A length operator for canonical quantum gravity
Open accessAbstract
We construct an operator that measures the length of a curve in four-dimensional Lorentzian vacuum quantum gravity. We work in a representation in which an SU(2) connection is diagonal and it is therefore surprising that the operator obtained after regularization is densely defined, does not suffer from factor ordering singularities, and does not require any renormalization. We show that the length operator admits self-adjoint extensions and compute part of its spectrum which, like its companions, the volume and area operators already constructed in the literature, is purely discrete and roughly quantized in units of the Planck length. The length operator contains full and direct information about all the components of the metric tensor which facilitates the construction of so-called weave states which approximate a given classical three-geometry.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
Thiemann constructs a regularized length operator for a curve in four-dimensional Lorentzian vacuum canonical quantum gravity using the real SU(2) connection representation. The operator is densely defined, symmetric, positive semi-definite, admits self-adjoint extensions, and has discrete spectrum roughly quantized in Planck-length units.
Key findings
- The length operator is an unbounded, self-adjoint, positive semi-definite operator with domain \(Cyl^3(\mathcal A/\mathcal G)\); it is gauge invariant and diffeomorphism covariantly defined.
- Its spectrum is purely discrete, with no continuous part, like the area and volume operators; the paper reports a quantum of length involving \(4\sqrt{3}\,\ell_p\) (the displayed denominator is garbled in the provided text).
- On trivalent graphs, all spin-network states are eigenvectors of the length operator, generally with non-vanishing eigenvalues, even though the volume operator vanishes on trivalent graphs.
- The operator contains direct information about all metric components, motivating new intersecting/overlapping “weave” or “lattice” states and a tube operator to approximate a given classical 3-geometry.
Methods
- Works in the real connection representation of canonical quantum gravity, with configuration space \(\mathcal A/\mathcal G\) of generalized SU(2) connections modulo gauge, Hilbert space \(L^2(\mathcal A/\mathcal G,d\mu_0)\), and cylindrical functions on piecewise analytic graphs.
- Regularizes the classical length functional by replacing triad factors with Poisson brackets with the total volume \(V\), then replacing \(V\) by its quantized volume operator and Poisson brackets by commutators; the partition of the curve is adapted to the graph.
- Spectral analysis uses spin-network states and recoupling theory of angular momentum, reducing matrix elements to \(6j\)-symbols; explicit eigenvalues are computed for simple trivalent graph cases.
Limitations
- The paper states that a strict proof is missing that the eigenvalue function diverges with total spin, which would establish discreteness rigorously; it calls the needed behavior “plausible.”
- It states that a closed formula for the volume operator spectrum is lacking, so eigenvalue computations are restricted to simple graph types.
- It cannot show essential self-adjointness because it does not know how to write the operator purely in terms of right-invariant vector fields; it proves only that self-adjoint extensions exist.
- Evident from the text: the construction is mathematical, with no empirical data or observational validation; the tube/weave discussion is illustrative, including a Euclidean example, rather than a full semiclassical analysis.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 24 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingnone given§ Abstract · p. 1
The regularized length operator does not require any renormalization.
“it is therefore surprising that the operator obtained after regularization is densely defined, does not suffer from factor ordering singularities and does not require any renormalization.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Abstract · p. 1
The computed part of the length operator's spectrum is purely discrete.
“We show that the length operator admits self-adjoint extensions and compute part of its spectrum which like its companions, the volume and area operators already constructed in the literature, is purely discrete and roughly is quantized in units of the Planck length.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given§ Abstract · p. 1
The length operator contains full and direct information about all components of the metric tensor.
“The length operator contains full and direct information about all the components of the metric tensor which faciliates the construction of a new type of weave states which approximate a given classical 3-geometry.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ Abstract · p. 1
The length operator's spectrum is roughly quantized in units of the Planck length.
“We show that the length operator admits self-adjoint extensions and compute part of its spectrum which like its companions, the volume and area operators already constructed in the literature, is purely discrete and roughly is quantized in units of the Planck length.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Abstract · p. 1
The length operator admits self-adjoint extensions.
“We show that the length operator admits self-adjoint extensions and compute part of its spectrum which like its companions, the volume and area operators already constructed in the literature, is purely discrete and roughly is quantized in units of the Planck length.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Findingnone given§ Abstract · p. 1
In the representation in which an SU(2) connection is diagonal, the regularized length operator is densely defined.
“it is therefore surprising that the operator obtained after regularization is densely defined, does not suffer from factor ordering singularities and does not require any renormalization.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Abstract · p. 1
Part of the spectrum of the length operator has been computed.
“We show that the length operator admits self-adjoint extensions and compute part of its spectrum which like its companions, the volume and area operators already constructed in the literature, is purely discrete and roughly is quantized in units of the Planck length.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Abstract · p. 1
The paper constructs an operator that measures the length of a curve in four-dimensional Lorentzian vacuum quantum gravity.
“We construct an operator that measures the length of a curve in fourdimensional Lorentzian vacuum quantum gravity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given§ Abstract · p. 1
The regularized length operator does not suffer from factor ordering singularities.
“it is therefore surprising that the operator obtained after regularization is densely defined, does not suffer from factor ordering singularities and does not require any renormalization.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning§ 3.5 Symmetry and positivity · p. 8
Every projection L_γ(c) defines a symmetric and positive semi-definite operator on H with domain Dγ := Cyl^3_γ(A/G).
“Lemma 3.1 Every projection ˆ L γ ( c ) defines a symmetric and positive semi-definite operator on H with domain D γ := Cyl 3 γ ( A / G ) .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning§ 4.1 Discreteness · p. 11
Every eigenvalue of the length, area, or volume operators is of uncountably infinite multiplicity when considering all of H.
“On the other hand we see that every eigenvalue of the length, area or volume operators is of uncountably infinite multiplicity when we consider all of H .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning§ 5 Tube operator and weaves · p. 19
Since the tube is prescribed to be a congruence, each vertex lies on at most one curve.
“Notice that since we have prescribed the tube to be a congruence, it follows that each vertex lies on at most one curve.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning§ 3.1 Regularization of the length operator · p. 5
The regularized quantity (3.7) converges classically to the classical length expression (3.3) in the limit n→∞.
“Therefore (3.7) converges classically to (3.3) in the limit n → ∞ .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning§ 4.2 Eigenvalues · p. 12
The corresponding eigenvalues of the length operator on trivalent graphs are non-vanishing in general.
“We will see that the corresponding eigenvalues are non-vanishing in general.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning§ 4.2.1 Case A · p. 14
In Case A, the spin-network state is an eigenfunction of the length operator L_v(c) with an eigenvalue expressed in terms of lambda_plus, lambda_minus, and n3.
“It follows then from (4.4) and h -1 ˆ V 2 h = ( h -1 ˆ V h ) 2 that our spin-network state is eigenfunction of the length operator ˆ L v ( c ) with eigenvalue ℓ p 2 √ 1 n 3 +1 [( n 3 +2) λ 2 + + n 3 λ 2 -]. 2 2”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning§ 3.4 Cylindrical consistency · p. 8
The operator (3.12) is consistently defined.
“This furnishes the proof that (3.12) is consistently defined.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given§ 3.5 Symmetry and positivity · p. 9
The family (L_γ(c), Dγ) defines a positive semi-definite symmetric operator on D := Cyl^3(A/G).
“Theorem 3.1 The family ( ˆ L γ ( c ) , D γ ) defines a positive semi-definite symmetric operator on D := Cyl 3 ( A / G ) .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning§ 5 Tube operator and weaves · p. 20
There are weave states Psi(q_ab := delta_ab, j0; delta(j0)) which approximate q_ab = delta_ab, with j0 considered a free parameter.
“So we see that there are weave states Ψ( q ab := δ ab , j 0 ; δ ( j 0 )) which approximate q ab = δ ab where we have considered j 0 as a free parameter.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning§ 4.2 Eigenvalues · p. 13
On trivalent graphs, the first three terms in the volume operator expression vanish identically.
“and the simplification that occurs on trivalent graphs is that the first three terms vanish identically.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning§ 5 Tube operator and weaves · p. 20
It follows that delta = Planck length times the cube root of pi times lambda(j0).
“It then follows that δ = ℓ p 3 √ πλ ( j 0 ).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning§ 5 Tube operator and weaves · p. 20
The limit delta approaching infinity gives a zero eigenvalue because Sigma becomes more and more empty.
“The limit δ →∞ gives a zero eigenvalue because Σ becomes more and more empty.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning§ 4.2 Eigenvalues · p. 12
For trivalent graphs, all spin-network states are eigenvectors of the length operator.
“Since for trivalent graphs the vertex contractors of a spin-network are unique and since the result of applying the length operator to a spin-network state is a spin-network state on the same graph and with the same spin, it follows that all spin-network states on trivalent graphs are eigenvectors of the length operator.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning§ 5 Tube operator and weaves · p. 19
Since the length operators L(s_v) commute for distinct vertices, all contributing length operators can be simultaneously diagonalized.
“Since the length operators ˆ L ( s v ) commute for distinct vertices, it follows that all contributing length operators can be simultaneously diagonalized.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning§ 4.1 Discreteness · p. 11
The spectrum attained on D_gamma and D_phi(gamma) is identical for any analyticity-preserving diffeomorphism phi.
“Therefore, the spectrum attained on D γ and D ϕ ( γ ) , ϕ ∈ Diff(Σ) an analyticity preserving diffeomorphism, is identical.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning§ 4.1 Discreteness · p. 10
There exists a countable basis of eigenvectors for Hγ.
“Since spin-networks span D γ and provide a countable basis for its completion H γ (with respect to µ 0 ,γ ) it follows that there exists a countable basis of eigenvectors for H γ .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation§ 5 Tube operator and weaves · p. 20
The weave states used necessarily involve intersecting and overlapping loops with j0 > 1/2, rather than only linked loops.
“Also observe that we use here weave states which necessarily involve intersecting and overlapping ( j 0 > 1 / 2), rather than only linked, loops [25].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [25] [25] A. Ashtekar, C. Rovelli, L. Smolin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69 (1992) 237 -
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingnone given§ 5 Tube operator and weaves · p. 18
Each intersection makes a contribution no matter whether the intersection point is a vertex or not.
“Each intersection makes a contribution no matter whether the intersection point is a vertex or not.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given§ 4.2.2 Case B · p. 16
The extended spin-network function h_e4 f is represented on the abstract angular momentum Hilbert space by a vector proportional to psi = |j12 = j3, j123 = 0, j = 1/2; j1, j2, j3, j4 = 1/2>.
“The extended spin-network function h e 4 f is represented on the abstract angular momentum Hilbert space by a vector proportional to ψ := | j 12 = j 3 , j 123 = 0 , j = 1 / 2; j 1 , j 2 , j 3 , j 4 = 1 / 2 >”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning§ 4.1 Discreteness · p. 11
The spectrum of L_γ(c) on Hγ is discrete.
“Thus, the spectrum on H γ is discrete in the”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation§ 3.6 Self-adjointness · p. 10
The operator (L(c), D) admits self-adjoint extensions on H.
“Theorem 3.2 The operator ( ˆ L ( c ) , D ) admits self-adjoint extensions on H .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation§ 4.1 Discreteness · p. 10
On each finite-dimensional subspace associated with a fixed graph and fixed edge colouring, the length operator is a symmetric, positive semi-definite, finite-dimensional matrix.
“Since the number of spin-network states associated with a fixed graph and a fixed colouring of its edges by irreducible representations is finite-dimensional [18] it follows that the length operator on each such subspace of D is just a symmetric, positive semi-definite, finite dimensional matrix.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [18] [18] T. Thiemann, 'The inverse Loop Transform', preprint HUTMP-95/B-346, hepth/9601105 -
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingreasoning§ 4.2.2 Case B · p. 18
The eigenvalue of L_v(c) on a trivalent spin-network state T_gamma with vertex v such that c and gamma do not share a segment incident at v is given by a formula where a, b, and c are given through (4.10)-(4.14).
“Theorem 4.2 The eigenvalue of ˆ L v ( c ) on a trivalent spin-network state T γ with vertex v such that c and γ do not share a segment incident at v is given by”
- Also stated in: § 4.2.2 Case B · p. 18 · plain
“where a, b, c are given through (4.10)-(4.14).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § 4.2.2 Case B · p. 18 · plain
- Findingreasoning§ 4.1 Discreteness · p. 11
The spectrum does not depend on whether two curves touch each other in a C^m or C^n fashion for any 1 <= m < n.
“Moreover, the spectrum does not depend on whether two curves touch each other in a C m or C n fashion for any 1 ≤ m<n .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning§ 3.2 Finiteness and choice of the partition adapted to a graph · p. 7
The operator (3.12) is finite for each n because there are at most |V(γ)| terms in the sum.
“This demonstrates that ˆ L n ( c ) is a finite operator for each n because there are at most | V ( γ ) | terms in the sum (3.12).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given§ 5 Tube operator and weaves · p. 19
The classical volume of the region filled by the tube is approximately pi Delta^2 L(c), provided that q_ab is slowly varying there.
“Notice that there is an uncountable sum involved in (5.1). In order to see that this makes sense we first of all notice that the classical volume of the region filled by the tube is given approximately by π ∆ 2 L ( c ), provided that q ab is slowly varying there.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given§ 4.1 Discreteness · p. 11
L_γ(c) has pure point spectrum when restricted to Dγ.
“Summarizing, we have shown that ˆ L γ ( c ) has pure point spectrum when restricted to D γ .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given§ 6 Summary · p. 20
All spin-network states on graphs with valence not bigger than three are eigenvectors of the length operator with, in general, non-vanishing eigenvalue.
“In particular, all spin-network states on graphs with valence not bigger than three are eigenvectors of the length operator with, in general, non-vanishing eigenvalue.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given§ 6 Summary · p. 20
One can build intersecting and overlapping weave states which reproduce the classical length of the tubes given a classical geometry.
“One can build intersecting and overlapping weave states which are such that they reproduce the classical length of the tubes given a classical geometry.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ 1 Introduction · p. 1
In the geometrodynamic representation, the Wheeler-DeWitt constraint operator adopts an algebraic form that is still not rigorously defined or solved almost half a century after its discovery.
“However, in this so-called geometrodynamic representation [1] one of the most important operators, the Wheeler-DeWitt constraint operator, adopts an algebraic form which is so difficult that almost half a century after its discovery it is still unknown how to rigorously define it and much less how to solve it (compare [2] for a detailed analysis).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [1] [1] R. M. Wald, 'General Relativity', The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1989 -
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [2] [2] B. S. DeWitt, Phys. Rev. 160 (1967) 1113, Phys. Rev. 162 (1967) 1195, Phys. Rev. 162 (1967) 1239 -
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationcitation§ 1 Introduction · p. 2
The same novel technique introduced in [6,7] can be used to derive a completely well-defined operator corresponding to the length of a curve.
“It turns out that the same novel technique introduced in [6, 7] can be used to derive a completely well-defined operator corresponding to the length of a curve.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [6] [6] T. Thiemann, 'Anomaly-free formulation of non-perturbative, fourdimensional, Lorentzian quantum gravity', Harvard Preprint HUTMP-96/B350, Physics Lett. B (in press) -
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [7] [7] T. Thiemann, 'Quantum Spin Dynamics (QSD)', Harvard Preprint HUTMP96/B-351 T. Thiemann, 'Quantum Spin Dynamics (QSD) II', Harvard Preprint HUTMP-96/B-352 -
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation§ 1 Introduction · p. 1
It is possible to obtain a finite, densely defined, symmetric operator corresponding to the original Wheeler-DeWitt constraint directly in the Lorentzian regime without multiplying by a power of sqrt(det(q)).
“The second possibility arises from the recent discovery [6, 7] that by employing a certain novel technique it is indeed possible to obtain a finite, densely defined (and symmetric) operator corresponding to the original Wheeler-DeWitt constraint directly in the Lorentzian regime and without multiplying by a power of √ det( q ).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [6] [6] T. Thiemann, 'Anomaly-free formulation of non-perturbative, fourdimensional, Lorentzian quantum gravity', Harvard Preprint HUTMP-96/B350, Physics Lett. B (in press) -
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [7] [7] T. Thiemann, 'Quantum Spin Dynamics (QSD)', Harvard Preprint HUTMP96/B-351 T. Thiemann, 'Quantum Spin Dynamics (QSD) II', Harvard Preprint HUTMP-96/B-352 -
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisereasoning§ 1 Introduction · p. 2
Before this work, only volume and area operators could be constructed in the real connection representation.
“In fact, that is why only volume and area operators could be constructed so far [10, 11].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [10] [10] C. Rovelli, L. Smolin, 'Discreteness of volume and area in quantum gravity' Nucl. Phys. B 442 (1995) 593, Erratum : Nucl. Phys. B 456 (1995) 734 - source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [11] [11] A. Ashtekar, J. Lewandowski, 'Quantum Theory of Geometry I: Area Operators', Preprint CGPG-96/2-4, gr-qc/9602046 -
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning§ Abstract · p. 1
The length operator facilitates the construction of a new type of weave states that approximate a given classical 3-geometry.
“The length operator contains full and direct information about all the components of the metric tensor which faciliates the construction of a new type of weave states which approximate a given classical 3-geometry.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ 1 Introduction · p. 1
The complications of the complex connection can be overcome by starting with Euclidean gravity and Wick rotating to the Lorentzian regime.
“the first possibility is to start with Euclidean gravity, in which the Wheeler-DeWitt constraint is also a polynomial [4], and to Wick rotate the Euclidean theory into the Lorentzian regime [5].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [4] [4] A. Ashtekar, in 'Mathematics and general relativity', AMS, Providence, 1987 -
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [5] [5] T. Thiemann, Acta Cosmologica 21 (1995) 145-67 'Reality conditions inducing transforms for quantum gauge field theory and quantum gravity', preprint HUTMP-95/B-348, gr-qc/9511057 - source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ 4.2 Eigenvalues · p. 13
The matrix elements of the volume operator can be given purely in terms of polynomials of 6j-symbols.
“the matrix elements of the volume operator can be given purely in terms of polynomials of 6 j -symbols [23].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [23] [23] T. Thiemann, 'Closed formula for the matrix elements of the volume operator for canonical quantum gravity', Harvard Preprint HUTMP-96/B-353 -
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning§ 5 Tube operator and weaves · p. 18
A state that approximates a fixed classical 3-geometry has to be defined on an infinite graph filling all of Sigma in the sense that a parameter delta characterizes the average distance between neighbouring vertices.
“It is clear that a state that approximates such a geometry has to be defined on an (infinite, in case Σ is not compact) graph filling all of Σ in the following sense : consider a parameter δ of which we may think as a lattice spacing and which is to characterize the average distance (as measured by q ab ) between neighbouring vertices of the graph.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisenone given§ 2 The real connection representation · p. 3
Cyl(A/G) is dense in H.
“One can show that Cyl( A / G ) is dense in H .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ 5 Tube operator and weaves · p. 20
Since the tube operator is to be state-independent and there is no other state-independent length scale in the problem, one is forced to choose Delta = Planck length.
“Since we want the tube operator to be state-independent and since there is no other state-independent length scale in the problem, we are forced to choose ∆ = ℓ p (which is also physically motivated as above; we have chosen a fixed factor of proportionality to equal unity).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: There is no other state-independent length scale in the problem besides the Planck length.
- Premisenone given§ 2 The real connection representation · p. 3
There is a σ-additive, faithful and diffeomorphism invariant probability measure μ0 on A/G which equips us with a Hilbert space structure H := L2(A/G, dμ0).
“Moreover, there is a σ - additive, faithful and diffeomorphism invariant probability measure µ 0 on A / G which equips us with a Hilbert space structure H := L 2 ( A / G , dµ 0 ).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ 5 Tube operator and weaves · p. 20
If one fixes delta and varies j0, the corresponding classical geometry must be warped compared to delta_ab, because the same curve appears longer the more spin the lattice carries.
“On the other hand we can fix δ , vary j 0 and ask which classical geometry is being approximated. Since one and the same curve appears the longer, according to (5.2), the more spin the lattice carries, we see that that the corresponding q ab must be warped as compared to δ ab .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ 4.2 Eigenvalues · p. 13
The volume operator measures the difference between recoupling schemes of n angular momenta based on J_IJ and J_JK.
“Expression (4.1) captures a neat interpretation of the volume operator : it measures the difference between recoupling schemes of n angular momenta based on J IJ and J JK respectively.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ 2 The real connection representation · p. 3
The elements of A/G are in one-to-one correspondence with the set of all homomorphisms from the group of holonomically equivalent loops in Σ into SU(2)/Ad.
“One can show that the elements of A / G are in one-to-one correspondence with the set of all homomorphisms from the group of holonomically equivalent loops in Σ into SU (2) / Ad [12].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [12] [12] A. Ashtekar, C.J. Isham, Class. & Quan. Grav. 9 , (1992) 1433 A. Ashtekar, J. Lewandowski, 'Representation theory of analytic holonomy C ⋆ algebras', in Knots and quantum gravity , J. Baez (ed), (Oxford University Press, Oxford 1994). -
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning§ 5 Tube operator and weaves · p. 19
The length operator constructed cannot be directly associated with the length of a given classical curve.
“This is obviously not what we want and so the length operator constructed cannot be directly associated with the length of a given classical curve.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ 5 Tube operator and weaves · p. 18
For a good approximation, the parameter delta needs to be small compared to the scales of macroscopic objects.
“In order to serve as a good approximation, the parameter needs to be small as compared to the scales of macroscopic objects.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ 5 Tube operator and weaves · p. 20
Since lambda is a monotonously growing function of j0, the lattice can be chosen the coarser the more spin it carries in order to still approximate the same geometry.
“Since λ is a monotonously growing function of j 0 it follows that the lattice can be chosen the coarser the more spin it carries in order to still approximate the same geometry.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisereasoning§ 3 The length operator · p. 4
The volume functional involves the square root of a polynomial in E^a_i.
“We see that this functional involves the square root of a polynomial in E a i .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisereasoning§ 3.1 Regularization of the length operator · p. 4
The triad is integrable with generating functional V, the total volume of Σ.
“The triad is integrable with generating functional V := V (Σ), the total volume of Σ.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ 4.1 Discreteness · p. 11
The characterization of a graph relevant to the spectrum depends only on discrete labels: the number of vertices N, the valence n(v) of each vertex, and the finite number of topologically different ways of connecting incident edges in a C-infinity manner.
“In other words all we need to know about a graph is a) the number N of its vertices b) the valence n ( v ) of each vertex v c) the topologically different ways of connecting edges incident at different vertices in a C ∞ manner which is a finite number.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ 5 Tube operator and weaves · p. 20
The spin characterizes the eigenvalue of the ADM Hamiltonian.
“Indeed, the spin characterizes the eigenvalue of the ADM Hamiltonian [7, 26].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [7] [7] T. Thiemann, 'Quantum Spin Dynamics (QSD)', Harvard Preprint HUTMP96/B-351 T. Thiemann, 'Quantum Spin Dynamics (QSD) II', Harvard Preprint HUTMP-96/B-352 -
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [26] [26] T. Thiemann, 'The ADM Hamiltonian operator for canonical quantum gravity', Harvard University Preprint
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationnone given§ 6 Summary · p. 20
A satisfactory quantization of the length of a piecewise smooth curve was given.
“A satisfactory quantization of the length of a piecewise smooth curve was given.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- May combine two claims. 39
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 6
- The quote only partly states this claim. 2
May combine two claims.
Findingreasoning§ 4.1 Discreteness · p. 11The complete spectrum of L_γ(c) is already attained on Dγ and it has no continuous part.
“Therefore the complete spectrum of ˆ L γ ( c ) is already attained on D γ and it has no continuous part very much like its companions, the area and volume operators [10, 11].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [10] [10] C. Rovelli, L. Smolin, 'Discreteness of volume and area in quantum gravity' Nucl. Phys. B 442 (1995) 593, Erratum : Nucl. Phys. B 456 (1995) 734 - source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [11] [11] A. Ashtekar, J. Lewandowski, 'Quantum Theory of Geometry I: Area Operators', Preprint CGPG-96/2-4, gr-qc/9602046 -
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Findingreasoning§ 4.1 Discreteness · p. 11The spectrum of the length operator L(c) is attained on D and has no continuous part; this property is shared by the length, area, and volume operators.
“Similarly, it follows that the spectrum of ˆ L ( c ) is attained on D and also does not have a continuous part (this property is shared by all three operators, length, area and volume)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingreasoning§ 5 Tube operator and weaves · p. 20Since Delta = Planck length <= delta(j0), at most one vertex per unit length delta will contribute to Lambda(C), so L(C) correctly measures a one-dimensional object.
“Since we have chosen ∆ = ℓ p ≤ δ ( j 0 ) it follows as a consistency check that at most one vertex per unit length δ will contribute to Λ( C ) so that ˆ L ( C ) correctly measures a one-dimensional object.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Findingnone given§ 4.2.2 Case B · p. 16The 3(n-1)j-symbol can be reduced to a polynomial in 6j-symbols, where n is the valence of the vertex.
“Fortunately one can reduce the 3( n -1) j -symbol to a polynomial in 6 -j symbols, n the valence of the vertex.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Findingnone given§ 5 Tube operator and weaves · p. 19For a Euclidean metric q_ab = delta_ab, one can build a weave from a tri-valent lattice so that all length operators are automatically diagonal.
“As an example assume that we wish to approximate the Euclidean metric q ab = δ ab so that it is everywhere constant and not varying at all. For simplicity we want to consider a weave built from a tri-valent lattice so that all length operators are automatically diagonal.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingreasoning§ 4.2.1 Case A · p. 16The quantum of length is achieved for j0 = 1/2 and is given by a formula.
“The quantum of length is achieved for j 0 = 1 / 2 and given by”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingreasoning§ 3.3 Existence of the limit n →∞ · p. 8For a spin-network state f, L_n(c) f still depends on all edges of γ if f did, and there is no dependence on the segments of the partition of c.
“This furnishes the proof that for a spin-network state f the function ˆ L n ( c ) f still depends on all of the edges of γ if f did and that there is no dependence on the segments of the partition of c which is to be expected since the classical length of a curve is a functional of E a i only.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingreasoning§ 4.2.2 Case B · p. 17q124 reduces to an antisymmetric 3x3 matrix with non-vanishing off-diagonal entries plus or minus a, plus or minus b, plus or minus c, eigenvalues 0 and plus or minus i mu where mu = sqrt(a^2 + b^2 + c^2), and eigenvectors psi0 and psi_plus/minus.
“So ˆ q 124 reduces to an antisymmetric 3 × 3 matrix with non-vanishing off-diagonal entries ± a, ± b, ± c , eigenvalues 0 , ± iµ where µ = √ a 2 + b 2 + c 2 and eigenvectors ψ 0 , ψ ± which can chosen to be”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingreasoning§ 4.2.2 Case B · p. 18Sigma is the eigenvalue of the volume operator V on both psi_plus and psi_minus, while it vanishes on psi0.
“σ being the eigenvalue of ˆ V on both ψ ± while it vanishes on ψ 0 .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingreasoning§ 4.1 Discreteness · p. 10The eigenvalues of the length operator are real and given by non-negative functions λ({j_I}) of the spins j_I associated with the edges of γ.
“Its eigenvalues are real and are given by certain non-negative functions λ ( { j I } ) of the spins j I associated with the edges of γ .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
Findingreasoning§ 5 Tube operator and weaves · p. 19Assuming all edges have equal spin j0, which implies j0 is integral, the eigenvalue of the tube operator is given by a formula which is set equal to L(c).
“To simplify life further, let us assume that all edges have equal spin j 0 which implies that j 0 is integral. Let λ ( j 0 ) be the corresponding eigenvalue in (4.18) (almost never will the lattice have a segment in common with one of the contributing curves). Then it follows that we get for the eigenvalue of the tube operator”
- Also stated in: § 5 Tube operator and weaves · p. 20 · plain
“which we want to equal L ( c ).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § 5 Tube operator and weaves · p. 20 · plain
May combine two claims.
Findingreasoning§ 4.2.1 Case A · p. 15For a divalent vertex not sharing a segment with c, j3 = 0 and necessarily j1 = j2 = j0, and the length eigenvalue simplifies to a formula which for large spin grows as sqrt(j0).
“The formula for λ simplifies if we take v to be a divalent vertex not sharing a segment with c . Then j 3 = 0 and necessarily j 1 = j 2 = j 0 and we find simply”
- Also stated in: § 4.2.1 Case A · p. 15 · plain
“which for large spin grows as √ j 0 .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Also stated in: § 4.2.1 Case A · p. 15 · plain
May combine two claims.
Findingreasoning§ 4.2.2 Case B · p. 17The matrix elements of q124 reduce to 6j-symbols, and a new reduction of the 9j-symbol as a product of 6j-symbols is needed.
“Note that the matrix elements are not of the standard textbook form < j 12 , j 34 | j 13 , j 24 > so that we need to invent a new reduction of the 9 j -symbol as a product of 6 j -symbols.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingreasoning§ 4.2.2 Case B · p. 16The space of states with given values j1, j2, j3, j4 = j = 1/2 is three-dimensional and is spanned by psi, psi_plus, and psi_minus.
“The space of states with given values j 1 , j 2 , j 3 , j 4 = j = 1 / 2 is easily seen to be threedimensional and is spanned by ψ, ψ + , ψ -where ψ ± = | j 12 = j 3 ± 1 , j 123 = 1 , j = 1 / 2; j 1 , j 2 , j 3 , j 4 = 1 / 2 > .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingreasoning§ 5 Tube operator and weaves · p. 19Only a finite number of curves contribute in (5.1), so the tube operator is densely defined on D and is positive semidefinite, symmetric, and possesses self-adjoint extensions.
“It follows that only a finite number of curves contribute in (5.1) and so the tube operator is densely defined on D and it is trivial to see that it is positive semidefinite, symmetric and possesses self-adjoint extensions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: For a genuine distribution of vertices, each curve involved in (5.1) will intersect at most one vertex.
May combine two claims.
Findingreasoning§ 4.2.1 Case A · p. 15For a trivalent spin-network state T_gamma with vertex at v such that c and gamma share a segment incident at v, the eigenvalue lambda of L_v(c) is given by a formula with j3 in {j1+j2, j1+j2-1, ..., |j1-j2|}, provided the edges e1, e2, e3 incident at v are linearly independent; otherwise lambda = 0.
“Theorem 4.1 The eigenvalue λ of ˆ L v ( c ) for a trivalent spin-network state T γ with vertex at v such that c and γ share a segment incident at v is given by ( j 3 ∈ { j 1 + j 2 , j 1 + j 2 -1 , .., | j 1 -j 2 |} )”
- Also stated in: § 4.2.1 Case A · p. 15 · plain
“provided the edges e 1 , e 2 , e 3 of γ incident at v are linearly independent, otherwise λ = 0 .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § 4.2.1 Case A · p. 15 · plain
May combine two claims.
Findingreasoning§ 4.2.2 Case B · p. 18The trace tr(h_e4 psi_plus/minus) is zero because in writing h_e4 psi_plus/minus in terms of extended spin-networks one cannot get j = 0 since the contractor corresponding to j123 = 1 is unchanged.
“It follows that tr( h e 4 ψ ± ) = 0 because in writing h e 4 ψ ± in terms of extended spin-networks we cannot get j = 0 since the contractor corresponding to j 123 = 1 is unchanged.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingreasoning§ 5 Tube operator and weaves · p. 19The density of vertices is 1/delta^3, so there are approximately pi L(c) Delta^2 / delta^3 vertices inside the region filled by the tube.
“The density of vertices is given by 1 /δ 3 so that we have approximately πL ( c )∆ 2 /δ 3 vertices inside the region filled by the tube.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingreasoning§ 4.1 Discreteness · p. 11The principal symbol of the volume operator is a non-negative function with an at least two-dimensional kernel and is far from invertible.
“Its principal symbol can be seen to be a non-negative function with an at least two-dimensional kernel and therefore is far from being invertible.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingreasoning§ 4.1 Discreteness · p. 11The matrix elements of the length operator in a spin-network basis do not depend on the graph; they depend only on the quantum numbers j and m and are therefore diffeomorphism invariant.
“Although the set of piecewise analytic graphs is uncountable, the matrix elements of the length operator in a spin-network basis do not depend on the graph, they only depend on the quantum numbers ⃗ j, ⃗ m and are therefore diffeomorphism invariant .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone given§ 4.1 Discreteness · p. 10The length operator L_γ(c) changes neither the graph γ on which a cylindrical function depends nor the irreducible representations of the corresponding spin-network states.
“The important feature of ˆ L γ ( c ) is that it changes neither the graph γ on which a cylindrical function depends nor the irreducible representations of the corresponding spin-network states into which a cylindrical function f can be decomposed.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingreasoning§ 3.3 Existence of the limit n →∞ · p. 7The limit n→∞ in (3.12) exists trivially because (3.12) is independent of the segments s_i.
“We now show that (3.12) is actually independent of the s i so that the limit n →∞ is already taken and the limit therefore exists trivially.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.
Findingnone given§ 6 Summary · p. 20The spectrum is entirely discrete, the quantum of length being given by 4 sqrt(3) times the Planck length divided by a formula.
“The spectrum is entirely discrete, the quantum of the length being given by 4 √ 3 ℓ p / .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone given§ 6 Summary · p. 20The length operator is gauge invariant and diffeomorphism covariantly defined.
“It is gauge invariant and diffeomorphism covariantly defined.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone given§ 6 Summary · p. 20The length operator is an unbounded, self-adjoint, positive semi-definite operator with domain Cyl3(A/G).
“The length operator is an unbounded, self-adjoint, positive semi-definite operator with domain Cyl 3 ( A / G ).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingreasoning§ 6 Summary · p. 20The length operator leaves the piecewise analytic graph of a cylindrical function invariant, in particular analytic, so it is proper to allow the curve to be only piecewise smooth rather than piecewise analytic.
“The length operator leaves the piecewise analytic graph of a cylindrical function invariant (in particular, analytic) therefore it is proper to allow the curve to be only piecewise smooth rather than piecewise analytic.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisenone given§ 1 Introduction · p. 2In the real connection representation, the metric depends on the momentum operator only and in a non-polynomial fashion, making it harder to define a well-defined metric operator.
“In the real connection representation which we will use in the sequel the metric depends on the momentum operator only, and it depends on it in a non-polynomial fashion. It is therefore much harder to define a well-defined operator corresponding to it.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 1 Introduction · p. 1In Lorentzian signature, the underlying connection is complex valued, which makes incorporating the correct reality conditions at the quantum level difficult.
“In the Lorentzian signature the underlying connection is complex valued [3] which renders the task of incorporating the correct reality conditions on the classical phase space variables at the quantum level into a difficult one.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [3] [3] A. Ashtekar, Phys. Rev. Lett. 57 2244 (1986), Phys. Rev. D36 , 1587 (1987). -
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone given§ 1 Introduction · p. 1In the connection representation, the Wheeler-DeWitt operator adopts a polynomial form after multiplying it by sqrt(det(q_ab)).
“Fortunately, there is an alternative, called the connection representation, in which the Wheeler-DeWitt operator adopts a polynomial form after multiplying it by √ det(( q ab )).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ 4.1 Discreteness · p. 11Because the graph characterization depends on discrete labels and a union of countable sets is countable, the spectrum is still discrete in the sense that it does not have a continuous part.
“Thus, since this characterization of a graph depends on discrete labels and the union of countable sets is a countable set it follows that the spectrum is still discrete in the sense that it does not have a continuous part.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 3.1 Regularization of the length operator · p. 5The volume operator (3.5) has dense domain Cyl^3(A/G) and is essentially self-adjoint on H with a purely discrete spectrum.
“One can show that (3.5) has dense domain Cyl 3 ( A / G ) and is an essentially self-adjoint operator on H with a purely discrete spectrum (compare the forthcoming companion paper to [11]).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [11] [11] A. Ashtekar, J. Lewandowski, 'Quantum Theory of Geometry I: Area Operators', Preprint CGPG-96/2-4, gr-qc/9602046 -
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone given§ 5 Tube operator and weaves · p. 18Even for the most random distribution of vertices with mean separation delta, even if delta is much smaller than the length of a given curve, the curve almost never intersects the graph in a vertex, so the quantum length of the curve would always be much smaller than its classical length.
“On the other hand, even for the most random distribution of vertices with mean separation δ , even if δ is much smaller than the length of a given curve, the curve genuinely almost never intersects the graph in a vertex and so the quantum length of the curve would be always much smaller than its classical length.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ 4.1 Discreteness · p. 11The spectrum only depends on the C-infinity properties of the diffeomorphism class of a graph; all that matters is whether two edges are distinct or coincide.
“It follows that the spectrum only depends on the C ∞ properties of the diffeomorphism class of a graph, that is, all that matters is whether two edges are distinct or coincide.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ 5 Tube operator and weaves · p. 20The limit delta approaching 0 blows up; it is physically meaningless to consider lattices with mean distance of vertices smaller than the Planck scale, which hints at a discrete structure.
“The limit δ → 0 blows up, it is physically meaningless to consider lattices with mean distance of vertices smaller than Planck scale which, as already stated in the literature, hints at a discrete structure.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ 5 Tube operator and weaves · p. 18Any macroscopic volume or area in Sigma is necessarily intersected by the graph if delta is small enough, and it is intersected more often the smaller delta is.
“Consider any macroscopic volume or area in Σ. It follows that the graph necessarily intersects these objects provided that δ is small enough and it intersects it the more often the smaller δ .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 4.1 Discreteness · p. 11The volume operator is the fourth root of q†q, where q = sum ǫ_IJK q_IJK, and is a 6th order homogeneous polynomial in the derivative operators X_I.
“Unfortunately this does not work : the volume operator is easily seen to be the fourth root of the operator ˆ q † ˆ q, ˆ q = ∑ IJK ǫ IJK ˆ q IJK (compare [6]) and so is a 6-th order homogenous polynomial in the derivative operators X I .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [6] [6] T. Thiemann, 'Anomaly-free formulation of non-perturbative, fourdimensional, Lorentzian quantum gravity', Harvard Preprint HUTMP-96/B350, Physics Lett. B (in press) -
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ 5 Tube operator and weaves · p. 20This hints that the spin of the lattice must have something to do with curvature, which in turn has to do with the local energy distribution of the gravitational field.
“This hints at the fact that the spin of the lattice must have something to do with the curvature which in turn has to do with the local energy distribution of the gravitational field.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ 4.2 Eigenvalues · p. 12Trivalent graphs are rather special and are insufficient to construct weave states that approximate a given classical geometry.
“This indicates that trivalent graphs are rather special and are insufficient to construct weave states that approximate a given classical geometry.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The volume operator vanishes on trivalent graphs.
- Rests on an assumption: Classically, the volume of a region is known if one can measure the length of arbitrary curves through that region, and non-vanishing length of curves results in non-vanishing volume.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationcitation§ 5 Tube operator and weaves · p. 18Most weave eigenstates typically involved linked rather than intersecting loops, while the length and volume operators automatically annihilate those states, so more general weave states called lattice states are needed.
“Most of these eigenstates typically only involved linked, rather than intersecting loops, while the length and volume operators automatically annihilate those states, we need to construct more general weave states for which the name 'lattice states' is more appropriate.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [25] [25] A. Ashtekar, C. Rovelli, L. Smolin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69 (1992) 237 -
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ 4.2.1 Case A · p. 16The length can change only in packets of Delta L approximately equal to plus or minus 1/2 sqrt(1/j0) times the Planck length, which approaches zero for large spin, so that for high spin the length looks like a continuous operator.
“The length can change only in packets of ∆ L ≈ ± 1 2 √ 1 j 0 ℓ p which approaches zero for large spin so that for high spin the length looks like a continuous operator.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationreasoning§ 5 Tube operator and weaves · p. 19Following the old physical argument that an object always has to have a linear extension of at least one Planck length in order not to form a black hole, a one-dimensional curve cannot correspond to a physical object.
“Following the old physical argument that an object always has to have a linear extension of at least one Planck length in order not to form a black hole, the conclusion is that a one-dimensional curve cannot correspond to a physical object.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: An object must have a linear extension of at least one Planck length in order not to form a black hole.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ 5 Tube operator and weaves · p. 20There is a large number of weave states corresponding to various values of j0 such that the same geometry is approximated; j0 cannot be taken to infinity because delta is much less than L(c).
“Notice that there is a large number of weave states corresponding to the various values of j 0 such that the same geometry is approximated (we cannot let j 0 →∞ because of δ << L ( c )).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 3.1 Regularization of the length operator · p. 5The total volume can be quantized in a mathematically rigorous way, with action on sufficiently differentiable cylindrical functions given by (3.5).
“The total volume can be quantized in a mathematically rigorous way. Its action on sufficiently differentiable cylindrical functions is given by (we follow [11])”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [11] [11] A. Ashtekar, J. Lewandowski, 'Quantum Theory of Geometry I: Area Operators', Preprint CGPG-96/2-4, gr-qc/9602046 -
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Interpretationcitation§ 6 Summary · p. 20The spectral analysis is tedious but straightforward; the complete spectrum can be found by writing a suitable computer code, and this is also true for the volume operator.
“The spectral analysis turns out to be tedious but straightforward. In particular, the methods displayed here reveal that the complete spectrum can be found by writing a suitable computer code. This also is true for the volume operator [23].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [23] [23] T. Thiemann, 'Closed formula for the matrix elements of the volume operator for canonical quantum gravity', Harvard Preprint HUTMP-96/B-353 -
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ 6 Summary · p. 20In order to approximate a 3-geometry, a tube operator has to be constructed.
“In order approximate a 3-geometry a tube operator has to be constructed.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
The authors state this as an assumption.
The excitations of geometry are string-like rather than bubble-like.
“The use of loops to probe connections is radical : those Wilson loop variables can become well-defined operators only if the excitations of geometry are string-like rather than bubble-like. On the other hand, given that assumption, it is possible to explicitly characterize the quantum configuration space A / G of generalized connections modulo gauge transformations.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The operator version of the denominator in the classical length expression has a huge kernel and therefore cannot be defined on a dense domain.
“Even if one could define it, it is by now well known that the operator version of the denominator of (3.2) has a huge kernel so that it could not be defined on a dense domain.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The volume operator has a kernel which includes all divalent and trivalent graphs.
“Indeed, it is by now well-known that the volume operator has a kernel which includes all divalent and trivalent graphs.”
The paper relies on this without support.
An object must have a linear extension of at least one Planck length in order not to form a black hole.
“Following the old physical argument that an object always has to have a linear extension of at least one Planck length in order not to form a black hole”
The paper relies on this without support.
The volume operator vanishes on trivalent graphs.
“because the volume operator is known to vanish on trivalent graphs.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Classically, the volume of a region is known if one can measure the length of arbitrary curves through that region, and non-vanishing length of curves results in non-vanishing volume.
“Now, classically the volume of a region is known if one can measure the length of arbitrary curves through that region and so non-vanishing length of curves results in non-vanishing volume.”
The paper relies on this without support.
For a genuine distribution of vertices, each curve involved in (5.1) will intersect at most one vertex.
“For a genuine distribution of vertices, each curve involved in (5.1) will intersect at most one vertex.”
The paper relies on this without support.
There is no other state-independent length scale in the problem besides the Planck length.
“since there is no other state-independent length scale in the problem”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Continuous space is regarded as an approximate concept at large scales, describable by weave states.
“Continuous space is regarded as an approximate concept at large scales, which can be described by weave states [15].”
From Loop quantum cosmology: I. Kinematics (2000) · cites this paper as [15]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Four-spin basis omits an allowed coupling state
MajorThe stated Clebsch-Gordan decomposition also permits j 12 = j 3 when j 123 = 1 and j 3 ≥ 1 / 2; for example, spin 1 coupled to spin 1 includes spin 1. Thus the claimed three-dimensional basis omits a permitted state, affecting the subsequent matrix and eigenvalue calculation.
“The space of states with given values j 1 , j 2 , j 3 , j 4 = j = 1 / 2 is easily seen to be threedimensional and is spanned by ψ, ψ + , ψ -where ψ ± = | j 12 = j 3 ± 1 , j 123 = 1 , j = 1 / 2; j 1 , j 2 , j 3 , j 4 = 1 / 2 > .”
“the usual Clebsh-Gordan decomposition into irreducibles ( j ) ⊗ ( j ′ ) = ( j + j ′ ) ⊕ ( j + j ′ -1) ⊕ .. ⊕ ( | j -j ′ | ).”
Case A basis has an impossible state at the maximum edge spin
MinorThe paper allows j 3 = j 1 + j 2, but then the claimed V + basis includes j 12 = j 3 + 1. Two spins j 1 and j 2 cannot couple above j 1 + j 2, so V + is not always two-dimensional as stated.
“The space of states V + with total angular momentum j = 1 / 2 and spins j 1 , j 2 , j ′ 3 = j 3 + 1 / 2 is two dimensional : it is spanned by | j 12 = j 3 , j = 1 / 2; j 1 , j 2 , j 3 + 1 / 2 > and | j 12 = j 3 + 1 , j = 1 / 2; j 1 , j 2 , j 3 + 1 / 2 > respectively.”
“( j 3 ∈ { j 1 + j 2 , j 1 + j 2 -1 , .., | j 1 -j 2 |} )”
Cites
Quantum Theory of Gravity. I. The Canonical Theory
DeWitt, B. S. (1967) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.160.1113 · Cited by 3,385 · see citing works
Quantum Theory of Gravity. II. The Manifestly Covariant Theory
DeWitt, B. S. (1967) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.162.1195 · Cited by 1,765 · see citing works
New Variables for Classical and Quantum Gravity
Ashtekar, A. (1986) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.57.2244 · Cited by 1,663 · see citing works
Discreteness of area and volume in quantum gravity
Rovelli, C., & Smolin, L. (1995) · Nuclear Physics B · doi:10.1016/0550-3213(95)00150-q · Cited by 1,365 · see citing works
New Hamiltonian formulation of general relativity
Ashtekar, A. (1987) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.36.1587 · Cited by 1,119 · see citing works
Quantum Theory of Gravity. III. Applications of the Covariant Theory
DeWitt, B. S. (1967) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.162.1239 · Cited by 980 · see citing works
Quantum theory of geometry: I. Area operators
Ashtekar, A., & Lewandowski, J. (1997) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/14/1a/006 · Cited by 852 · see citing works
Real Ashtekar variables for Lorentzian signature space-times
Barbero G., J. F. (1995) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.51.5507 · Cited by 758 · see citing works
Thiemann, T. (1998) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/15/4/011 · Cited by 750 · see citing works
Self-citationQuantum theory of geometry II: Volume operators
Ashtekar, A., & Lewandowski, J. (1997) · Advances in Theoretical and Mathematical Physics · doi:10.4310/atmp.1997.v1.n2.a8 · Cited by 580 · see citing works
Quantization of diffeomorphism invariant theories of connections with local degrees of freedom
Ashtekar, A., Lewandowski, J., Marolf, D., Mourão, J., & Thiemann, T. (1995) · Journal of Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.531252 · Cited by 528 · see citing works
Self-citationWeaving a classical metric with quantum threads
Ashtekar, A., Rovelli, C., & Smolin, L. (1992) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.69.237 · Cited by 399 · see citing works
Projective techniques and functional integration for gauge theories
Ashtekar, A., & Lewandowski, J. (1995) · Journal of Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.531037 · Cited by 388 · see citing works
Representations of the holonomy algebras of gravity and nonAbelian gauge theories
Ashtekar, A., & Isham, C. J. (1992) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/9/6/004 · Cited by 310 · see citing works
Differential geometry on the space of connections via graphs and projective limits
Ashtekar, A., & Lewandowski, J. (1995) · Journal of Geometry and Physics · doi:10.1016/0393-0440(95)00028-g · Cited by 303 · see citing works
Anomaly-free formulation of non-perturbative, four-dimensional Lorentzian quantum gravity
Thiemann, T. (1996) · Physics Letters B · doi:10.1016/0370-2693(96)00532-1 · Cited by 284 · see citing works
Self-citationQuantum spin dynamics (QSD): II. The kernel of the Wheeler - DeWitt constraint operator
Thiemann, T. (1998) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/15/4/012 · Cited by 247 · see citing works
Self-citationThe physical Hamiltonian in nonperturbative quantum gravity
Rovelli, C., & Smolin, L. (1994) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.72.446 · Cited by 215 · see citing works
Closed formula for the matrix elements of the volume operator in canonical quantum gravity
Thiemann, T. (1998) · Journal of Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.532259 · Cited by 141 · see citing works
Self-citationOn the support of the Ashtekar-Lewandowski measure
Marolf, D., & Mourão, J. M. (1995) · Communications in Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1007/bf02099150 · Cited by 136 · see citing works
Quantum Spin Dynamics (QSD) IIPreprint
Thiemann, T. (1996) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.gr-qc/9606090 · Cited by 130 · see citing works
Self-citationReality conditions inducing transforms for quantum gauge field theory and quantum gravity
Thiemann, T. (1996) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/13/6/012 · Cited by 102 · see citing works
Self-citationProduction or annihilation of positrons with bound electrons
Bergstrom, P. M., Kissel, L., & Pratt, R. H. (1996) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.53.2865 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Thiemann, T. (1998) · Journal of Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.532344 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Self-citationQuantum Theory of Geometry II: Volume operatorsPreprint
Ashtekar, A., & Lewandowski, J. (1997) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.gr-qc/9711031 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Spin Networks in Nonperturbative Quantum GravityPreprint
Baez, J. C. (1995) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.gr-qc/9504036
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 10
- 1995, Acta Cosmologica, 21, 145
- T. Thiemann , Harvard University preprint HUTMP-96/B-359, gr-qc/9606089; · arXiv
- 1995, Acta Cosmologica, 21, 132
- 1996, Phys. Rev. D, 54, 5381
- 1995, Nucl. Phys. B, 456, 734
- 1995, Phys. Rev. D, 53, 5743
- T. Thiemann , “The inverse loop transform,” Harvard University preprint HUTMP-95/B-346, hep-th/9601105, · arXiv
- 1996, Phys. Rev. D, 54, 2664
- T. Thiemann , “Closed formula for the matrix elements of the volume operator for canonical quantum gravity,” Harvard University preprint HUTMP-96/B-353, gr-qc/9606091; · arXiv
- T. Thiemann , “QSD VI: Quantum Poincaré Algebra and a Quantum Positivity of Energy Theorem for Canonical Quantum Gravity,” Harvard University preprint HUTMP-96/B-356, gr-qc/9705020. · arXiv
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Background independent quantum gravity: a status report
Ashtekar, A., & Lewandowski, J. (2004) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/21/15/r01 · Cited by 1,951 · see citing works
Quantum geometry of isolated horizons and black hole entropy
Ashtekar, A., Baez, J. C., & Krasnov, K. (2000) · Advances in Theoretical and Mathematical Physics · doi:10.4310/atmp.2000.v4.n1.a1 · Cited by 580 · see citing works
Bojowald, M. (2005) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.12942/lrr-2005-11 · Cited by 723 · see citing works
Spacetime as a Feynman diagram: the connection formulation
Reisenberger, M. P., & Rovelli, C. (2001) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/18/1/308 · Cited by 202 · see citing works
Symmetry reduction for quantized diffeomorphism-invariant theories of connections
Bojowald, M., & Kastrup, H. A. (2000) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/17/15/311 · Cited by 168 · see citing works
Spin-foams for all loop quantum gravity
Kamiński, W., Kisielowski, M., & Lewandowski, J. (2010) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/27/9/095006 · Cited by 191 · see citing works
Quantum theory of geometry: III. Non-commutativity of Riemannian structures
Ashtekar, A., Corichi, A., & Zapata, J. A. (1998) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/15/10/006 · Cited by 129 · see citing works
LQG propagator from the new spin foams
Bianchi, E., Magliaro, E., & Perini, C. (2009) · Nuclear Physics B · doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2009.07.016 · Cited by 126 · see citing works
“(2) The operator O can be a geometric operator as the area, the volume or the length [36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42].”
BackgroundLoop quantum cosmology: I. Kinematics
Bojowald, M. (2000) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/17/6/312 · Cited by 125 · see citing works
Are the spectra of geometrical operators in loop quantum gravity really discrete?
Dittrich, B., & Thiemann, T. (2009) · Journal of Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.3054277 · Cited by 96 · see citing works
Self-citationQuantum geometry with intrinsic local causality
Markopoulou, F., & Smolin, L. (1998) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.58.084032 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
Diffeomorphism covariant representations of the holonomy-flux -algebra
Oko w, A., & Lewandowski, J. (2003) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/20/16/302 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Asymptotics of loop quantum gravity fusion coefficients
Alesci, E., Bianchi, E., Magliaro, E., & Perini, C. (2010) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/27/9/095016 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
- Authors
- Thiemann, T.
- Affiliations
- Harvard University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Thiemann, T.
- Venue
- Journal of Mathematical Physics
- Publisher
- AIP Publishing
- Published
- 1998-06-01
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 3372-3392
- ISSN
- 0022-2488 (ISSN-L)
- 1089-7658
- OpenAlex
- W1970736913
- Semantic Scholar
- 89892c0070973b5903f3712d54262845735cb351
- Cited by
- 156
- References
- 26
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 11
- FWCI
- 6.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Journal of Mathematical Physics (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Mathematical Physics › Advanced Operator Algebra Research
- Keywords
- canonical quantum gravity, SU(2) connection, factor ordering, self-adjoint extensions, discrete spectrum, Planck length, quantum geometry, area operator, volume operator
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-06.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-06.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review