Cited by 74Quantum chaos and dynamical systemsMathematical Dynamics and FractalsQuantum Mechanics and Applications

Note on the quantum recurrence theorem

Schulman, L. S.·1978·Physical Review A

Abstract

An essential step in the proof of the quantum recurrence theorem is shown to follow from the Poincaré recurrence theorem of classical mechanics.Received 30 November 1977DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.18.2379©1978 American Physical Society

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physreva.18.2379

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schulman, L. S.
Affiliations
Technion – Israel Institute of Technology (IL)
Corresponding author
Schulman, L. S.
Venue
Physical Review A
Published
1978-11-01
Volume
18
Issue
5
Pages
2379-2380
ISSN
0556-2791 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2019450960
Cited by
74
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Physical Review A (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Quantum chaos and dynamical systems
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Mathematical Physics › Mathematical Dynamics and Fractals
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
Keywords
Poincaré recurrence theorem, classical mechanics, quantum mechanics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review