The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Photons and Gravitons in Perturbation Theory: Derivation of Maxwell's and Einstein's Equations
Abstract
The $S$ matrix for photon and graviton processes is studied in perturbation theory, under the restriction that the only creation and annihilation operators for massless particles of spin $j$ allowed in the interaction are those for the physical states with helicity $\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}j$. The most general covariant fields that can be constructed from such operators cannot represent real photon and graviton interactions, because they give amplitudes for emission or absorption of massless particles which vanish as ${p}^{j}$ for momentum $p\ensuremath{\rightarrow}0$. In order to obtain long-range forces it is necessary to introduce noncovariant "potentials" in the interaction, and the Lorentz invariance of the $S$ matrix requires that these potentials be coupled to conserved tensor currents, and also that there appear in the interaction direct current-current couplings, like the Coulomb interaction. We then find that the potentials for $j=1$ and $j=2$ must inevitably satisfy Maxwell's and Einstein's equations in the Heisenberg representation. We also show that although the existence of magnetic monopoles is consistent with parity and time-reversal invariance [provided that $P$ and $T$ are defined to take a monopole into its antiparticle], it is nevertheless impossible to construct a Lorentz-invariant $S$ matrix for magnetic monopoles and charges in perturbation theory.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Theory and Experiment in Gravitational Physics
Will, C. M. (2018) · doi:10.1017/9781316338612 · Cited by 3,637
Quantum Theory of Gravity. II. The Manifestly Covariant Theory
DeWitt, B. S. (1967) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.162.1195 · Cited by 1,765
Beyond the cosmological standard model
Joyce, A., Jain, B., Khoury, J., & Trodden, M. (2015) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2014.12.002 · Cited by 1,231
de Rham, C. (2014) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.12942/lrr-2014-7 · Cited by 1,120
A Four-Dimensional Generalization of the Quantum Hall Effect
Zhang, S.-C., & Hu, J. (2001) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.294.5543.823 · Cited by 530
Dark Energy Versus Modified Gravity
Joyce, A., Lombriser, L., & Schmidt, F. (2016) · Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science · doi:10.1146/annurev-nucl-102115-044553 · Cited by 463
Burrage, C., & Sakstein, J. (2018) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.1007/s41114-018-0011-x · Cited by 366
Stable and unstable cosmological models in bimetric massive gravity
Koennig, F., Akrami, Y., Amendola, L., Motta, M., & Solomon, A. R. (2014) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.90.124014 · Cited by 128
What can cosmology tell us about gravity? Constraining Horndeski gravity with Σ and μ
Pogosian, L., & Silvestri, A. (2016) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.94.104014 · Cited by 112
Pitts, J. B. (2016) · Annals of Physics · doi:10.1016/j.aop.2015.12.002 · Cited by 19
Metadata
- Authors
- Weinberg, S.
- Venue
- Physical Review
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 1965-05-24
- Volume
- 138
- Issue
- 4B
- Pages
- B988-B1002
- ISSN
- 0031-899X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2072321543
- Cited by
- 645
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.