The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Quantum nondemolition measurement of the photon number via the optical Kerr effect
Abstract
This paper proposes a quantum nondemolition measurement scheme for the photon number. The signal and probe optical waves interact via the optical Kerr effect. The optical phase of the probe wave is selected as the readout observable for the measurement of the photon number of the signal wave. The measurement accuracy \ensuremath{\Delta}n and the imposed phase noise \ensuremath{\Delta}\ensuremath{\varphi} of the signal wave satisfy Heisenberg's uncertainty principle with an equality sign, 〈(\ensuremath{\Delta}n${)}^{2}$〉〈(\ensuremath{\Delta}\ensuremath{\varphi}${)}^{2}$〉=(1/4). .AE
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Detection of the output ports of the Mach-Zehnder interferometer can reveal whether there was a photon in the signal beam without destroying the signal photon, a quantum non-demolition measurement.
“Moreover, we obtain this information without destroying the signal photon.This is called a quantum non-demolition measurement (Imoto et al. 1985).”
From Linear optical quantum computing with photonic qubits (2007) · cites this paper as Imoto et al. 1985
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 14
- V. B. Braginsky, 1975, Sov. Phys.—Usp., 17, 644, 10.1070/PU1975v017n05ABEH004362 · DOI
- W. G. Unruh, 1979, Phys. Rev. D, 19, 2888, 10.1103/PhysRevD.19.2888 · DOI
- V. B. Braginsky, 1980, Science, 209, 547, 10.1126/science.209.4456.547 · DOI
- C. M. Caves, 1980, Rev. Mod. Phys., 52, 341, 10.1103/RevModPhys.52.341 · DOI
- G. J. Milburn, 1983, Phys. Rev. A, 28, 2065, 10.1103/PhysRevA.28.2065 · DOI
- H. P. Yuen, 1976, Phys. Rev. A, 13, 2226, 10.1103/PhysRevA.13.2226 · DOI
- W. G. Unruh, 1978, Phys. Rev. D, 18, 1764, 10.1103/PhysRevD.18.1764 · DOI
- P. Carruthers, 1965, Phys. Rev. Lett., 14, 387, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.14.387 · DOI
- Y. R. Shen, 1969, Quantum Optics
- R. Serber, 1960, Quantum Electronics
- D. A. Kleinmann, 1962, Phys. Rev., 126, 1977, 10.1103/PhysRev.126.1977 · DOI
- R. Landauer, 1967, Phys. Lett., 416, 10.1016/0375-9601(67)90055-2 · DOI
- E. Arthurs, Jr., 1965, Bell Syst. Tech. J., 44, 725, 10.1002/j.1538-7305.1965.tb01684.x · DOI
- H. P. Yuen, 1983, Opt. Lett., 8, 177, 10.1364/OL.8.000177 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Degen, C. L., Reinhard, F., & Cappellaro, P. (2017) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.89.035002 · Cited by 4,045
Linear optical quantum computing with photonic qubits
Kok, P., Munro, W. J., Nemoto, K., Ralph, T. C., Dowling, J. P., & Milburn, G. J. (2007) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.79.135 · Cited by 2,904
Milburn, G. J. (1989) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.62.2124 · Cited by 440
Symmetry analyzer for nondestructive Bell-state detection using weak nonlinearities
Barrett, S. D., Kok, P., Nemoto, K., Beausoleil, R. G., Munro, W. J., & Spiller, T. P. (2005) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.71.060302 · Cited by 300
Varnava, M., Browne, D. E., & Rudolph, T. (2008) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.100.060502 · Cited by 248
Experimental verification of multipartite entanglement in quantum networks
McCutcheon, W., Pappa, A., Bell, B. A., McMillan, A., Chailloux, A., Lawson, T., Mafu, M., Markham, D., Diamanti, E., Kerenidis, I., et al. (2016) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms13251 · Cited by 137
II Quantum Phenomena in Optical Interferometry
Hariharan, P., & Sanders, B. C. (1996) · Progress in Optics · doi:10.1016/s0079-6638(08)70313-5 · Cited by 36
Metadata
- Authors
- Imoto, N., Haus, H. A., & Yamamoto, Y.
- Venue
- Physical Review A
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 1985-10-01
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 2287-2292
- ISSN
- 0556-2791
- Cited by
- 567
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review