Cited by 288Quantum chaos and dynamical systemsMathematical Dynamics and FractalsQuantum Mechanics and Applications

Quantum Recurrence Theorem

Bocchieri, P., Loinger, A.·1957·Physical Review

Abstract

A recurrence theorem is proved, which is the quantum analog of the recurrence theorem of Poincaré. Some statistical consequences of the theorem are stressed.Received 9 October 1956DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.107.337©1957 American Physical Society

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrev.107.337

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bocchieri, P., & Loinger, A.
Affiliations
Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare (IT)
Venue
Physical Review
Published
1957-07-15
Volume
107
Issue
2
Pages
337-338
ISSN
0031-899X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1982874713
Cited by
288
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 11
FWCI
1.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Physical Review (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Quantum chaos and dynamical systems
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Mathematical Physics › Mathematical Dynamics and Fractals
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
Keywords
recurrence theorem, Poincaré recurrence, quantum recurrence, quantum statistical mechanics, statistical mechanics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review