The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An attractor network in the hippocampus: Theory and neurophysiology
Open accessAbstract
A quantitative computational theory of the operation of the CA3 system as an attractor or autoassociation network is described. Based on the proposal that CA3-CA3 autoassociative networks are important for episodic or event memory in which space is a component (place in rodents and spatial view in primates), it has been shown behaviorally that the CA3 supports spatial rapid one-trial learning and learning of arbitrary associations and pattern completion where space is a component. Consistent with the theory, single neurons in the primate CA3 respond to combinations of spatial view and object, and spatial view and reward. Furthermore, single CA3 neurons reflect the recall of a place from an object in a one-trial object-place event memory task. CA3 neurons also reflect in their firing a memory of spatial view that is retained and updated by idiothetic information to implement path integration when the spatial view is obscured. Based on the computational proposal that the dentate gyrus produces sparse representations by competitive learning and via the mossy fiber pathway forces new representations on the CA3 during learning (encoding), it has been shown behaviorally that the dentate gyrus supports spatial pattern separation during learning, and that the mossy fiber system to CA3 connections are involved in learning but not in recall. The perforant path input to CA3 is quantitatively appropriate to provide the cue for recall in CA3. The concept that the CA1 recodes information from CA3 and sets up associatively learned back-projections to neocortex to allow subsequent retrieval of information to neocortex provides a quantitative account of the large number of hippocampo-neocortical back-projections.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
McClelland, J. L., McNaughton, B. L., & O'Reilly, R. C. (1995) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.102.3.419 · Cited by 5,256
Microstructure of a spatial map in the entorhinal cortex
Hafting, T., Fyhn, M., Molden, S., Moser, M.-B., & Moser, E. I. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03721 · Cited by 4,068
Synaptic Plasticity and Memory: An Evaluation of the Hypothesis
Martin, S. J., Grimwood, P. D., & Morris, R. G. M. (2000) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.23.1.649 · Cited by 2,794
Simple memory: a theory for archicortex
Marr, D. (1971) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. B, Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.1971.0078 · Cited by 2,771
Simplified neuron model as a principal component analyzer
Oja, E. (1982) · Journal of Mathematical Biology · doi:10.1007/bf00275687 · Cited by 2,309
Taube, J., Muller, R., & Ranck, J. (1990) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.10-02-00420.1990 · Cited by 1,809
Hippocampal synaptic enhancement and information storage within a distributed memory system
McNaughton, B. L., & Morris, R. G. M. (1987) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/0166-2236(87)90011-7 · Cited by 1,304
McNaughton, B. L., Barnes, C. A., & O'Keefe, J. (1983) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/bf00237147 · Cited by 1,071
Path integration and cognitive mapping in a continuous attractor neural network model
Samsonovich, A., & McNaughton, B. L. (1997) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.17-15-05900.1997 · Cited by 989
The global record of memory in hippocampal neuronal activity
Wood, E. R., Dudchenko, P. A., & Eichenbaum, H. (1999) · Nature · doi:10.1038/17605 · Cited by 707
Cited by
Pattern separation in the hippocampus
Yassa, M. A., & Stark, C. E. L. (2011) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/j.tins.2011.06.006 · Cited by 1,544
The anatomy of memory: an interactive overview of the parahippocampal–hippocampal network
van Strien, N. M., Cappaert, N. L. M., & Witter, M. P. (2009) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2614 · Cited by 1,041
Neurogenesis and generalization: a new approach to stratify and treat anxiety disorders
Kheirbek, M. A., Klemenhagen, K. C., Sahay, A., & Hen, R. (2012) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.3262 · Cited by 508
Limbic systems for emotion and for memory, but no single limbic system
Rolls, E. T. (2015) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2013.12.005 · Cited by 428
Self-citationDistinct roles for dorsal CA3 and CA1 in memory for sequential nonspatial events
Farovik, A., Dupont, L. M., & Eichenbaum, H. (2010) · Learning & Memory · doi:10.1101/lm.1616209 · Cited by 140
Metadata
- Authors
- Rolls, E. T.
- Venue
- Learning & Memory
- Publisher
- Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
- Published
- 2007-11-14
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 714-731
- ISSN
- 1072-0502 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2140817479
- Cited by
- 238
- References
- 18
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An attractor network in the hippocampus: Theory and neurophysiology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1101/lm.631207
- The paper
- Rolls, E. T. (2007). An attractor network in the hippocampus: Theory and neurophysiology. Learning & Memory. https://doi.org/10.1101/lm.631207
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.