Cited by 683Quantum Computing Algorithms and ArchitectureNeural Networks and ApplicationsQuantum Information and Cryptography

The quest for a Quantum Neural Network

Open access
Schuld, Maria, Sinayskiy, Ilya, Petruccione, Francesco·2014·Quantum Information Processing

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11128-014-0809-8

Cites

83 of 83 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • South African researchers have produced noteworthy advances in quantum random walks, quantum control, open quantum systems, and pioneering work on quantum neural networks, quantum machine learning, and quantum processes in the brain.

    “has produced noteworthy advances in quantum random walks, 38,39 quantum control, 40 open quantum systems, 41 and pioneering work on quantum neural networks, 42 quantum machine learning, 43 and quantum processes in the brain.44”

    From Toward a quantum future for South Africa (2021) · cites this paper as [42]

  • A key challenge to overcome is the clash between the nonlinear, dissipative dynamics of neural network computing and the linear, reversible dynamics of quantum computing.

    “A key challenge to overcome is the clash between the nonlinear, dissipative dynamics of neural network computing and the linear, reversible dynamics of quantum computing.24”

    From Quantum generalisation of feedforward neural networks (2017) · cites this paper as [24]

  • Making individual neurons reversible and then quantum reversible (unitary) resolves the classical-quantum clash.

    “We make the individual neurons reversible and then naturally generalise them to being quantum reversible (unitary).This resolves the classical-quantum clash mentioned above from ref. 24.”

    From Quantum generalisation of feedforward neural networks (2017) · cites this paper as [24]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 84 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 51

  1. [1]1. M.I. Rabinovich, P. Varona, A.I. Selverston, H.D. Abarbanel, Reviews of modern physics 78 (4), 1213 (2006)
  2. [2]2. W.S. McCulloch, W. Pitts, Bulletin of Mathematical Biology 5 (4), 115 (1943)
  3. [4]4. W.J. Freeman, G. Vitiello, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 41 (30), 304042 (2008)
  4. [5]5. S. Hameroff, Philosophical Transactions: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 356 (1743), pp. 1869 (1998)
  5. [6]6. M. Tegmark, Physical Review E 61 (4), 4194 (2000)
  6. [8]8. E. A¨ ımeur, G. Brassard, S. Gambs, Machine Learning 90 (2), pp. 261-287 (2013)
  7. [10]10. M. Panella, G. Martinelli, International Journal of Circuit Theory and Applications 39 (1), 61 (2011)
  8. [11]11. G.G. Rigatos, S.G. Tzafestas, Integrated Computer-Aided Engineering 14 (3), 225 (2007)
  9. [12]12. P.W. Shor, SIAM journal on computing 26 (5), 1484 (1997)
  10. [13]13. M. Andrecut, M. Ali, International Journal of Modern Physics C 13 (01), 75 (2002)
  11. [15]15. S. Gupta, R. Zia, Journal of Computer and System Sciences 63 (3), 355 (2001)
  12. [17]17. L. Fei, Z. Baoyu, in Neural Networks and Signal Processing, 2003. Proceedings of the 2003 International Conference on , vol. 1 (IEEE, 2003), vol. 1, pp. 539-542
  13. [18]18. R. Zhou, H. Wang, Q. Wu, Y. Shi, International Journal of Theoretical Physics 51 (3), 705 (2012)
  14. [19]19. W. Oliveira, A.J. Silva, T.B. Ludermir, A. Leonel, W.R. Galindo, J.C. Pereira, in Neural Networks, 2008. SBRN'08. 10th Brazilian Symposium on (IEEE, 2008), pp. 147-152
  15. [20]20. G. T´ oth, C.S. Lent, P.D. Tougaw, Y. Brazhnik, W. Weng, W. Porod, R.W. Liu, Y.F. Huang, arXiv preprint cond-mat/0005038 (2000) · arXiv
  16. [24]24. F. Verstraete, M.M. Wolf, J.I. Cirac, Nature Physics 5 (9), 633 (2009)
  17. [25]25. H.J. Briegel, D.E. Browne, W. D¨ urr, R. Raussendorf, M. Van den Nest, Nature Physics 5 (1), pp. 12-26 (2009)
  18. [26]26. E. Farhi, J. Goldstone, S. Gutmann, M. Sipser, arXiv preprint arXiv: quantph/0001106v1 (2000)
  19. [27]27. G.L. Long, International Journal for Theoretical Physics 50 , pp. 1305-1318 (2011)
  20. [29]29. L. Abbott, W.G. Regehr, Nature 431 (7010), 796 (2004)
  21. [30]30. J.J. Hopfield, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 79 (8), 2554 (1982)
  22. [31]31. R. Rojas, Neural Nets: A Systematic Introduction (Springer-Verlag New York Incorporated, 1996)
  23. [32]32. J.J. Hopfield, D.W. Tank, Science 233 (4764), 625 (1986)
  24. [33]33. R.W. Hamming, Bell System Technical Journal 29 (2), 147 (1950)
  25. [34]34. D.J. Amit, H. Gutfreund, H. Sompolinsky, Physical Review A 32 (2), 1007 (1985)
  26. [35]35. J. van Hemmen, Physical Review A 34 (4), 3435 (1986)
  27. [38]38. J.J. Hopfield, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 81 (10), 3088 (1984)
  28. [39]39. D.P. DiVincenzo, et al., arXiv preprint quant-ph/0002077 (2000) · arXiv
  29. [40]40. M. Peruˇ s, Neural Network World 10 (6), 1001 (2000)
  30. [42]42. M. Zak, C.P. Williams, International Journal of Theoretical Physics 37 (2), 651 (1998)
  31. [43]43. E.C. Behrman, J.E. Steck, S.R. Skinner, in Neural Networks, 1999. IJCNN'99. International Joint Conference on , vol. 2 (IEEE, 1999), vol. 2, pp. 874-877
  32. [44]44. J. Faber, G.A. Giraldi, Electronically available: http://arquivosweb. lncc. br/pdfs/QNN-Review. pdf (2002)
  33. [45]45. A.J. Silva, T.B. Ludermir, W. de Oliveira, in Neural Networks (SBRN), 2010 Eleventh Brazilian Symposium on (IEEE, 2010), pp. 1-6
  34. [46]46. C.P. Goncalves, arXiv preprint arXiv:1402.1141v1 (2014) · arXiv
  35. [47]47. D. Ventura, T. Martinez, Information Sciences 124 (1), 273 (2000)
  36. [48]48. C.A. Trugenberger, Physical Review Letters 87 , 067901 (2001)
  37. [49]49. M. Andrecut, M. Ali, International Journal of Modern Physics B 17 (12), 2447 (2003)
  38. [50]50. M. Siomau, arXiv preprint arXiv:1210.6626 (2012) · arXiv
  39. [52]52. E.C. Behrman, L. Nash, J.E. Steck, V. Chandrashekar, S.R. Skinner, Information Sciences 128 (3), 257 (2000)
  40. [54]54. A.J. da Silva, W.R. de Oliveira, T.B. Ludermir, Neurocomputing 75 (1), 52 (2012)
  41. [55]55. G.L. Long, Y. Sun, Physical Review A 64 (1), 014303 (2001)
  42. [56]56. M. Boyer, G. Brassard, P. Hoøyer, A. Tapp, arXiv preprint arXiv: quantph/9605034 (1996)
  43. [57]57. C.A. Trugenberger, Quantum Information Processing 1 (6), pp. 471-493 (2002)
  44. [61]61. R. Neigovzen, J.L. Neves, R. Sollacher, S.J. Glaser, Physical Review A 79 (4), 042321 (2009)
  45. [62]62. F. Li, S. Zhao, B. Zheng, in Signal Processing, 2002 6th International Conference on , vol. 2 (IEEE, 2002), vol. 2, pp. 1267-1270
  46. [65]65. H. Nishimori, Y. Nonomura, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan 65 (12), 3780 (1996)
  47. [66]66. S. Attal, F. Petruccione, I. Sinayskiy, Physics Letters A 376 (18), 1545 (2012)
  48. [67]67. I. Sinayskiy, F. Petruccione, Quantum Information Processing 11 (5), 1301 (2012)
  49. [69]69. J. Kempe, Contemporary Physics 44 (4), 307 (2003)
  50. [70]70. M. Schuld, I. Sinayskiy, F. Petruccione, Physical Review A 89 (3), 032333 (2014)
  51. [71]71. P. Ball, Nature 474 (7351), 272 (2011)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schuld, M., Sinayskiy, I., & Petruccione, F.
Affiliations
  • University of KwaZulu-Natal (ZA)
  • National Institute for Theoretical Physics (ZA)
Corresponding author
Schuld, Maria
Venue
Quantum Information Processing
Published
2014-08-26
Volume
13
Issue
11
Pages
2567-2586
ISSN
  • 1570-0755 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-1332
OpenAlex
W1990514347
Cited by
671
References
84
Citations by year
2026: 83 · 2025: 131 · 2024: 72 · 2023: 80 · 2022: 51 · 2021: 83 · 2020: 49 · 2019: 41 · 2018: 38 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 5
FWCI
14.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Quantum Information Processing (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Neural Networks and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
Keywords
quantum neural networks, Hopfield neural network, associative memory, quantum computing, artificial neural networks, nonlinear dynamics, unitary dynamics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review