The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Statistical mechanics of learning from examples
Abstract
Learning from examples in feedforward neural networks is studied within a statistical-mechanical framework. Training is assumed to be stochastic, leading to a Gibbs distribution of networks characterized by a temperature parameter T. Learning of realizable rules as well as of unrealizable rules is considered. In the latter case, the target rule cannot be perfectly realized by a network of the given architecture. Two useful approximate theories of learning from examples are studied: the high-temperature limit and the annealed approximation. Exact treatment of the quenched disorder generated by the random sampling of the examples leads to the use of the replica theory. Of primary interest is the generalization curve, namely, the average generalization error ${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\epsilon}}}_{\mathit{g}}$ versus the number of examples P used for training. The theory implies that, for a reduction in ${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\epsilon}}}_{\mathit{g}}$ that remains finite in the large-N limit, P should generally scale as \ensuremath{\alpha}N, where N is the number of independently adjustable weights in the network. We show that for smooth networks, i.e., those with continuously varying weights and smooth transfer functions, the generalization curve asymptotically obeys an inverse power law. In contrast, for nonsmooth networks other behaviors can appear, depending on the nature of the nonlinearities as well as the realizability of the rule. In particular, a discontinuous learning transi…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Much theoretical and experimental work has shown that the gap between the expected error rate on the test set and the error rate on the training set decreases with the number of training samples approximately as (1).
“Much theoretical and experimental work [3]- [5] has shown that the gap between the expected error rate on the test set and the error rate on the training set decreases with the number of training samples approximately as (1)”
From Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition (1998) · cites this paper as [3]
Citations
Cites
Backpropagation Applied to Handwritten Zip Code Recognition
LeCun, Y., Boser, B., Denker, J. S., Henderson, D., Howard, R. E., Hubbard, W., & Jackel, L. D. (1989) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.1989.1.4.541 · Cited by 11,891
Spin Glass Theory and Beyond: An Introduction to the Replica Method and Its Applications
Mezard, M., Parisi, G., & Virasoro, M. (1986) · World Scientific Lecture Notes in Physics · doi:10.1142/0271 · Cited by 3,653
Valiant, L. G. (1984) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/1968.1972 · Cited by 3,279
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 58
- R. P. Lippman, 1989, Neural Comput., 1
- T. J. Sejnowski, 1987, Complex Syst., 1, 145
- N. Qian, 1988, J. Mol. Biol., 202, 865, 10.1016/0022-2836(88)90564-5 · DOI
- D. Zipser, 1988, Nature, 331, 679, 10.1038/331679a0 · DOI
- S. R. Lockery, 1989, Nature, 340, 468, 10.1038/340468a0 · DOI
- 1986, Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition
- T. Poggio, 1990, Proc. IEEE, 78, 1481, 10.1109/5.58326 · DOI
- A. Blumer, 1989, J. ACM, 36, 929, 10.1145/76359.76371 · DOI · Paper page
- E. Baum, 1989, Neural Comput., 1, 151, 10.1162/neco.1989.1.1.151 · DOI
- S. Judd, 1988, J. Complexity, 1, 177, 10.1016/0885-064X(88)90019-2 · DOI
- V. N. Vapnik, 1971, Theory Probab. Appl., 16, 264, 10.1137/1116025 · DOI · Paper page
- V. N. Vapnik, 1982, Estimation of Dependences Based on Empirical Data
- Y. S. Abu Mostafa, 1989, Neural Comput., 1, 312, 10.1162/neco.1989.1.3.312 · DOI
- A. R. Barron, 1989, Proceedings of the 28th Conference on Decision and Control
- L. Devroye, 1988, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., 10, 530, 10.1109/34.3915 · DOI
- P. Carnevali, 1987, Europhys. Lett., 4, 1199, 10.1209/0295-5075/4/10/020 · DOI
- N. Tishby, 1989, Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Neural Networks
- E. Levin, 1990, Proc. IEEE, 78, 1568, 10.1109/5.58339 · DOI
- P. del Giudice, 1989, J. Phys. (Paris), 50, 121, 10.1051/jphys:01989005002012100 · DOI
- D. Hansel, 1990, Europhys. Lett., 11, 687, 10.1209/0295-5075/11/7/018 · DOI
- E. Gardner, 1989, J. Phys. A, 22, 1983, 10.1088/0305-4470/22/12/004 · DOI
- G. Györgyi, 1990, Phys. Rev. Lett., 64, 2957, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.64.2957 · DOI
- W. Krauth, 1988, Complex Syst., 2, 387
- J. A. Hertz, 1990, Statistical Mechanics of Neural Networks: Proceedings of the Eleventh Sitges Conference
- D. B. Schwartz, 1990, Neural Comput., 2, 374, 10.1162/neco.1990.2.3.374 · DOI
- J. Shrager, 1988, Science, 242, 414, 10.1126/science.3175664 · DOI
- J. Denker, 1987, Complex Syst., 1, 877
- E.L. Thorndike, 1932, Fundamentals of Learning, 10.1037/10976-000 · DOI
- W. Kohler, 1929, Gestalt Psychology
- W. Krauth, 1989, J. Phys. (Paris), 50, 3057, 10.1051/jphys:0198900500200305700 · DOI
- S. S. Venkatesh, 1991, Proceedings of the Fourth Annual Workshop on Computational Learning Theory
- H. Sompolinsky, 1990, Europhys. Lett., 13, 567, 10.1209/0295-5075/13/6/016 · DOI
- H. Sompolinsky, 1990, Phys. Rev. Lett., 65, 1683, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.65.1683 · DOI
- K. Binder, 1988, Monte Carlo Simulation in Statistical Mechanics, 10.1007/978-3-662-08854-8 · DOI
- S. Kirkpatrick, Jr., 1983, Science, 220, 671, 10.1126/science.220.4598.671 · DOI · Paper page
- S. F. Edwards, 1975, J. Phys. F, 5, 965, 10.1088/0305-4608/5/5/017 · DOI · Paper page
- D. Sherrington, 1975, Phys. Rev. Lett., 35, 1792, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.35.1792 · DOI
- S. Kirkpatrick, 1978, Phys. Rev. B, 17, 4384, 10.1103/PhysRevB.17.4384 · DOI
- H. Sompolinsky, 1981, Phys. Rev. Lett., 47, 935, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.47.935 · DOI
- K. Binder, 1986, Rev. Mod. Phys., 58, 801, 10.1103/RevModPhys.58.801 · DOI
- M. Mézard, 1987, Spin Glass Theory and Beyond
- F. Rosenblatt, 1962, Principles of Neurodynamics
- D. J. Thouless, 1978, J. Phys. A, 11, 129, 10.1088/0305-4470/11/6/001 · DOI
- M. L. Minsky, 1988, Perceptrons
- M. Opper, 1991, Phys. Rev. Lett., 66, 2677, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.66.2677 · DOI
- M. Opper, Proceedings of the Fourth Annual Workshop on Computational Learning Theory
- E. Gardner, 1986, J. Phys. A, 19, L1047, 10.1088/0305-4470/19/16/017 · DOI
- G. Györgyi, 1990, Phys. Rev. A, 41, 7097, 10.1103/PhysRevA.41.7097 · DOI
- B. Derrida, 1981, Phys. Rev. B, 24, 2613, 10.1103/PhysRevB.24.2613 · DOI
- B. Derrida, 1991, J. Phys. A, 24, 4907, 10.1088/0305-4470/24/20/022 · DOI
- J. F. Fontanari, 1991, Network, 2, 353, 10.1088/0954-898X_2_4_002 · DOI
- T. M. Cover, 1965, IEEE Trans. Electron. Comput., 14, 326, 10.1109/PGEC.1965.264137 · DOI · Paper page
- E. Gardner, 1988, J. Phys. A, 21, 257, 10.1088/0305-4470/21/1/030 · DOI
- E. Gardner, 1988, J. Phys. A, 21, 271, 10.1088/0305-4470/21/1/031 · DOI
- E. Barkai, 1990, Phys. Rev. Lett., 65, 2312, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.65.2312 · DOI
- J. F. Fontanari, 1990, J. Phys. (Paris), 51, 1403, 10.1051/jphys:0199000510130140300 · DOI
- E. Barkai, 1992, Phys. Rev. A, 45, 4146, 10.1103/PhysRevA.45.4146 · DOI
- E. Barkai, 1991, Europhys. Lett., 14, 107, 10.1209/0295-5075/14/2/003 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition
Lecun, Y., Bottou, L., Bengio, Y., & Haffner, P. (1998) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/5.726791 · Cited by 58,805
If deep learning is the answer, what is the question?
Saxe, A., Nelli, S., & Summerfield, C. (2021) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41583-020-00395-8 · Cited by 397
Algorithmic Stability and Sanity-Check Bounds for Leave-One-Out Cross-Validation
Kearns, M., & Ron, D. (1999) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/089976699300016304 · Cited by 407
Organizing memories for generalization in complementary learning systems
Sun, W., Advani, M., Spruston, N., Saxe, A., & Fitzgerald, J. E. (2023) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-023-01382-9 · Cited by 103
Bialek, W. (2007) · Les Houches - Ecole d’Ete de Physique Theorique · doi:10.1007/3-540-45701-1_12 · Cited by 16
Metadata
- Authors
- Seung, H. S., Sompolinsky, H., & Tishby, N.
- Affiliations
- AT&T (United States) (US)
- Venue
- Physical Review A
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 1992-04-01
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 6056-6091
- ISSN
- 0556-2791 (ISSN-L)
- 1050-2947
- 1094-1622
- OpenAlex
- W2090614046
- Cited by
- 532
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 25 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 45.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Physical Review A (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Neural Networks and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Condensed Matter Physics › Theoretical and Computational Physics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and Algorithms
- Keywords
- learning from examples, feedforward neural networks, generalization error, learning curve, replica method, annealed approximation, high-temperature approximation, quenched disorder, single-layer perceptron, spin glass phase, learning transitions, inverse power law, stochastic training
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review