The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Spin-glass models of neural networks
Abstract
Two dynamical models, proposed by Hopfield and Little to account for the collective behavior of neural networks, are analyzed. The long-time behavior of these models is governed by the statistical mechanics of infinite-range Ising spin-glass Hamiltonians. Certain configurations of the spin system, chosen at random, which serve as memories, are stored in the quenched random couplings. The present analysis is restricted to the case of a finite number p of memorized spin configurations, in the thermodynamic limit. We show that the long-time behavior of the two models is identical, for all temperatures below a transition temperature ${T}_{c}$. The structure of the stable and metastable states is displayed. Below ${T}_{c}$, these systems have 2p ground states of the Mattis type: Each one of them is fully correlated with one of the stored patterns. Below T\ensuremath{\sim}0.46${T}_{c}$, additional dynamically stable states appear. These metastable states correspond to specific mixings of the embedded patterns. The thermodynamic and dynamic properties of the system in the cases of more general distributions of random memories are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Neural networks and physical systems with emergent collective computational abilities.
Hopfield, J. J. (1982) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.79.8.2554 · Cited by 19,270
Hopfield, J. J. (1984) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.81.10.3088 · Cited by 6,918
Edwards, S. F., & Anderson, P. W. (1975) · Journal of Physics F: Metal Physics · doi:10.1088/0305-4608/5/5/017 · Cited by 3,991
Cited by
The space of interactions in neural network models
Gardner, E. (1988) · Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General · doi:10.1088/0305-4470/21/1/030 · Cited by 1,047
The quest for a Quantum Neural Network
Schuld, M., Sinayskiy, I., & Petruccione, F. (2014) · Quantum Information Processing · doi:10.1007/s11128-014-0809-8 · Cited by 671
Time structure of the activity in neural network models
Gerstner, W. (1995) · Physical Review E · doi:10.1103/physreve.51.738 · Cited by 527
The Hebbian paradigm reintegrated: local reverberations as internal representations
Amit, D. J. (1995) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00040164 · Cited by 388
Self-citationAssociative recall of memory without errors
Kanter, I., & Sompolinsky, H. (1987) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.35.380 · Cited by 379
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Amit, D. J., Gutfreund, H., & Sompolinsky, H.
- Venue
- Physical Review A
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 1985-08-01
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 1007-1018
- ISSN
- 0556-2791 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2069129925
- Cited by
- 1,182
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 24.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Spin-glass models of neural networks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physreva.32.1007
- The paper
- Amit, D. J., Gutfreund, H., & Sompolinsky, H. (1985). Spin-glass models of neural networks. Physical Review A. https://doi.org/10.1103/physreva.32.1007
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.