The DOI matches its Crossref record; 148 of the 148 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Bacterial strain typing in the genomic era
Open accessAbstract
Bacterial strain typing, or identifying bacteria at the strain level, is particularly important for diagnosis, treatment, and epidemiological surveillance of bacterial infections. This is especially the case for bacteria exhibiting high levels of antibiotic resistance or virulence, and those involved in nosocomial or pandemic infections. Strain typing also has applications in studying bacterial population dynamics. Over the last two decades, molecular methods have progressively replaced phenotypic assays to type bacterial strains. In this article, we review the current bacterial genotyping methods and classify them into three main categories: (1) DNA banding pattern-based methods, which classify bacteria according to the size of fragments generated by amplification and/or enzymatic digestion of genomic DNA, (2) DNA sequencing-based methods, which study the polymorphism of DNA sequences, and (3) DNA hybridization-based methods using nucleotidic probes. We described and compared the applications of genotyping methods to the study of bacterial strain diversity. We also discussed the selection of appropriate genotyping methods and the challenges of bacterial strain typing, described the current trends of genotyping methods, and investigated the progresses allowed by the availability of genomic sequences.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
DNA sequencing with chain-terminating inhibitors
Sanger, F., Nicklen, S., & Coulson, A. R. (1977) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.74.12.5463 · Cited by 68,572
Detection of specific sequences among DNA fragments separated by gel electrophoresis
Southern, E. M. (1975) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/s0022-2836(75)80083-0 · Cited by 32,249
DNA polymorphisms amplified by arbitrary primers are useful as genetic markers
Williams, J. G. K., Kubelik, A. R., Livak, K. J., Rafalski, J. A., & Tingey, S. V. (1990) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/18.22.6531 · Cited by 13,067
AFLP: a new technique for DNA fingerprinting
Vos, P., Hogers, R., Bleeker, M., Reijans, M., Lee, T. V. D., Hornes, M., Friters, A., Pot, J., Paleman, J., Kuiper, M., et al. (1995) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/23.21.4407 · Cited by 12,401
Muyzer, G., de Waal, E. C., & Uitterlinden, A. G. (1993) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.59.3.695-700.1993 · Cited by 11,429
Quantitative Monitoring of Gene Expression Patterns with a Complementary DNA Microarray
Schena, M., Shalon, D., Davis, R. W., & Brown, P. O. (1995) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.270.5235.467 · Cited by 9,609
Tandem repeats finder: a program to analyze DNA sequences
Benson, G. (1999) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/27.2.573 · Cited by 9,374
Tenover, F. C., Arbeit, R. D., Goering, R. V., Mickelsen, P. A., Murray, B. E., Persing, D. H., & Swaminathan, B. (1995) · Journal of Clinical Microbiology · doi:10.1128/jcm.33.9.2233-2239.1995 · Cited by 8,204
Diversity of the Human Intestinal Microbial Flora
Eckburg, P. B., Bik, E. M., Bernstein, C. N., Purdom, E., Dethlefsen, L., Sargent, M., Gill, S. R., Nelson, K. E., & Relman, D. A. (2005) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1110591 · Cited by 7,913
Genome sequencing in microfabricated high-density picolitre reactors
Margulies, M., Egholm, M., Altman, W. E., Attiya, S., Bader, J. S., Bemben, L. A., Berka, J., Braverman, M. S., Chen, Y.-J., Chen, Z., et al. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03959 · Cited by 7,693
Cited by
Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus: Molecular Characterization, Evolution, and Epidemiology
Lakhundi, S., & Zhang, K. (2018) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.00020-18 · Cited by 1,637
Systematic genome assessment of B-vitamin biosynthesis suggests co-operation among gut microbes
Magnúsdóttir, S., Ravcheev, D., de Crécy-Lagard, V., & Thiele, I. (2015) · Frontiers in Genetics · doi:10.3389/fgene.2015.00148 · Cited by 876
Byrnes, E. J., Li, W., Lewit, Y., Ma, H., Voelz, K., Ren, P., Carter, D. A., Chaturvedi, V., Bildfell, R. J., May, R. C., et al. (2010) · PLoS Pathogens · doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1000850 · Cited by 330
Self-citationKomiya, Y., Shimomura, Y., Higurashi, T., Sugi, Y., Arimoto, J., Umezawa, S., Uchiyama, S., Matsumoto, M., & Nakajima, A. (2019) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2018-316661 · Cited by 316
Singh, R. P., Jha, P., & Jha, P. N. (2015) · Journal of Plant Physiology · doi:10.1016/j.jplph.2015.07.002 · Cited by 252
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, W., Raoult, D., & Fournier, P.-E.
- Venue
- FEMS Microbiology Reviews
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2009-09
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 892-916
- ISSN
- 0168-6445 (ISSN-L)
- 1574-6976
- OpenAlex
- W2013547178
- Cited by
- 340
- References
- 148
- FWCI
- 9.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bacterial strain typing in the genomic era. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1574-6976.2009.00182.x
- The paper
- Li, W., Raoult, D., & Fournier, P.-E. (2009). Bacterial strain typing in the genomic era. FEMS Microbiology Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6976.2009.00182.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
