLAT</tt> —The <tt>BLAST</tt> -Like Alignment Tool
Kent, W. J. (2002) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.229202 · Cited by 8,480
Targeted mutation of the DNA methyltransferase gene results in embryonic lethality
Li, E., Bestor, T. H., & Jaenisch, R. (1992) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(92)90611-f · Cited by 3,984
Self-citationInduction of tumors in mice by genomic hypomethylation
Gaudet, F., Hodgson, J. G., Eden, A., Jackson-Grusby, L., Dausman, J., Gray, J. W., Leonhardt, H., & Jaenisch, R. (2003) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1083558 · Cited by 1,499 · cited 2×
“2002), while partial demethylation of the genome in mice that carry hypomorphic alleles of Dnmt1 leads to high rates of lymphoma (Gaudet et al. 2002).”
BackgroundSchübeler, D., Lorincz, M. C., Cimbora, D. M., Telling, A., Feng, Y.-Q., Bouhassira, E. E., & Groudine, M. (2000) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.20.24.9103-9112.2000 · Cited by 165
Cited by
DNA methylation landscapes: Provocative insights from epigenomics
Suzuki, M. M., & Bird, A. (2008) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg2341 · Cited by 3,039
Bernstein, B. E., Meissner, A., & Lander, E. S. (2007) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2007.01.033 · Cited by 2,086
Restricting retrotransposons: a review
Goodier, J. L. (2016) · Mobile DNA · doi:10.1186/s13100-016-0070-z · Cited by 436
Sperm Methylation Profiles Reveal Features of Epigenetic Inheritance and Evolution in Primates
Molaro, A., Hodges, E., Fang, F., Song, Q., McCombie, W. R., Hannon, G. J., & Smith, A. D. (2011) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2011.08.016 · Cited by 420
Epigenetic reprogramming in mouse pre-implantation development and primordial germ cells
Saitou, M., Kagiwada, S., & Kurimoto, K. (2012) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.050849 · Cited by 414
Metadata
- Authors
- Rollins, R. A., Haghighi, F., Edwards, J. R., Das, R., Zhang, M. Q., Ju, J., & Bestor, T. H.
- Venue
- Genome Research
- Publisher
- Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
- Published
- 2005-12-19
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 157-163
- ISSN
- 1088-9051 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2111584908
- Cited by
- 389
- References
- 4
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Large-scale structure of genomic methylation patterns. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1101/gr.4362006
- The paper
- Rollins, R. A., Haghighi, F., Edwards, J. R., Das, R., Zhang, M. Q., Ju, J., & Bestor, T. H. (2006). Large-scale structure of genomic methylation patterns. Genome Research. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.4362006
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.