Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 977

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Spurious dimension from correlation algorithms applied to limited time-series data

Theiler, James·1986·Physical Review A

Abstract

An algorithm devised for measuring the dimension of a strange attractor from a time series is applied both to autocorrelated Gaussian noise and to a dynamical system. It is analytically shown that a finite sequence of stochastic data---where by ``finite'' it is meant that N2${\ensuremath{\tau}}^{m/2}$, where N is the number of points in the sequence, \ensuremath{\tau} is the autocorrelation time (in units of sampling period), and m is the embedding dimension---exhibits anomalous structure in its correlation integral. The anomaly is seen numerically in both stochastic and dynamical data. Unrecognized, it can lead to unnecessarily inaccurate and possibly spurious estimates of dimension. We propose a slight modification of the standard algorithm which eliminates this difficulty.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physreva.34.2427

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 977

Metadata

Authors
Theiler, J.
Venue
Physical Review A
Published
1986-09-01
Volume
34
Issue
3
Pages
2427-2432
ISSN
0556-2791 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2005740351
Cited by
977
References
0
FWCI
7.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Spurious dimension from correlation algorithms applied to limited time-series data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physreva.34.2427
The paper
Theiler, J. (1986). Spurious dimension from correlation algorithms applied to limited time-series data. Physical Review A. https://doi.org/10.1103/physreva.34.2427

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.