The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Observation of a ‘‘quantum eraser’’: A revival of coherence in a two-photon interference experiment
Abstract
We have observed an effect known as a quantum eraser, using a setup similar to one previously employed to demonstrate a violation of Bell's inequalities. In this effect, an interfering system is first rendered incoherent by making the alternate Feynman paths which contribute to the overall process distinguishable; with our apparatus this is achieved by placing a half wave plate in one arm of a Hong-Ou-Mandel interferometer so as to rotate the polarization of the light in that arm by 90\ifmmode^\circ\else\textdegree\fi{}. This adds information to the system, in that polarization is a new parameter which serves to label the path of a given photon, even after a recombining beam splitter. The quantum ``eraser'' removes this information from the state vector, after the output port of the interferometer, but in time to cause interference effects to reappear upon coincidence detection. For this purpose, we use two polarizers in front of our detectors. We present experimental results showing how the degree of erasure (which determines the visibility of the interference) depends on the relative orientation of the polarizers, along with theoretical curves. In addition, we show how this procedure may do more than merely erase, in that the act of ``pasting together'' two previously distinguishable paths can introduce a new relative phase between them.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Measurement of subpicosecond time intervals between two photons by interference
Hong, C. K., Ou, Z. Y., & Mandel, L. (1987) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.59.2044 · Cited by 4,369
Violation of Bell's Inequality and Classical Probability in a Two-Photon Correlation Experiment
Ou, Z. Y., & Mandel, L. (1988) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.61.50 · Cited by 879
Cited by
(2007) · Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) · Cited by 7,214
Decoherence, einselection, and the quantum origins of the classical
Zurek, W. H. (2003) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.75.715 · Cited by 4,295
Multiphoton entanglement and interferometry
Pan, J.-W., Chen, Z.-B., Lu, C.-Y., Weinfurter, H., Zeilinger, A., & Żukowski, M. (2012) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.84.777 · Cited by 1,410
Getting Real: Technoscientific Practices and the Materialization of Reality
Barad, K. (1998) · differences · doi:10.1215/10407391-10-2-87 · Cited by 601
Spectral information and distinguishability in type-II down-conversion with a broadband pump
Grice, W. P., & Walmsley, I. A. (1997) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.56.1627 · Cited by 516
Metadata
- Authors
- Kwiat, P. G., Steinberg, A. M., & Chiao, R. Y.
- Venue
- Physical Review A
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 1992-06-01
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 7729-7739
- ISSN
- 0556-2791 (ISSN-L)
- 1050-2947
- 1094-1622
- OpenAlex
- W2091944421
- Cited by
- 297
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 5.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Observation of a ‘‘quantum eraser’’: A revival of coherence in a two-photon interference experiment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physreva.45.7729
- The paper
- Kwiat, P. G., Steinberg, A. M., & Chiao, R. Y. (1992). Observation of a ‘‘quantum eraser’’: A revival of coherence in a two-photon interference experiment. Physical Review A. https://doi.org/10.1103/physreva.45.7729
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.