The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Electromagnetic Interactions of Neutrinos
Abstract
The cross sections for the process (a) $\ensuremath{\nu}+\mathrm{nucleus}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}\ensuremath{\nu}+\ensuremath{\gamma} (\mathrm{virtual}\mathrm{Coulomb})+\mathrm{nucleus}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}\ensuremath{\nu}+\ensuremath{\gamma}+\mathrm{nucleus}$ and the related process (b) $\ensuremath{\gamma}+\mathrm{nucleus}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}\ensuremath{\gamma}+\ensuremath{\gamma} (\mathrm{virtual}\mathrm{Coulomb})+\mathrm{nucleus}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}\ensuremath{\nu}+\overline{\ensuremath{\nu}}+\mathrm{nucleus}$ are calculated to lowest order in the weak and electromagnetic interactions, assuming the existence of a direct electron-neutrino weak interaction. While the relevant Feynman amplitude is given by a formally divergent expression, a finite amplitude is obtained by imposing the condition of gauge invariance. The contribution of process (b) to the neutrino luminosity of stars is worked out and found to be somewhat smaller than that of the processes: ${e}^{\ensuremath{-}}+{e}^{+}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}\ensuremath{\nu}+\overline{\ensuremath{\nu}}$, $\ensuremath{\gamma}+{e}^{\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}{e}^{\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}}+\ensuremath{\nu}+\overline{\ensuremath{\nu}}$. The present calculation is motivated by recent suggestions that stellar evolution may be significantly affected by energy lost by the star due to the emission of neutrinos. A very crude estimate is given for the contribution of the process (c) $\ensuremath{\gamma}+\ensuremath{\gamma}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}\ensuremath{\nu}+\overline{\ensuremath{\nu}}+\ensuremath{\gamma}$ to the neutrino luminosity. It is pointed out that a calculation of process (b) which exists in the literature is non-gauge-invariant.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Axial vector vertex in spinor electrodynamics
Adler, S. L. (1969) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.177.2426 · Cited by 4,275
Lorentz-violating extension of the standard model
Colladay, D., & Kostelecký, V. A. (1998) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.58.116002 · Cited by 2,403
QCD phenomenology based on a chiral effective Lagrangian
Hatsuda, T., & Kunihiro, T. (1994) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/0370-1573(94)90022-1 · Cited by 1,623
Alvarez-Gaumé, L., & Witten, E. (1984) · Nuclear Physics B · doi:10.1016/0550-3213(84)90066-x · Cited by 1,268
Martin, J. (2012) · Comptes Rendus. Physique · doi:10.1016/j.crhy.2012.04.008 · Cited by 913
Metadata
- Authors
- Rosenberg, L.
- Venue
- Physical Review
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 1963-03-15
- Volume
- 129
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 2786-2788
- ISSN
- 0031-899X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2244261355
- Cited by
- 238
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Electromagnetic Interactions of Neutrinos. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrev.129.2786
- The paper
- Rosenberg, L. (1963). Electromagnetic Interactions of Neutrinos. Physical Review. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrev.129.2786
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.