Cited by 123Genomics and Phylogenetic StudiesRNA Research and SplicingSingle-cell and spatial transcriptomics

OLego: fast and sensitive mapping of spliced mRNA-Seq reads using small seeds

Open access
Wu, Jie, Anczuków, Olga, Krainer, Adrian R., Zhang, Michael Q., Zhang, Chaolin·2013·Nucleic Acids Research

Abstract

A crucial step in analyzing mRNA-Seq data is to accurately and efficiently map hundreds of millions of reads to the reference genome and exon junctions. Here we present OLego, an algorithm specifically designed for de novo mapping of spliced mRNA-Seq reads. OLego adopts a multiple-seed-and-extend scheme, and does not rely on a separate external aligner. It achieves high sensitivity of junction detection by strategic searches with small seeds (~14 nt for mammalian genomes). To improve accuracy and resolve ambiguous mapping at junctions, OLego uses a built-in statistical model to score exon junctions by splice-site strength and intron size. Burrows-Wheeler transform is used in multiple steps of the algorithm to efficiently map seeds, locate junctions and identify small exons. OLego is implemented in C++ with fully multithreaded execution, and allows fast processing of large-scale data. We systematically evaluated the performance of OLego in comparison with published tools using both simulated and real data. OLego demonstrated better sensitivity, higher or comparable accuracy and substantially improved speed. OLego also identified hundreds of novel micro-exons (<30 nt) in the mouse transcriptome, many of which are phylogenetically conserved and can be validated experimentally in vivo. OLego is freely available at http://zhanglab.c2b2.columbia.edu/index.php/OLego.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/nar/gkt216

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Confounders do not account for the differential splicing signal; it was reproduced with an alternative pipeline and validated with RT-PCR.

    “We confirmed that confounders do not account for the differential splicing signal, reproduced the global differential splicing signal with an alternative pipeline15, and performed technical validation with RT–PCR (Extended Data Figs 4d–g, 5a), confirming the differential splicing analysis.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [39]Wang ET Sandberg R Luo S Khrebtukova I Zhang L Mayr C Kingsmore SF Schroth GP Burge CB Alternative isoform regulation in human tissue transcriptomes Nature 2008 456 470 476 18978772 PMC2593745
  2. [41]Trapnell C Pachter L Salzberg SL TopHat: discovering splice junctions with RNA-Seq Bioinformatics 2009 25 1105 1111 19289445 PMC2672628

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wu, J., Anczuków, O., Krainer, A. R., Zhang, M. Q., & Zhang, C.
Affiliations
  • Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory (US)
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
Corresponding author
  • Zhang, Michael Q.
  • Zhang, Chaolin
Venue
Nucleic Acids Research
Published
2013-04-08
Volume
41
Issue
10
Pages
5149-5163
ISSN
  • 0305-1048 (ISSN-L)
  • 1362-4962
OpenAlex
W2112813983
Cited by
123
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 2
FWCI
5.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nucleic Acids Research (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Institutional Repository (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Key Research and Development Program of China (2012CB316503)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM74688, K99GM095713, R01GM074688, R00GM095713)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Research and Splicing
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
Keywords
mRNA-seq, small seeds, Burrows-Wheeler transform, splice site strength, intron size, novel exons, mouse transcriptome
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Animals, Chromosome Mapping, Exons, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Retina, RNA Splicing, RNA, Messenger, Software, Sequence Alignment, Genome, Sequence Analysis, RNA, Gene Expression Profiling, RNA Splice Sites, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review