Cited by 434Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation StudiesFunctional Brain Connectivity StudiesNeural dynamics and brain function

Modulating functional connectivity patterns and topological functional organization of the human brain with transcranial direct current stimulation

Open access
Polanía, Rafael, Nitsche, Michael A., Paulus, Walter·2011·Human Brain Mapping

Abstract

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a noninvasive brain stimulation technique that alters cortical excitability and activity in a polarity-dependent way. Stimulation for few minutes has been shown to induce plastic alterations of cortical excitability and to improve cognitive performance. These effects might be caused by stimulation-induced alterations of functional cortical network connectivity. We aimed to investigate the impact of tDCS on cortical network function through functional connectivity and graph theoretical analysis. Single recordings in healthy volunteers with 62 electroencephalography channels were acquired before and after 10 min of facilitatory anodal tDCS over the primary motor cortex (M1), combined with inhibitory cathodal tDCS of the contralateral frontopolar cortex, in resting state and during voluntary hand movements. Correlation matrices containing all 62 pairwise electrode combinations were calculated with the synchronization likelihood (SL) method and thresholded to construct undirected graphs for the θ, α, β, low-γ and high-γ frequency bands. SL matrices and undirected graphs were compared before and after tDCS. Functional connectivity patterns significantly increased within premotor, motor, and sensorimotor areas of the stimulated hemisphere during motor activity in the 60-90 Hz frequency range. Additionally, tDCS-induced significant intrahemispheric and interhemispheric connectivity changes in all the studied frequency bands. In summary, we show for the first time evidence for tDCS-induced changes in brain synchronization and topological functional organization.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/hbm.21104

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Functional neuroimaging studies have demonstrated modulation not only of the site of stimulation but also of functionally interconnected (sub)cortical regions.

    “Functional neuroimaging studies have furthermore demonstrated modulation not only of the site of stimulation but also of functionally interconnected (sub)cortical regions (Polanía et al., 2011)”

    From Cognitive Neuroscience of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) and Its Clinical Translation (2018) · cites this paper as Polanía et al., 2011

    The Figure 7 discussion reports that tDCS changed synchronization beyond the stimulated motor area, including premotor and sensorimotor cortical areas. It describes effects on cortico-subcortical network functions as something the observed changes “might be” evidence for, rather than demonstrating modulation of subcortical regions. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Polanía, R., Nitsche, M. A., & Paulus, W.
Affiliations
University of Göttingen (DE)
Venue
Human Brain Mapping
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-07-08
Volume
32
Issue
8
Pages
1236-1249
ISSN
  • 1065-9471 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0193
OpenAlex
W2009053711
Cited by
434
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 35 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 43 · 2016: 33 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 32 · 2012: 21
FWCI
13.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Human Brain Mapping (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion)
  • GRO (submittedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Rose Foundation for Communities and the Environment
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
Keywords
transcranial direct current stimulation, functional connectivity, brain network topology, primary motor cortex, frontopolar cortex, cortical excitability, brain synchronization, interhemispheric connectivity, intrahemispheric connectivity, hand movement, gamma oscillations, graph theory
MeSH terms
Adult, Brain Mapping, Cerebral Cortex, Electric Stimulation, Electroencephalography, Female, Humans, Male, Movement, Nerve Net, Evoked Potentials, Motor

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review