Cited by 567

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Quantum nondemolition measurement of the photon number via the optical Kerr effect

Imoto, N., Haus, H. A., Yamamoto, Y.·1985·Physical Review A

Abstract

This paper proposes a quantum nondemolition measurement scheme for the photon number. The signal and probe optical waves interact via the optical Kerr effect. The optical phase of the probe wave is selected as the readout observable for the measurement of the photon number of the signal wave. The measurement accuracy \ensuremath{\Delta}n and the imposed phase noise \ensuremath{\Delta}\ensuremath{\varphi} of the signal wave satisfy Heisenberg's uncertainty principle with an equality sign, 〈(\ensuremath{\Delta}n${)}^{2}$〉〈(\ensuremath{\Delta}\ensuremath{\varphi}${)}^{2}$〉=(1/4). .AE

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physreva.32.2287

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Detection of the output ports of the Mach-Zehnder interferometer can reveal whether there was a photon in the signal beam without destroying the signal photon, a quantum non-demolition measurement.

    “Moreover, we obtain this information without destroying the signal photon.This is called a quantum non-demolition measurement (Imoto et al. 1985).”

    From Linear optical quantum computing with photonic qubits (2007) · cites this paper as Imoto et al. 1985

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. V. B. Braginsky, 1975, Sov. Phys.—Usp., 17, 644, 10.1070/PU1975v017n05ABEH004362 · DOI
  2. W. G. Unruh, 1979, Phys. Rev. D, 19, 2888, 10.1103/PhysRevD.19.2888 · DOI
  3. V. B. Braginsky, 1980, Science, 209, 547, 10.1126/science.209.4456.547 · DOI
  4. C. M. Caves, 1980, Rev. Mod. Phys., 52, 341, 10.1103/RevModPhys.52.341 · DOI
  5. G. J. Milburn, 1983, Phys. Rev. A, 28, 2065, 10.1103/PhysRevA.28.2065 · DOI
  6. H. P. Yuen, 1976, Phys. Rev. A, 13, 2226, 10.1103/PhysRevA.13.2226 · DOI
  7. W. G. Unruh, 1978, Phys. Rev. D, 18, 1764, 10.1103/PhysRevD.18.1764 · DOI
  8. P. Carruthers, 1965, Phys. Rev. Lett., 14, 387, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.14.387 · DOI
  9. Y. R. Shen, 1969, Quantum Optics
  10. R. Serber, 1960, Quantum Electronics
  11. D. A. Kleinmann, 1962, Phys. Rev., 126, 1977, 10.1103/PhysRev.126.1977 · DOI
  12. R. Landauer, 1967, Phys. Lett., 416, 10.1016/0375-9601(67)90055-2 · DOI
  13. E. Arthurs, Jr., 1965, Bell Syst. Tech. J., 44, 725, 10.1002/j.1538-7305.1965.tb01684.x · DOI
  14. H. P. Yuen, 1983, Opt. Lett., 8, 177, 10.1364/OL.8.000177 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Imoto, N., Haus, H. A., & Yamamoto, Y.
Venue
Physical Review A
Published
1985-10-01
Volume
32
Issue
4
Pages
2287-2292
ISSN
0556-2791
Cited by
567
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review