Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 314

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Long Human–Mouse Sequence Alignments Reveal Novel Regulatory Elements: A Reason to Sequence the Mouse Genome

Open access
Hardison, Ross C., Oeltjen, John, Miller, Webb·1997·Genome Research

Abstract

The utility of sequencing entire genomes of bacteria and fungi is amply demonstrated.For instance, as the complete set of genes for each species is catalogued, one can ascertain the full complement of encoded proteins, obtain insights into the function of new proteins by sequence matches to known proteins, and measure the transcriptional levels of all genes in a genome under various environmental conditions or at different stages of the cell cycle (Boguski et al. 1996;Velculescu et al. 1997).The currently sequenced genomes consist primarily of coding regions with little sequence between the genes, and the amount of genetic information in each segment is usually quite high.Larger genomes from more complex organisms have a considerable amount of DNA between the genes and in introns that interrupt the coding regions, and one could question whether it is useful to determine the sequences of all of these noncoding regions.Indeed, the concerted efforts to determine partial sequences of normalized cDNA libraries have generated rich and very useful databases, such as the TIGR database (TDB) and dbEST (Adams et al. 1991;Boguski 1995).Efforts from Schuler and his colleagues to unite the several sequences from each set of cDNA clones representing a unique gene, the UniGene project, will organize this large amount of sequence data.As of late 1996, the UniGene database contained samples of sequences of almost 50,000 genes, which could represent a majority of human genes (Schuler et al. 1996).Of these UniGene clusters, 16,000 have been placed on the human genome map, which will greatly aid in positional cloning of interesting genes.Although TDB, dbEST, and UniGene are extremely useful, they do have limitations.For in-

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/gr.7.10.959

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 36 references

Cited by

See all 314

Metadata

Authors
Hardison, R. C., Oeltjen, J., & Miller, W.
Venue
Genome Research
Published
1997-10-01
Volume
7
Issue
10
Pages
959-966
ISSN
  • 1088-9051 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-5469
OpenAlex
W1821582542
Cited by
314
References
36
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Long Human–Mouse Sequence Alignments Reveal Novel Regulatory Elements: A Reason to Sequence the Mouse Genome. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1101/gr.7.10.959
The paper
Hardison, R. C., Oeltjen, J., & Miller, W. (1997). Long Human–Mouse Sequence Alignments Reveal Novel Regulatory Elements: A Reason to Sequence the Mouse Genome. Genome Research. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.7.10.959

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.