The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Theory of Positrons
Abstract
The problem of the behavior of positrons and electrons in given external potentials, neglecting their mutual interaction, is analyzed by replacing the theory of holes by a reinterpretation of the solutions of the Dirac equation. It is possible to write down a complete solution of the problem in terms of boundary conditions on the wave function, and this solution contains automatically all the possibilities of virtual (and real) pair formation and annihilation together with the ordinary scattering processes, including the correct relative signs of the various terms.In this solution, the "negative energy states" appear in a form which may be pictured (as by St\"uckelberg) in space-time as waves traveling away from the external potential backwards in time. Experimentally, such a wave corresponds to a positron approaching the potential and annihilating the electron. A particle moving forward in time (electron) in a potential may be scattered forward in time (ordinary scattering) or backward (pair annihilation). When moving backward (positron) it may be scattered backward in time (positron scattering) or forward (pair production). For such a particle the amplitude for transition from an initial to a final state is analyzed to any order in the potential by considering it to undergo a sequence of such scatterings.The amplitude for a process involving many such particles is the product of the transition amplitudes for each particle. The exclusion principle requires that antisymmetric combinations of amplitudes be chosen for those complete processes which differ only by exchange of particles. It seems that a consistent interpretation is only possible if the exclusion principle is adopted. The exclusion principle need not be taken into account in intermediate states. Vacuum problems do not arise for charges which do not interact with one another, but these are analyzed nevertheless in anticipation of application to quantum electrodynamics.The results are also expressed in momentum-energy variables. Equivalence to the second quantization theory of holes is proved in an appendix.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Quantum Theory of Gravity. II. The Manifestly Covariant Theory
DeWitt, B. S. (1967) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.162.1195 · Cited by 1,765
Bound States in Quantum Field Theory
Gell-Mann, M., & Low, F. (1951) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.84.350 · Cited by 1,122
Finite Theory of Quantum Electrodynamics
Lee, T. D., & Wick, G. C. (1970) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.2.1033 · Cited by 466
Orbital electron capture by the nucleus
Bambynek, W., Behrens, H., Chen, M. H., Crasemann, B., Fitzpatrick, M. L., Ledingham, K. W. D., Genz, H., Mutterer, M., & Intemann, R. L. (1977) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.49.77 · Cited by 441
Electron Self-Energy Approach to Correlation in a Degenerate Electron Gas
Quinn, J. J., & Ferrell, R. A. (1958) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.112.812 · Cited by 417
Metadata
- Authors
- Feynman, R. P.
- Venue
- Physical Review
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 1949-09-15
- Volume
- 76
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 749-759
- ISSN
- 0031-899X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1995841230
- Cited by
- 1,296
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 31.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Theory of Positrons. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrev.76.749
- The paper
- Feynman, R. P. (1949). The Theory of Positrons. Physical Review. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrev.76.749
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.