Cited by 87Genomics and Phylogenetic StudiesRNA Research and SplicingChromosomal and Genetic Variations

Computational discovery of internal micro-exons

Open access
Volfovsky, Natalia, Haas, Brian J., Salzberg, Steven L.·2003·Genome Research

Abstract

Very short exons, also known as micro-exons, occur in large numbers in some eukaryotic genomes. Existing annotation tools have a limited ability to recognize these short sequences, which range in length up to 25 bp. Here, we describe a computational method for the identification of micro-exons using near-perfect alignments between cDNA and genomic DNA sequences. Using this method, we detected 319 micro-exons in 4 complete genomes, of which 224 were previously unknown, human (170), the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans (4), the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster (14), and the mustard plant Arabidopsis thaliana (36). Comparison of our computational method with popular cDNA alignment programs shows that the new algorithm is both efficient and accurate. The algorithm also aids in the discovery of micro-exon-skipping events and cross-species micro-exon conservation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/gr.677503

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Microexons, defined as 3-27 nucleotide exons, have been largely missed by genome annotations and transcriptome profiling studies, especially those shorter than 15 nucleotides.

    “In particular, microexons (Beachy et al., 1985; Coleman et al., 1987), defined here as 3-27 nucleotide (nt)-long exons, have been largely missed by genome annotations and transcriptome profiling studies (Volfovsky et al., 2003; Wu et al., 2013; Wu and Watanabe, 2005). This is especially true for microexons shorter than 15 nts.”

    From A Highly Conserved Program of Neuronal Microexons Is Misregulated in Autistic Brains (2014) · cites this paper as Volfovsky et al., 2003

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Volfovsky, N., Haas, B. J., & Salzberg, S. L.
Venue
Genome Research
Published
2003-06
Volume
13
Issue
6a
Pages
1216-1221
ISSN
1088-9051 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2161136120
Cited by
87
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Genome Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (9980088)
  • National Institutes of Health
  • U.S. National Library of Medicine (R01LM006845, R01-LM 06845)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Research and Splicing
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
Keywords
exon identification, genome annotation, alternative splicing, cross-species conservation, human genome, Caenorhabditis elegans, Drosophila melanogaster, Arabidopsis thaliana
MeSH terms
Animals, Base Sequence, DNA, Drosophila melanogaster, Exons, Humans, Molecular Sequence Data, Sequence Alignment, Caenorhabditis elegans, Arabidopsis, Alternative Splicing, DNA, Complementary, DNA, Helminth, DNA, Plant, Computational Biology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review