Cited by 532Neural Networks and ApplicationsTheoretical and Computational PhysicsMachine Learning and Algorithms

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Statistical mechanics of learning from examples

Seung, H. S., Sompolinsky, H., Tishby, N.·1992·Physical Review A

Abstract

Learning from examples in feedforward neural networks is studied within a statistical-mechanical framework. Training is assumed to be stochastic, leading to a Gibbs distribution of networks characterized by a temperature parameter T. Learning of realizable rules as well as of unrealizable rules is considered. In the latter case, the target rule cannot be perfectly realized by a network of the given architecture. Two useful approximate theories of learning from examples are studied: the high-temperature limit and the annealed approximation. Exact treatment of the quenched disorder generated by the random sampling of the examples leads to the use of the replica theory. Of primary interest is the generalization curve, namely, the average generalization error ${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\epsilon}}}_{\mathit{g}}$ versus the number of examples P used for training. The theory implies that, for a reduction in ${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\epsilon}}}_{\mathit{g}}$ that remains finite in the large-N limit, P should generally scale as \ensuremath{\alpha}N, where N is the number of independently adjustable weights in the network. We show that for smooth networks, i.e., those with continuously varying weights and smooth transfer functions, the generalization curve asymptotically obeys an inverse power law. In contrast, for nonsmooth networks other behaviors can appear, depending on the nature of the nonlinearities as well as the realizability of the rule. In particular, a discontinuous learning transi…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physreva.45.6056

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Much theoretical and experimental work has shown that the gap between the expected error rate on the test set and the error rate on the training set decreases with the number of training samples approximately as (1).

    “Much theoretical and experimental work [3]- [5] has shown that the gap between the expected error rate on the test set and the error rate on the training set decreases with the number of training samples approximately as (1)”

    From Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition (1998) · cites this paper as [3]

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 58

  1. R. P. Lippman, 1989, Neural Comput., 1
  2. T. J. Sejnowski, 1987, Complex Syst., 1, 145
  3. N. Qian, 1988, J. Mol. Biol., 202, 865, 10.1016/0022-2836(88)90564-5 · DOI
  4. D. Zipser, 1988, Nature, 331, 679, 10.1038/331679a0 · DOI
  5. S. R. Lockery, 1989, Nature, 340, 468, 10.1038/340468a0 · DOI
  6. 1986, Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition
  7. T. Poggio, 1990, Proc. IEEE, 78, 1481, 10.1109/5.58326 · DOI
  8. A. Blumer, 1989, J. ACM, 36, 929, 10.1145/76359.76371 · DOI · Paper page
  9. E. Baum, 1989, Neural Comput., 1, 151, 10.1162/neco.1989.1.1.151 · DOI
  10. S. Judd, 1988, J. Complexity, 1, 177, 10.1016/0885-064X(88)90019-2 · DOI
  11. V. N. Vapnik, 1971, Theory Probab. Appl., 16, 264, 10.1137/1116025 · DOI · Paper page
  12. V. N. Vapnik, 1982, Estimation of Dependences Based on Empirical Data
  13. Y. S. Abu Mostafa, 1989, Neural Comput., 1, 312, 10.1162/neco.1989.1.3.312 · DOI
  14. A. R. Barron, 1989, Proceedings of the 28th Conference on Decision and Control
  15. L. Devroye, 1988, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., 10, 530, 10.1109/34.3915 · DOI
  16. P. Carnevali, 1987, Europhys. Lett., 4, 1199, 10.1209/0295-5075/4/10/020 · DOI
  17. N. Tishby, 1989, Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Neural Networks
  18. E. Levin, 1990, Proc. IEEE, 78, 1568, 10.1109/5.58339 · DOI
  19. P. del Giudice, 1989, J. Phys. (Paris), 50, 121, 10.1051/jphys:01989005002012100 · DOI
  20. D. Hansel, 1990, Europhys. Lett., 11, 687, 10.1209/0295-5075/11/7/018 · DOI
  21. E. Gardner, 1989, J. Phys. A, 22, 1983, 10.1088/0305-4470/22/12/004 · DOI
  22. G. Györgyi, 1990, Phys. Rev. Lett., 64, 2957, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.64.2957 · DOI
  23. W. Krauth, 1988, Complex Syst., 2, 387
  24. J. A. Hertz, 1990, Statistical Mechanics of Neural Networks: Proceedings of the Eleventh Sitges Conference
  25. D. B. Schwartz, 1990, Neural Comput., 2, 374, 10.1162/neco.1990.2.3.374 · DOI
  26. J. Shrager, 1988, Science, 242, 414, 10.1126/science.3175664 · DOI
  27. J. Denker, 1987, Complex Syst., 1, 877
  28. E.L. Thorndike, 1932, Fundamentals of Learning, 10.1037/10976-000 · DOI
  29. W. Kohler, 1929, Gestalt Psychology
  30. W. Krauth, 1989, J. Phys. (Paris), 50, 3057, 10.1051/jphys:0198900500200305700 · DOI
  31. S. S. Venkatesh, 1991, Proceedings of the Fourth Annual Workshop on Computational Learning Theory
  32. H. Sompolinsky, 1990, Europhys. Lett., 13, 567, 10.1209/0295-5075/13/6/016 · DOI
  33. H. Sompolinsky, 1990, Phys. Rev. Lett., 65, 1683, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.65.1683 · DOI
  34. K. Binder, 1988, Monte Carlo Simulation in Statistical Mechanics, 10.1007/978-3-662-08854-8 · DOI
  35. S. Kirkpatrick, Jr., 1983, Science, 220, 671, 10.1126/science.220.4598.671 · DOI · Paper page
  36. S. F. Edwards, 1975, J. Phys. F, 5, 965, 10.1088/0305-4608/5/5/017 · DOI · Paper page
  37. D. Sherrington, 1975, Phys. Rev. Lett., 35, 1792, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.35.1792 · DOI
  38. S. Kirkpatrick, 1978, Phys. Rev. B, 17, 4384, 10.1103/PhysRevB.17.4384 · DOI
  39. H. Sompolinsky, 1981, Phys. Rev. Lett., 47, 935, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.47.935 · DOI
  40. K. Binder, 1986, Rev. Mod. Phys., 58, 801, 10.1103/RevModPhys.58.801 · DOI
  41. M. Mézard, 1987, Spin Glass Theory and Beyond
  42. F. Rosenblatt, 1962, Principles of Neurodynamics
  43. D. J. Thouless, 1978, J. Phys. A, 11, 129, 10.1088/0305-4470/11/6/001 · DOI
  44. M. L. Minsky, 1988, Perceptrons
  45. M. Opper, 1991, Phys. Rev. Lett., 66, 2677, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.66.2677 · DOI
  46. M. Opper, Proceedings of the Fourth Annual Workshop on Computational Learning Theory
  47. E. Gardner, 1986, J. Phys. A, 19, L1047, 10.1088/0305-4470/19/16/017 · DOI
  48. G. Györgyi, 1990, Phys. Rev. A, 41, 7097, 10.1103/PhysRevA.41.7097 · DOI
  49. B. Derrida, 1981, Phys. Rev. B, 24, 2613, 10.1103/PhysRevB.24.2613 · DOI
  50. B. Derrida, 1991, J. Phys. A, 24, 4907, 10.1088/0305-4470/24/20/022 · DOI
  51. J. F. Fontanari, 1991, Network, 2, 353, 10.1088/0954-898X_2_4_002 · DOI
  52. T. M. Cover, 1965, IEEE Trans. Electron. Comput., 14, 326, 10.1109/PGEC.1965.264137 · DOI · Paper page
  53. E. Gardner, 1988, J. Phys. A, 21, 257, 10.1088/0305-4470/21/1/030 · DOI
  54. E. Gardner, 1988, J. Phys. A, 21, 271, 10.1088/0305-4470/21/1/031 · DOI
  55. E. Barkai, 1990, Phys. Rev. Lett., 65, 2312, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.65.2312 · DOI
  56. J. F. Fontanari, 1990, J. Phys. (Paris), 51, 1403, 10.1051/jphys:0199000510130140300 · DOI
  57. E. Barkai, 1992, Phys. Rev. A, 45, 4146, 10.1103/PhysRevA.45.4146 · DOI
  58. E. Barkai, 1991, Europhys. Lett., 14, 107, 10.1209/0295-5075/14/2/003 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Seung, H. S., Sompolinsky, H., & Tishby, N.
Affiliations
AT&T (United States) (US)
Venue
Physical Review A
Published
1992-04-01
Volume
45
Issue
8
Pages
6056-6091
ISSN
  • 0556-2791 (ISSN-L)
  • 1050-2947
  • 1094-1622
OpenAlex
W2090614046
Cited by
532
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
FWCI
45.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Physical Review A (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Neural Networks and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Condensed Matter Physics › Theoretical and Computational Physics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and Algorithms
Keywords
learning from examples, feedforward neural networks, generalization error, learning curve, replica method, annealed approximation, high-temperature approximation, quenched disorder, single-layer perceptron, spin glass phase, learning transitions, inverse power law, stochastic training

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review