The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Quantifying tumour heterogeneity with CT
Open accessAbstract
Heterogeneity is a key feature of malignancy associated with adverse tumour biology. Quantifying heterogeneity could provide a useful non-invasive imaging biomarker. Heterogeneity on computed tomography (CT) can be quantified using texture analysis which extracts spatial information from CT images (unenhanced, contrast-enhanced and derived images such as CT perfusion) that may not be perceptible to the naked eye. The main components of texture analysis can be categorized into image transformation and quantification. Image transformation filters the conventional image into its basic components (spatial, frequency, etc.) to produce derived subimages. Texture quantification techniques include structural-, model- (fractal dimensions), statistical- and frequency-based methods. The underlying tumour biology that CT texture analysis may reflect includes (but is not limited to) tumour hypoxia and angiogenesis. Emerging studies show that CT texture analysis has the potential to be a useful adjunct in clinical oncologic imaging, providing important information about tumour characterization, prognosis and treatment prediction and response.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Textural Features for Image Classification
Haralick, R. M., Shanmugam, K., & Dinstein, I. (1973) · IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics · doi:10.1109/tsmc.1973.4309314 · Cited by 22,886
Intratumor Heterogeneity and Branched Evolution Revealed by Multiregion Sequencing
Gerlinger, M., Rowan, A. J., Horswell, S., Larkin, J., Endesfelder, D., Gronroos, E., Martinez, P., Matthews, N., Stewart, A., Tarpey, P., et al. (2012) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1113205 · Cited by 7,774
Cited by
CT Texture Analysis: Definitions, Applications, Biologic Correlates, and Challenges
Lubner, M. G., Smith, A. D., Sandrasegaran, K., Sahani, D. V., & Pickhardt, P. J. (2017) · RadioGraphics · doi:10.1148/rg.2017170056 · Cited by 773
Larue, R. T. H. M., Defraene, G., De Ruysscher, D., Lambin, P., & van Elmpt, W. (2017) · The British Journal of Radiology · doi:10.1259/bjr.20160665 · Cited by 363
Ho, L. M., Samei, E., Mazurowski, M. A., Zheng, Y., Allen, B. C., Nelson, R. C., & Marin, D. (2019) · American Journal of Roentgenology · doi:10.2214/ajr.18.20097 · Cited by 65
Distinguishing metastases from benign adrenal masses: what can CT texture analysis do?
Shi, B., Zhang, G.-M.-Y., Xu, M., Jin, Z.-Y., & Sun, H. (2019) · Acta Radiologica · doi:10.1177/0284185119830292 · Cited by 34
Saad, M., & Choi, T.-S. (2018) · Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics · doi:10.1016/j.compmedimag.2018.04.003 · Cited by 23
Metadata
- Authors
- Ganeshan, B., & Miles, K. A.
- Venue
- Cancer Imaging
- Publisher
- E-MED LTD
- Published
- 2013
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 140-149
- ISSN
- 1470-7330 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2025811877
- Cited by
- 395
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 7.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quantifying tumour heterogeneity with CT. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1102/1470-7330.2013.0015
- The paper
- Ganeshan, B., & Miles, K. A. (2013). Quantifying tumour heterogeneity with CT. Cancer Imaging. https://doi.org/10.1102/1470-7330.2013.0015
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.