Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 342

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Roles of Proprioceptive Input in the Programming of Arm Trajectories

Ghez, C., Gordon, J., Ghilardi, M.F., Christakos, C.N., Cooper, S.E.·1990·Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology

Abstract

It has been known for more than 100 years that loss or impairment of sensation in our limbs may produce severe disorders of movement and that sensory input plays a critical role in controlling movement. Indeed, the skin, muscles, and ioints of our limbs are richly innervated by a variety of sensory receptors that convey proprioceptive information to all levels of the nervous system. What role this input plays in movement control has been a question of recurring interest but remains incompletely understood. In 1895, Mott and Sherring-ton demonstrated that surgical deafferentation of a monkey's limb produces evere disorders of movement and an unwillingness to use the limb in purposeful action. They therefore concluded that movement initia-tion requires the support of afferent information and proposed that coordinated movement results from the concatenation of reflex responses. Subsequently, how-ever, it was established that deafferentation does not abolish the capacity to make purposeful movements and that motor performance may be substantially pre-served when deafferentation is bilateral or when specific training procedures are used (Munk 1909; Knapp et al. 1963: Taub and Berman 1963; Polit and Bizzi 1979). This indicated that sensory input from the limbs is required neither to initiate movement nor to perform complex motor acts, as originally believed by Sherrington. Rather, the central nervous ystem makes use of motor programs to direct movements (Keele 1968). Nevertheless, the movements of deafferented monkeys have been repeatedly described as clumsy, inaccurate, and poorly coordinated (Munk 1909; Bos-sore 1974). Thus, although not necessary for the pro-duction of movement, sensory information, particularly from muscle receptors, clearly plays an important role in its control. To examine the role of proprioceptive input in the control of limb movement, several investigators

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/sqb.1990.055.01.079

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 14 references

Cited by

See all 342

Metadata

Authors
Ghez, C., Gordon, J., Ghilardi, M. F., Christakos, C. N., & Cooper, S. E.
Venue
Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology
Published
1990-01-01
Volume
55
Issue
0
Pages
837-847
ISSN
  • 0091-7451 (ISSN-L)
  • 1943-4456
OpenAlex
W1974598659
Cited by
342
References
14
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Roles of Proprioceptive Input in the Programming of Arm Trajectories. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1101/sqb.1990.055.01.079
The paper
Ghez, C., Gordon, J., Ghilardi, M. F., Christakos, C. N., & Cooper, S. E. (1990). Roles of Proprioceptive Input in the Programming of Arm Trajectories. Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology. https://doi.org/10.1101/sqb.1990.055.01.079

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.