Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 279

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Differential subsequence conservation of interspersed repetitive Streptococcus pneumoniae BOX elements in diverse bacteria.

Open access
Koeuth, T, Versalovic, J, Lupski, J R·1995·Genome Research

Abstract

Evolutionary conservation of an interspersed repetitive DNA sequence, BOX, from Streptococcus pneumoniae was investigated to explore the mosaic nature of these elements. BOX elements consist of various combinations of three subunits, boxA, boxB, and boxC. Eight oligonucleotide probes were designed based on consensus DNA sequences of boxA, boxB, and boxC subunits. DNA hybridization studies and PCR using these probes/primers demonstrate that oligonucleotide sequences within the boxA subunit appear to be conserved among diverse bacterial species. The boxB and boxC subunits show only limited, if any, sequence conservation in bacteria other than S. pneumoniae. Intact BOX elements with boxA, boxB, and boxC subunits were only present in high copy number in pneumococcal strains. This pattern of differential conservation lends support to the modular nature of BOX repetitive elements in that boxA-like subsequences are effectively independent of boxB-like or boxC-like subunits in bacteria other than S. pneumoniae. Furthermore, dendrograms derived from repetitive sequence-based PCR (rep-PCR) fingerprints of S. pneumoniae isolates using the BOXA1R primer yielded clustering patterns that were similar to those obtained previously by other methods, suggesting that these repetitive sequence-based DNA fingerprints represent intrinsic properties of an S. pneumoniae strain's genome. Our results indicate widespread conservation of boxA-like subsequences in the bacterial kingdom, lend support to the mosaic nature of BOX in S. pneumoniae, and demonstrate the utility of boxA-based primers for rep-PCR fingerprinting of many microorganisms.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/gr.5.4.408

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 23 references

Cited by

See all 279

Metadata

Authors
Koeuth, T., Versalovic, J., & Lupski, J. R.
Venue
Genome Research
Published
1995-11
Volume
5
Issue
4
Pages
408-418
ISSN
1088-9051 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1999711296
Cited by
279
References
23
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Differential subsequence conservation of interspersed repetitive Streptococcus pneumoniae BOX elements in diverse bacteria. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1101/gr.5.4.408
The paper
Koeuth, T., Versalovic, J., & Lupski, J. R. (1995). Differential subsequence conservation of interspersed repetitive Streptococcus pneumoniae BOX elements in diverse bacteria. Genome Research. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.5.4.408

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.