Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 336

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Reproductive Methods as Factors in Speciation in Flowering Plants

Baker, H. G.·1959·Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology

Abstract

The study of pollination systems and other aspects of the biology of reproduction in flowering plants was pursued vigorously in the last half of the nineteenth century but went into a decline at the beginning of the twentieth. With the development of population genetics, however, has come a realization that the methods by which the plants in a species reproduce have a very important effect upon the genetical structure of the populations which they form. In turn, the structure of the populations has an equally important bearing on the future evolution of the species, as well as the production of new species from it.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/sqb.1959.024.01.019

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 336

Metadata

Authors
Baker, H. G.
Venue
Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology
Published
1959-01-01
Volume
24
Issue
0
Pages
177-191
ISSN
  • 0091-7451 (ISSN-L)
  • 1943-4456
OpenAlex
W2328756704
Cited by
336
References
0
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reproductive Methods as Factors in Speciation in Flowering Plants. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1101/sqb.1959.024.01.019
The paper
Baker, H. G. (1959). Reproductive Methods as Factors in Speciation in Flowering Plants. Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology. https://doi.org/10.1101/sqb.1959.024.01.019

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.