The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The genome-wide determinants of human and chimpanzee microsatellite evolution
Open accessAbstract
Mutation rates of microsatellites vary greatly among loci. The causes of this heterogeneity remain largely enigmatic yet are crucial for understanding numerous human neurological diseases and genetic instability in cancer. In this first genome-wide study, the relative contributions of intrinsic features and regional genomic factors to the variation in mutability among orthologous human–chimpanzee microsatellites are investigated with resampling and regression techniques. As a result, we uncover the intricacies of microsatellite mutagenesis as follows. First, intrinsic features (repeat number, length, and motif size), which all influence the probability and rate of slippage, are the strongest predictors of mutability. Second, mutability increases nonuniformly with length, suggesting that processes additional to slippage, such as faulty repair, contribute to mutations. Third, mutability varies among microsatellites with different motif composition likely due to dissimilarities in secondary DNA structure formed by their slippage intermediates. Fourth, mutability of mononucleotide microsatellites is impacted by their location on sex chromosomes vs. autosomes and inside vs. outside of Alu repeats, the former confirming the importance of replication and the latter suggesting a role for gene conversion. Fifth, transcription status and location in a particular isochore do not influence microsatellite mutability. Sixth, compared with intrinsic features, regional genomic factors have only minor effects. Finally, our regression models explain ∼90% of variation in microsatellite mutability and can generate useful predictions for the studies of human diseases, forensics, and conservation genetics.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Tandem repeats finder: a program to analyze DNA sequences
Benson, G. (1999) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/27.2.573 · Cited by 9,374
Repeat instability: mechanisms of dynamic mutations
Pearson, C. E., Edamura, K. N., & Cleary, J. D. (2005) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg1689 · Cited by 924
Cited by
Current trends in microsatellite genotyping
GUICHOUX, E., LAGACHE, L., WAGNER, S., CHAUMEIL, P., LÉGER, P., LEPAIS, O., LEPOITTEVIN, C., MALAUSA, T., REVARDEL, E., SALIN, F., et al. (2011) · Molecular Ecology Resources · doi:10.1111/j.1755-0998.2011.03014.x · Cited by 937
Ballantyne, K. N., Goedbloed, M., Fang, R., Schaap, O., Lao, O., Wollstein, A., Choi, Y., van Duijn, K., Vermeulen, M., Brauer, S., et al. (2010) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2010.08.006 · Cited by 401
Fast, Cost-Effective Development of Species-Specific Microsatellite Markers by Genomic Sequencing
Abdelkrim, J., Robertson, B. C., Stanton, J.-A. L., & Gemmell, N. J. (2009) · BioTechniques · doi:10.2144/000113084 · Cited by 375
The landscape of human STR variation
Willems, T., Gymrek, M., Highnam, G., The 1000 Genomes Project Consortium, Mittelman, D., & Erlich, Y. (2014) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.177774.114 · Cited by 283
The effects of chromatin organization on variation in mutation rates in the genome
Makova, K. D., & Hardison, R. C. (2015) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg3890 · Cited by 253
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Kelkar, Y. D., Tyekucheva, S., Chiaromonte, F., & Makova, K. D.
- Venue
- Genome Research
- Publisher
- Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
- Published
- 2007-11-21
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 30-38
- ISSN
- 1088-9051 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2170600903
- Cited by
- 268
- References
- 2
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The genome-wide determinants of human and chimpanzee microsatellite evolution. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1101/gr.7113408
- The paper
- Kelkar, Y. D., Tyekucheva, S., Chiaromonte, F., & Makova, K. D. (2008). The genome-wide determinants of human and chimpanzee microsatellite evolution. Genome Research. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.7113408
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.